okamiCurse

@Manbehindthewires: I take it you would recommend reading Punk Rock Jesus then.

For me this is an extremely difficult question to answer, but I can tell you who some of my favorite characters are, however these are not in order or preference.

1. Deadpool (1990s Deadpool, is the best)

2. The Joker

3. The Mask (I mean the original, though the Jim Carrey movie was decent, it was too different from the comic)

4. She-Hulk (The Sensational series is just awesome)

5. Spider-Man

For me a large part of what decides if I will enjoy the book, is if it is humorous as well as action-packed. What about the rest of you folks?

They said that she was deceased, but it was never made certain. I'm wondering if Marvel will ever pick the story back up, what could they possibly do with it? I think it would be amusing if she showed up fully-grown as one of Norman's underlings. What do you folks think, will they ever pick the story back up?

I'm working on ideas for a video-game. I want to give the player a lot of customization options. The power type I have in mind is the ability to manipulate and generate energy. Be that Magnetic, Ionic, Electric, Photonic, or Gravitational energy. If you want to play as an electrically-charged Brute, you can do that. A speedster, you can do that. If you want to play as a Gravity-Manipulating gunslinger, you can do that. What I wanted to do was give the player an infinite amount of potential to play with, but the amount of experience you can amass is limited, thereby limiting how powerful of a character you could make. What I am wondering is, if I began writing a story focused on such a character, would that character be to powerful to sustain the interest of an audience?

Yes, there are human boxers who have killed people doing just that. Given that Peter can lift ten tons, a punch from him would be ,without holding back, would most likely rip a normal person's head clean off.

I'm asking this, because in the recent issues, Ock has taken over as Spider-Man. He said he would be the 'superior' Spider-Man, however I personally believe that is rather Ludicrous. Peter has a genius level Intellect of 250, whereas Octavius' IQ has never been stated. Peter is a genius, a science Major, and before becoming a science Teacher worked as a professional scientist for a couple of years. Octavius devoted his life to science, and become one of the world's foremost experts on radiation. That may have given him a leg up on Peter, but Peter has in the past worked alongside Tony Stark, Hank Pym, and Reed Richards. This has given him a mass of experience in the realm of science that most people will never get, which is furthered by his experiences in the Super-Human community. Hank Pym even told Peter once that he believed Peter could be a great scientist IF he stopped being Spider-Man and chose to devote his life to science. I believe Peter is a genius Prodigy, but because he has devoted his life to being Spider-Man he hasn't been able to realize his true potential as a scientist. However as a hero Peter knows more then Ock will ever learn, BECAUSE he has devoted his life to being Spider-Man. Personally I think Ock has more experience as a Scientist, but if Peter devoted his life to Science he would be in the same league as Stark, Banner, Richards, and Pym, but he instead devotes his life to being a hero. What do you folks think?

To all posters, this is a genuine question, I'm not looking to start a bunch of arguments, please just answer the question based on your own understanding of the characters.