Comic Vine News

312 Comments

Interview: James Robinson Reveals DC's Latest LGBT Character

SPOILER ALERT: The writer discusses the decision to make the leader of the EARTH 2 Justice Society an LGBT character and why that doesn't really matter.

Some writers, like James Robinson, are familiar with writing LGBT characters. Perhaps this is why the decision to re-introduce one of DC's oldest characters as an LGBT character in the New 52 came so easily for the man who wrote the first kiss shared between two gay characters in a comic book. We had the chance to catch up with James and talk to him about the decision, ask him why it was (and wasn't) an important decision, and what readers can expect out of his EARTH 2 series.

No Caption Provided

We also get a look at two pages from EARTH 2 #2, the upcoming issue of his ongoing DC title. Finally, due to the time constraint we were unable to ask all the questions we wanted to ask. We also know there are a lot of questions many of you might have about the decision and the series overall which is why we have invited James to join us for next Friday's podcast (Friday, June 8th 2012). Please submit your questions and comments for James to podcast@comicvine.com. If you don't mind the spoiler before the release of EARTH 2 issue #2, check out the full interview below.

== TEASER ==
*click to enlarge*
*click to enlarge*

Comic Vine: Why Alan Scott? Was this your choice? Was it an Editorial decision and how and when did the decision come about?

James Robinson: It came about 8 months ago when I was first putting the team together. One of the things that bothered me about the reboot and about the Justice Society being young again was that there were some characters that would no longer exist. One of those characters is Obsidian, Alan Scott's gay son. So from then on I started to think about it and it seemed like a logical leap to make Alan Scott gay. And the idea that the leader of the Justice Society, the most honorable, dynamic and gallant hero on Earth 2 would be a gay man just seemed like a really cool and interesting direction for the character.

So it was my idea, but to be fair Dan DiDio, when he heard about the idea, there wasn't a moment of hesitation on his part. He thought it was a great idea

CV: My next question is actually about Obsidian and Jade. Pre-New 52 Alan Scott had had a romantic relationship with Rose Canton and the two characters had twin babies, Obsidian and Jade. Now that Scott has been reintroduced into the DC Universe as a gay character, does that mean neither of these characters (Obsidian and Jade) ever existed? Does that mean Scott and Rose never had a relationship?

JR: Remember, this is a reboot. Not a relaunch. There are sweeping changes that were made in the DC Universe and one of those is that Jade and Obsidian couldn't exist because Alan Scott is just too young -- he's about 27 years old now. So, they couldn't exist in that way but because they were popular characters I have been thinking of a way that they could exist that I might try and implement in the future, but that won't be for a while yet.

CV: As a writer, is it important to make Alan Scott a gay character or is this sort of a "non issue"? How do you see it?

JR: Well, it's not like "ooh, we've got a gay character" -- that's sort of been manufactured by fans, really. I think anyway. We've had this idea running for months and months and I didn't think it was a big deal, honestly. I really didn't think it was a big deal. I mean you should have them. Just like there are LGBT people in all aspects of society, it makes sense that there would be gay characters in comic books as well. And when Dan DiDio made that announcement he wasn't being cryptic, he was just making an off-handed comment. He feels the same way honestly. It's just the reality of life and it's not a big deal. I guess it is to some people and as a result there's been this wave of interest in the subject on the internet and in the media.

No Caption Provided

CV: Alan Scott is a Golden Age character, which means he has a lot of history. Did you worry about any negative reactions from long time fans of the character? Is this something you are anticipating? Or has the feedback so far been mainly positive?

