@AtPhantom said:
"The comic version was also written by Jeph Loeb.... "
How convenient,
-First, you have no authority to judge a comic author's credibility. DC had given permission for the author to publish this piece of work so they obviously did not see any discrepancy.
-Second, judging logic based on how good a storyline ......Batman dodging Superman. So many selected idiocy, so many logic fallancy. It seems that logic only applies if it support one's perspective, /facepalm.
@AtPhantom said:
" @forze: I'm not saying he has a weakness, I'm saying he has the same vulnerability like every other freaking living being. You don't have an immunity to soul attacks unless it's specifically mentioned. No one does. Maybe try and think through your argument before calling other people's arguments stupid. Second, Magic is by definition an unexplainable laws of physics breaking force. That's the definition it has in DC universe, so whatever Arthur Clark said about advanced technology has no merit here. Manhattan can't bypass magic. Simple as that. "
There you go again, making ridiculous assumption. You keep saying that if something has not happen, then the alternate must only point to ONE conclusion. Logic is based on known fact, you cannot have logic if theres no fact to use. Soul attack may or may not vary from character to character, assumming that everyone is vulnarable because the latter is unknown is logic fallancy.
My previous statement was not meant to be a personal attack.
Log in to comment