Despite them both being based on comic book characters, they are two very different kinds of films.

Wtf is this.

I disagree and I banish you from this forum.

i disagree completely

Well not a smart move unless you want to be bashed by batfans

Z0MG BATMAN W/ PREP CAN BEET ANIONE

BATMAN HAZ ONCE BEETN HULK ((Joking but you get what I mean))

BATMAN BEET SUPRMN IN HUSH

BATGODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

DRK NITE WAS BETR CUZ GRITIR

DRK NITE MOAR CLOS 2 COMIX

SPDRMEN MOOOVIS SUC

((Though not all batfans are like that, most of them are.))

Trust me and wait for it

Jmarshmallow

Absolutely not.

Batman and Robin plot is more simple and had more imagination.

Spiderman use Mary Jane in a period where he dated Gwen, not only that it changes a bunch of things and made them more simplistic and more child friendly.

Again Batman and Robin has better action, CGI fight scenes arent good just for CGI fighting.

Otto Octavious was changed to fit the movie, his personality and reasons were totally changed and he wasnt even a villain that drive the plot of the movie, The Riddler, Poison Ivy and Victor Swhargharmcnugget were better villains.

Peter is helped by the plot so he has never to face real consequences of his actions until Spiderman 3, Batman faced consequences from Batman Forever to Batman and Robin and had to change his point of view in life in both movies.

SM 2 is one of my favorite Superhero movies but it's no where near as good as TDK.

They're both excellent.

- TAS

A pretty large chunk of cbm's are better than the The Dark Knight. Spider-man is one of them.

The Dark Knight is insanely overrated, with many comic book films better than it is.

None of the Spider-Man films qualify. Especially the reboot ones.

That being said, I will admit to enjoying Alfred Molina's Dr. Octopus vastly more than Heath Ledger's Joker.

Lol, no. Raimi's Spider-Man wasn't all that.

Got nothing on TDKT.

Finally someone who has common sense instead of blatant mediocre insult after mediocre insult!

I agree with you, except for the "none of the Spider-Man films qualify" part. I actually like those films, especially the reboots.

The first two reasons don't necessarily make a good film.

I wasn't trying to blatantly imply that Spider-Man 2/The Dark Knight are excellent motion pictures I speak my opinion here just about like ONCE A DAY

I respectfully disagree with you, I like the first two very much, yes the third had the emo peter dance sequences but they weren't unwatcahable trust me there's plenty sillier moments in Raimi Spider-Man 1 and 2, its like the 11th silliest moment in those three movies, I hated The Amazing Spider-Man it remade the first 41 minutes of Raimi movies, it had a stupid origin story, a cock inresponsble immature Peter Parker that lets his Uncle Ben die over Chocolate Milk, and Andrew Garfield is a very inconsistent character: Jumping from loser to hipster to Skater to Tough Guy, but The Amazing Spider-Man 2 that on the other hand is the 2nd best spider-man movie (the best obviously being: Spider-Man 2)

Facepalm

I like how OP threw in The Avengers option

@deathpoolthet1000: You know that the main reason why people disagree with Jackson's film was not its differences in details, but with tone.

I know, but people need to understand they complaint of little things that make no sense.

Th essence of the work should be the thing you keep in adaptation, in this case the essence of the characters.

Also, it's funny how the OP brings up TDKR yet chooses to ignore Spider-Man 3...yup, not biased at all. :P

I love the first two raimi films and think the first one's hilarious, but no other movie comes that close to TDK, or especially BB.

Sorry, but why is a simpler plot a good thing?

While I don't agree with your other 4 points, I understand why those points would be important to you and 3 of them are pretty subjective. It's just that first point; I don't equate simplicity with good. Did you feel the Dark Knight was too complicated and you disliked it because you couldn't understand it?

SMH

Doc Ock is NOT better then Joker.

- TAS

Spider-Man 2 is nowhere near the quality of The Dark Knight. Also, I think Spider-Man 2 is a dull film. It has bored me every time I've tried to rewatch it.

I disagree

I don't know how you compare them to be honest. One was a very good Batman film, the other a very good Spiderman film. From a critical perspective, i.e. acting, story, sets, props, etc, I think Dark Knight is the more outstanding picture.

I like dark knight trilogy more but spiderman 2 was the best spiderman film ever

@undefined: the very question I consider the most vile of heresy...

Batman always. But let's forget that one movie...please?

No, you're points are completely based on your opinion as well, so most people won't agree.

Here is my vote..... Spiderman 1 was the best spidey movie... Green Goblin was bad ass.. But Batman begins, and The Dark Knight were both better... Anyone who thinks Spiderman 2 was the best spidey movie is just wrong Doc Ock looked like a fat pervert in his trench coat (ruined the whole damn movie) The amazing spiderman 2 is the second best spidey movie.

IMO Top 5

1) The Dark Knight

2) Batman Begins

3) Spiderman 1

4) Avengers

5) Dark Knight Rises

Agreed 100% !!