JR: Well it's been mixed. Most people have been very positive and of course there are some people that have…I mean, yes he appeared in a few pages of EARTH 2 #1, but they haven't really gotten to know the character yet. I think there is a rush to pre judge from audiences online, but something I want to stress is that what I want to do with all the EARTH 2 characters is not…I'm not trying to change them in any radical way. In fact I think I am being very faithful to the characters and their origins from the 1940's. These characters have aged…the continuity for Alan Scott, for example, if you follow it is very strange and convoluted. He was an engineer, then a news reader, then he owned the radio station, then he lost his job and became a scientist, then he somehow got back his radio station…So, there's a lot of stuff that's been lead on the character and all I am doing is stripping a lot of that away [getting back to his roots]. What was he back in the day? He was this young, gallant, dynamic take-charge, type A personality, very brave and very caring -- he wanted to protect the world. He was the big powerhouse of the Golden Age characters, in a way. All of that hasn't changed. All that's changed is that the media that he is the master of is the internet media. He's just moving with the times. And in a way he's just moving with the times again. In every way he's the same dynamic, likable Alan Scott that he was before -- all I've really changed is his sexuality; which to me is just one factor of him and it isn't that big of a deal in the first place.

CV: Romantic relationships, will we be seeing any?

JR: At first I'm setting up the team and dealing with threats to the world and everything, but there will be breather moments where we do see what people get up to outside of being a superhero. So yes, you will see romantic relationships.

CV: Are you excited?

JR: I've grown more excited as people have grown excited and interested in it. I was more concerned with other aspects of EARTH 2, Alan Scott's sexuality was just a small part of it but the fact that people have responded so mostly favorably, I am very happy that this have been given the reception that it has been given.

No Caption Provided

CV: Now, this isn't the first time you've written a gay character in comics, you've actually written a gay character in the past, right?

JR: I actually believe I wrote the first gay kiss -- male gay kiss -- in a comic book back in STARMAN #45. So, I've been doing this sort of thing for a while and it isn't that I have any kind of agenda or anything, it's just that when it suits the story and when it makes sense for that character it's just a realistic depiction of present day society.

CV: In your eyes do you feel it's important to have the leader of the EARTH 2 Justice Society be a gay male?

JR: Well, is it important? Not necessarily. But I think it's cool and it makes a change. I mean one of the things that can happen with gay characters is that when they are on a team they sometimes get pushed aside and their whole identity is wrapped up in this "oh that's the gay character." But when you meet Alan Scott you will find that there are so many [other things that define who he is] different aspects to his life, who he is as a person. I mean, I live in San Francisco, I have plenty of gay friends and their sexuality is just a part of who they are. Obviously there's a whole lot more to all of them and Alan Scott is the same way. By making him the team leader there really is no way that I can't show that aspect of a gay person through him being so at the forefront of the team, and that has to be a good thing. This character is going to be very likable, very brave and he will be someone that a lot of people like. I mean, if there are teenage kids and they like Alan Scott and he is kid is going though his or her own feelings about being LGBT…if it helps him or her in any little way, or if a kid reads Alan Scott and he really likes the character and that makes him think twice about bullying a kid, you know, that's a fantastic plus to the character being the leader of the team.

CV: What can we expect in issue #2 of EARTH 2?

JR: The book -- based on the cover -- is sort of apparent. It really focuses a lot on the origin of Jay Garrick and how he becomes the Flash and his origin as the Flash and why he becomes the Flash. What you will also see is the first appearance of Mr. Terrific from his own comic, and you will meet a major villain in the EARTH 2 universe that Mr. Terrific will encounter. That will be a huge part of the second arc. You will also see more of Alan Scott, who he is and what kind of a person he is and some of his origin will be played out in issue #2 and that will be picked up in issue #3 and by issue #3 he will be the Green Lantern.

Issue #2 of EARTH 2 hits stores on June 6th, 2012. We were lucky enough to have the chance to ask James all these questions about EARTH 2, Alan Scott and what we can anticipate in his ongoing series -- but we also want to give you a chance to ask James questions as well. Mr. Robinson will be joining us on our podcast next Friday, June 8th 2012 to discuss the release of issue #2 and anything else you want to talk to him about. Email your questions and comments to podcast@comicvine.com. You can also follow James on Twitter @JamesdRobinson. What do you think of the news?

312 Comments

Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

@spiderbat87 said:

@Redberry said:

I just notice how tiny his boyfriend is. It's like every gay couple in comics have to had a muscle guy and a small guy like: Wiccan and Hulkling, Colossus and Northstar, Alan Scott and his boyfriend, arguably Apollo and Midnighter as well, :p

What?

