@risingbean said:
@avatar_of_green: Melted fairly easily. Are you speaking of when Thor's lightning, Vision's Infinity Stone blast and Iron Man's lol repulsor beam injured him? Heh. That was some output there. Easily. Wow, understatement. You make it sound like a .22 was used when in reality they pulled out the .50.
Ultron takes it. Vibranium is more or less as good as Adamantium. Ultron eventually clocks Wolverine in the head with Thor restraining strength and ko's him.
Unless Ultron's eyes are vulnerable. I could see Logan putting him down with a head shot in that case.
Just to put things in respective. Thor's lightnening does not have a regular damge output. The flashier the effects, the more damage it tends to do. And the shot he hit Ultron with was relatively low effects. A simple shot from his hammer (as opposed to a huge charge up, then a lightening storm like In A1 against the Chitauri or even when he hit the Piller in A2)
Vision's Infinity Stone, while having a sexy name, has absolutely no feats of his own beyond maybe damaging a few fodder bots (I can't remember). Even if we use the transitive property with Loki's staff and assume they're equal...he has maybe....car busting power?
And Iron Man's repulses likewise are not that strong. The Chitauri fodder ships is about the best I can remember him taking down with them. Or the drones in IM2. Iron Man's best weapons are his red laser beams for cutting power, or his "tank missile" (lol). Etc. In large, his repulses are largely used as his spam attack for dispatching fodder. They weren't in designed primarily for offensive, instead for flight.
So yes. Despite the fact that 3 attacks hit him, it was relatively easily to damage him given their fairly low intensity as well as the fact that its suppose to be Vibranium. Cap's shield is significantly more durable than Ultron.
I'm not saying Wolverine wins either btw. But you should be able to understand why someone would criticize Ultron's durability.
Log in to comment