The ends do not justify the means, so it’s the journey that matters more. “It all worked out in the end” does not negate the suffering that led to the resolution.
I agree that ends don't justify the mean, and "It all worked out in the end" does not negate the suffering, but can you elaborate how that applies to the end of the character's journey?
Justice still may needed to be served so a character might have to go to jail or even get the death penalty, but if he or she is still remorseful and truly seeks reconciliation, I don't think the ends justify the means applies to the character's spiritual journey toward redemption since I think all that evil the character committed as villain could have made it so much more difficult for the character to be redeemed since the character could be so attached to sin, but are you just saying that from a narrative perspective, even if a character may end up a hero, there's so much evil done throughout the narrative that the character is still the villain of the piece?
How does that apply to a hero? Because if a character lives a virtuous, self-sacrificial life giving everything to everyone throughout the entire story, but in the last 5 minutes of the story decided to commit mass genocide and set up torture camps, is that character still a hero?
That's why I voted where the character ends up.
But I'd appreciate your thoughts.
Log in to comment