I really don't get why people don't consider Peter one of the smartest people on earth. You say that he doesn't have many feats when compared to the ther big brains. Oh I dunno why is that. Maybe because: he's around he's mid twenties (since Stark is 30 something as said in the new iron man series), he never had any resources, he never had any time and is the unluckiest person. Let' examine these things, shall we?
He began his career when he fifteen. He was living in Queens, with barely any money, while trying to balance both his superhero and regular life. At day he was at school (many times he had to suit up so he missed classes), after that he had to either work at bugle, do homework or battle supervillains until the next day.
His resources were limited. Veeeery limited. Also, he didn't have a genius for a relative to guide him. He also missed classes. How was he supossed to know all the stuff he missed? Would the Holy Spirit plant them in his head (it's a saying)? He had to study alone in his very limited time.
Now, let's look at the other geniuses:
Stark grew up with everything and had a genius for a father. His parents saw that (according to the secret origin it was orchestrated to happen) and sent him at MIT at Peter's age. Peter could have gone there had his parents tested his intellect.
T'Challa grew up as the son of the king of the most advanced nation in the world. 'Nuff said.
The one who matches Peter the most in Doom. He grew up with no resources and without anyone particularly smart around him. And yet, around 18-19 he could make grenades and various other small weapons. All of that with the help of sorcery. Add to that that he had ample time. Did he create his time platform while he was at the gypsy camp? No, because he did not have the necessary resources. Did he create his doombots there? No. He took classes, had the best the US had to offer, as well as time and money.
I love how people say that "he could make an advanced weapon from his groceries because he's so smart". Really? Just because someone's smart doesn't mean that he can make a time platform out of a banana, a milk carton and a can of dog food. A banana's a banana and a carton of milk is a carton of milk.
Also, you say he has no feats. Wasn't he the guy who harnessed (he managed to use the cube to bring wolvie back to life) the cosmic cube while in a post apocalyptic future (it's been a long time since i last read wolvie/spidey so pardon any mistakes)? Didn't he make his webshooters and the tracer that could tap into his spidey sense when he was 15? While Doom, with the help of sorcery was making weapons around 18. And building a weapon is easier than discoverin something new and adapting. Nothing like Spidey's tracer was ever done. Doom had source material for his weapons.
Reed is the smartest, that's no lie. But you can't really compare a kid from Queens to grown men who have evrything at their disposal. What did Banner do before entering a lab? Did he make his own atomic bomb when he was 18 years old? No. Yet he is one of the smartest people on earth. You want to know why the have so many feats and spider-man does not? Because these guys are all about science. That's the basis of their character. Spidey's character is: everyman first, street hero second, genius third. People don't give attention to his scientific side and that's why he has no feats. But the feats he has are more than enough to earn him a spot up there with the big boys. And come on, you accept Cho, a guy who does nothing other than say "i'm the 7th smartest guy" having a spot in the top ten and Peter not?
For anyone who cares, here's my top 5 list (heroes only)-EDIT: After a little dweling on my old im comics i'll have to change it a bit.
1-Reed/Valeria
2-Pym
3-Stark
4-Banner
5-Peter
1-Doom/Thanos
2-Leader
3-High Evolutionary
4-Mr. Sinister
5-Ock/Apocalypse
There are many genius villains and heroes but honestly,most of them are just talk,talk,talk.
Log in to comment