Colossus is gay in Ultimate. They were caught in bed together, and at some points, Colossus hugged and cried over a dying Northstar. You didn't know?

Avatar image for jonny_anonymous
Jonny_Anonymous

45773

Forum Posts

11109

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 32

Edited By Jonny_Anonymous
@Redberry said:

I just notice how tiny his boyfriend is. It's like every gay couple in comics have to had a muscle guy and a small guy like: Wiccan and Hulkling, Colossus and Northstar, Alan Scott and his boyfriend, arguably Apollo and Midnighter as well, :p

What?
Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

I just notice how tiny his boyfriend is. It's like every gay couple in comics have to had a muscle guy and a small guy like: Wiccan and Hulkling, Colossus and Northstar, Alan Scott and his boyfriend, arguably Apollo and Midnighter as well, :p

Avatar image for jonny_anonymous
Jonny_Anonymous

45773

Forum Posts

11109

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 32

Edited By Jonny_Anonymous
@Oedipus_Rex said:

@spiderbat87 said:

@Oedipus_Rex said:

@spiderbat87 said:

@royale_with_cheese said:

Also reguardless of WHY DC did this it's still a very over due move

No, it's not. It's a move that smacks of desperation. There has never been an "iconic" gay character in DC Comics and it's unlikely there would have been one if they tried to create one from scratch. Now they can make the claim that they have one. They just have to hope that sales don't tank and they have to cancel the book.

So your saying there should be no more gay comic book characters?

No. I'm saying there won't be an iconic one unless you change an established character in an effort to try to manufacture one.

then so be it
Avatar image for oedipus_rex
Oedipus_Rex

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Oedipus_Rex

@spiderbat87 said:

@Oedipus_Rex said:

@spiderbat87 said:

@royale_with_cheese said:

Also reguardless of WHY DC did this it's still a very over due move

No, it's not. It's a move that smacks of desperation. There has never been an "iconic" gay character in DC Comics and it's unlikely there would have been one if they tried to create one from scratch. Now they can make the claim that they have one. They just have to hope that sales don't tank and they have to cancel the book.

So your saying there should be no more gay comic book characters?

No. I'm saying there won't be an iconic one unless you change an established character in an effort to try to manufacture one.

Avatar image for sobe_cin
Sobe Cin

602

Forum Posts

117

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 4

Edited By Sobe Cin

So E! Online posted an article about the future of Ryan Reynold's career as Green Lantern, due to the character now being gay. However, nowhere in the article does it mention either of the names Alan Scott or Hal Jordan. They just proceed to talk about Green Lantern. I find this hilerious, not because of the subject matter, but because of the lack of investigative journalism. Way to fail, E! Online.

But on a side note. DC's decision to turn Alan Scott gay was not a stretch, all I see is the merging of father and son. Obsidian was gay, end of story. No bandwagon, no gimmick.

Avatar image for jonny_anonymous
Jonny_Anonymous

45773

Forum Posts

11109

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 32

Edited By Jonny_Anonymous
@Oedipus_Rex said:

@spiderbat87 said:

@royale_with_cheese said:

Also reguardless of WHY DC did this it's still a very over due move

No, it's not. It's a move that smacks of desperation. There has never been an "iconic" gay character in DC Comics and it's unlikely there would have been one if they tried to create one from scratch. Now they can make the claim that they have one. They just have to hope that sales don't tank and they have to cancel the book.

So your saying there should be no more gay comic book characters?
Avatar image for oedipus_rex
Oedipus_Rex

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Oedipus_Rex

@spiderbat87 said:

@royale_with_cheese said:

Also reguardless of WHY DC did this it's still a very over due move

No, it's not. It's a move that smacks of desperation. There has never been an "iconic" gay character in DC Comics and it's unlikely there would have been one if they tried to create one from scratch. Now they can make the claim that they have one. They just have to hope that sales don't tank and they have to cancel the book.

