@kaijukinggojira: Yeah whatever, the creature was made up just like a dragon is made up. Just like Kong was made up or imagined. How would Kong match up against any Hybrid Dinosaur or Dragon made to be the hero for that movie. HAHA lets have Kong go against Draco from Dragonheart.
@kaijukinggojira: Yep, I understand and I don't need you to tell me how things work here. I don't really care anymore about this thread sir. Later
at least T-rex actually existed and Kong didn't, so anyone could come up with a fictional giant like dinosaur the same size as Kong that could kill Kong. It's a two way street.
at least T-rex actually existed and Kong didn't, so anyone could come up with a fictional giant like dinosaur the same size as Kong that could kill Kong. It's a two way street.
Lol IKR. On a forum discussing fictional characters and is on the sub section discussing battles between fictional characters. Not quite sure what that has to do with the thread at hand lol.
I wonder if we have enough live action and cartoon big monsters to do a creature battle.
That sounds like a fun battle, tag me if you do it. Are you thinking Kong/I Rex level creatures? How about the Spinosaurus from J3? It wouldn't win the battle but it's around that level so it could be added.
Whatever, both of these creatures are made up so it could go either way. just like I said in another post 1v1 its like a match up from the video game Primal Rage . King Kong is like the Hulk and well why not think up or make up a Dragon/Utahraptor hybrid or whatever. Or lets give the I-Rex way bigger arms and a huge sickle claw to rip Kongs belly open. Bottom line is Trex existed and Kong didn't . Directors for the original Kong movie just wanted something for Kong to beat up on to make him look badass! IMO
Oh and those V rexes were a fu&kin joke! not bashing the Animators or VFX team on that movie at all, visuals and all were amazing but the way whomever portrayed a bigger stronger T Rex was real bad.
I'm sorry bruh but that may be one of the dumbest things i've read on this forum. Bottom line? Bottom line of what? Bottom line is that this is a forum dedicated to discussing fictional characters and we're in a subsection discussing battles between fictional characters and based off of feats why they would beat each other. The T-Rex existing in one point in time as nothing to do with this match. Both characters don't exist, so what? What the hell does that have to do with anything? We base who would win off of their showings, their feats... them being fictional is irrelevant to this thread and irrelevant to the forum.
Oh and those V rexes were a fu&kin joke! not bashing the Animators or VFX team on that movie at all, visuals and all were amazing but the way whomever portrayed a bigger stronger T Rex was real bad.
And i've already explained why the this is an asinine thing to say. It appears as though you're just a butt hurt T-Rex fan. The V Rexes were not a joke, simply Kong was just that good... it's a feat for him not a low showing for them.
Was looking through this thread again and saw this comment, although I've already addressed what you say in the comment above I felt I needed to do it again because it was just so mindbogglingly off topic and stupid. No offense bro but you really don't understand how this forum works.
Idiotic logic? that's in fact idiotic thinking right there. Did I say irex was going to come at him with a Molotov? You should use your brain before typing. And don't even talk about logic... Kong was on vines which gave him a huge advantage due to him having evolved to climb and swing on trees. The t rexes were on vines and basically sitting ducks. If it was on normal ground then the t rexes would've easily killed him. Have you watched the movie? he was taking on the raptors and the trex alone and still easily beating them. Also I was referring to irex and kongs durability. And irex is clearly much more durable.
Sigh, you didn't need to say I-Rex was going to come at him with a Molotov lol. The only way it would make sense to say I-Rex wins because kong got put down by a molotov is if I-Rex had a molotov, but he doesn't lmao. You think I-Rex wins because of ABC logic which has nothing to do with a fight between Kong and Indominus, kong going down from a molotov proves literally nothing. It does not in any way give the Indominus the win.
It's actually Chloroform. He got hit with 2 bottles and then trapped under nets. Broke free and then got hit with a harpoon, got shot and then a third bottle hit him right in the face. Him passing out from multiple bottles of chloroform and a harpoon in his leg doesn't prove that I-Rex wins.
The t rexes were on vines and basically sitting ducks. If it was on normal ground then the t rexes would've easily killed him.
First of all they aren't T-Rexes. They're evolved T-Rexes called V-Rexes. So Kong was on vines and the V-Rexes would have beaten him otherwise?
Lol! Kong took 3 on before they were on the vines while holding Ann... he was the reason they ended up on the vines as well, he threw them down the cliff. And right after Kong and one of the V-Rexes are off the vines he kills it 1v1.
If it was on normal ground then the t rexes would've easily killed him. Have you watched the movie?
LOL! No that would not have killed him easily on normal ground when they were unable to do so against a handicapped Kong. Have you watched the movie?
he was taking on the raptors and the trex alone and still easily beating them. Also I was referring to irex and kongs durability. And irex is clearly much more durable.
He struggled with the T-Rex some IIRC but there is some context to the fight. Taking on raptors isn't that impressive btw. And that showing doesn't matter, piercing durability and blunt force durability are what matters in this fight... not if Kong can tank a molotov which is actually Chloroform.
The Indominous Rex hype is a bunch of nonsense. The only reason she technically won that fight was between it and the T-rex is because she was able to use her push the T-rex's massive head out of the way.
Evidence in listed here
So the only reason the I-rex truly beat the T-rex was because of a reach advantage ,not even because of it's BS feats like beating the ankylosaur ( which it only did by flipping it on it's side leaving it defenseless) and tanking it's blows to the body (it took one blow).
How would it's reach advantage help it against an animal that has arms that reach it's feet? It doesn't have that advantage here.
Every Animal on skull island is a super sized version of it's pre-historic counter part.
Look at the size of these raptors, these things were Utah raptor sized.
Same goes for the V-rexes. You essentially have an island with much bigger and tougher animals.
And Kong still beat them while being nerfed.
]
Even when compared to the Spinosaurus the I-rex still comes up short.
The Spino lacks feats but it still won the fight as soon as it bit the T-rex on the neck and snapped it's neck like a puppy.
Honestly this is a power scaling debate not a feat debate.
Kong > V-rexes > Spino > Indominous > T-rex
These Indominous threads are ridiculous.
Exactly, this is why Kong wins.
Log in to comment