Avatar image for lifeboy
lifeboy

1717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

Edited By lifeboy
The only gay character i want to see is zatanna. She is just to perfect to be touched by a male. As for alan scott, im sad that they did this to him. I liked him in the old dc universe as a father figure to the jsa. Seeing affection between him and another man is going to bother me.
Avatar image for jonny_anonymous
Jonny_Anonymous

45773

Forum Posts

11109

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 32

Edited By Jonny_Anonymous
@royale_with_cheese said:

@spiderbat87 said:

@royale_with_cheese said:

Most people don't even know who Obsidian is, so there's no justification for making Alan Scott homosexual. Why, just why?

why not?

Because essentially, what Robinson and the staff at D.C have come out and said in response to Alan Scott being gay is that: a) Scott's homosexuality is a homage/legacy to his son Obsidian, and b) to be an honorable, dynamic and gallant leader of the Justice Society in today's day and age you have to be gay. I don't know about you, but frankly those are not valid reasons to conceal a marketing scheme. I.e. appealing to a new generation of readers by conforming to political correctness; that is LGBT.

it is the least important thing about this character so it really makes NO difference, also he didn't say he had to be gay to be gallant, he just said it would be cool if he was because when was the last time you seen that? Also reguardless of WHY DC did this it's still a very over due move  
Avatar image for fanofultraman
FanofUltraman

159

Forum Posts

2330

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By FanofUltraman

@Redberry: Hahaha Punderful!

Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

@FanofUltraman said:

@Redberry: It's a joke. Take it as one. A straight man isn't attracted to every single woman in existence, but would likely enjoy himself in a woman's lockeroom.

Sorry, with serious atmosphere in this thread, it's hard to tell when someone just tells a joke. I did make a joke about Alan's weakness to wood, so I don't have a lot of moral high ground to stand on.

Avatar image for fanofultraman
FanofUltraman

159

Forum Posts

2330

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By FanofUltraman

@Redberry: It's a joke. Take it as one. A straight man isn't attracted to every single woman in existence, but would likely enjoy himself in a woman's lockeroom.

Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

@FanofUltraman said:

Something tells me Jay Garrick and Al Pratt won't be as comfortable with wearing tight spandex in front of Scott anymore.

Just because he's gay doesn't mean he's attracted to everyone...

Avatar image for fanofultraman
FanofUltraman

159

Forum Posts

2330

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By FanofUltraman

Something tells me Jay Garrick and Al Pratt won't be as comfortable with wearing tight spandex in front of Scott anymore.

Avatar image for boywander
BoyWander

333

Forum Posts

130

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By BoyWander

Can I still kill him with a pointy stick? If so then this changes nothing.

Avatar image for monitor_earthprime
monitor_earthprime

84

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I cannot beleive I am going to say this, but as a gay man I am Dropping this title. I have read the JSA for decades and I just cannot deal with this version of Earth 2. I am sorry, I do not see why Alan Scott has to be gay in the comics.

Avatar image for thechessclub
thechessclub

516

Forum Posts

1303

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 5

Edited By thechessclub

@SkyJK said:

They are pandering, and doing this all for money.

Yeah. Cuz it was DC that put Obama on the cover of their highest selling title back when he was elected.

Oh wait...

Marvel does that shit like a billion times more than DC.

Avatar image for redberry
Redberry

818

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Redberry

People get up in arm about this, but this is not the only thing they change about the universe. Over the years, various characters have gone through many different changes, even the skin color, and yet people don't protest as much.

Avatar image for savagedragon
SavageDragon

2257

Forum Posts

200

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Edited By SavageDragon

@SkyJK: This is in an alternate reality....

Avatar image for savagedragon
SavageDragon

2257

Forum Posts

200

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Edited By SavageDragon

@RedVelvet: You do realize this is in Earth 2 right?...This isnt normal DC continuity. Alan Scott can be hetero in the normal universe.

Avatar image for randy_rand
randy_rand

3

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By randy_rand

Oh well. All the old comics fans who are against the idea of a gay Alan Scott will be dead soon anyway - while DC comics will still need to sell comic books to the rest of us.

Avatar image for difficlus
difficlus

10659

Forum Posts

3482

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By difficlus

Not sure how this makes any sense, it feels a bit forced. But i'm just glad alan scott is back in the game!

Avatar image for randy_rand
randy_rand

3

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By randy_rand

@PulledaBrad: Gay people are normal.

Welcome to the 21st century.

Avatar image for randy_rand
randy_rand

3

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By randy_rand

@Green ankh: I wouldn't mind a Gay Universe, out there somewhere in the Multiverse. That would be fascinating.

Not sure how people would manage to procreate though. But since it's an alternate universe, perhaps such things would work differently.

Avatar image for colonyofcells
colonyofcells

2038

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By colonyofcells

The old customers tend to be against reboots and retcons including reboots to become gay. DC needs these reboots and retcons to find new customers.

I don't worry too much about gay Alan Scott and I worry more about those rats eating the crotch of Jay Garrick. ouch.

Avatar image for biteme_fanboy
BiteMe-Fanboy

8951

Forum Posts

454

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By BiteMe-Fanboy

Bad idea. But whatever. I never to much cared for Alan anyway.

Avatar image for waruikumo
waruikumo

364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 2

Edited By waruikumo

Anti Gay Alan Scott tantrums; proof again (many) comic book fans just want to see fit (straight) white males in spandex.

Avatar image for nlghtcrawler
NlGHTCRAWLER

2896

Forum Posts

1494

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

Edited By NlGHTCRAWLER

@jcbart said:

What bothers me is that the preview pages are related to his sexuality, and not to him as a superhero. If the sexuality wasn't an issue, they wouldn't be releasing pages of him kissing his partner. With Marvel it makes sense, as it's a wedding, but with this... As a gay man, I find that pretty forced upon us.

@NlGHTCRAWLER: Exactly.

THANK YOU FOR BEING AWESOME.

Avatar image for superxash
SuperXAsh

573

Forum Posts

6253

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 13

Edited By SuperXAsh

Guess we'll never get New-52 (New Coke) Jade and Obsidian then. XD

Oh well... I stopped giving a shit about DC when they went along with this "New Coke 52" stuff. So it's not like this "shocking" change to a character DC never really cared about till now (when was the last time Alan Scott was a big name character? or treated like he mattered??) will change my mind on this "Heroes Reborn 2.0" concept.

Avatar image for zorro62
zorro62

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By zorro62

DC Comics.........DON'T EVEN....Enough, don't you dare go down this trail! If gays want a " role model" look in the gay communities. If they feel that they MUST have a " role model" that's a DC comics hero CREATE a new gay hero.....If you must! Leave the icons alone!

Avatar image for royale_with_cheese
royale_with_cheese

752

Forum Posts

320

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

@spiderbat87 said:

@royale_with_cheese said:

Most people don't even know who Obsidian is, so there's no justification for making Alan Scott homosexual. Why, just why?

why not?

Because essentially, what Robinson and the staff at D.C have come out and said in response to Alan Scott being gay is that: a) Scott's homosexuality is a homage/legacy to his son Obsidian, and b) to be an honorable, dynamic and gallant leader of the Justice Society in today's day and age you have to be gay. I don't know about you, but frankly those are not valid reasons to conceal a marketing scheme. I.e. appealing to a new generation of readers by conforming to political correctness; that is LGBT.

Avatar image for oedipus_rex
Oedipus_Rex

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Oedipus_Rex

I'm going to read it but if I can't just skip over the gay story elements and still get the story, I won't keep reading it. I don't care if he's gay, I just don't want to read about it.

Avatar image for cainpanell
CainPanell

23760

Forum Posts

171

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By CainPanell

@RedVelvet said:

honestly this just about kills it for me and DC. I don't care if they made a character gay, I'm bi myself, but they've thrown decades of history out the window and effectively elimated two very cool characters in the process. As a true Green Lantern fan, the New 52 has been one long list of atrocities. 1. Sinestro is a GL 2. Hal is kicked out 3. The Guardians are plotting the masacre of the entire Corps 4. The FIRST Green Lantern has had his entire history tossed out a window 5. Jade and Obsidian will never exist I am sooooo done with DC

I Know right!? I Would have been PERFECTLY Fine if it was a character that didn't have a friggin' wife and kid previously, If it was someone that had been even SLIGHTLY Ambiguous I'd Be cool with it!

Avatar image for redvelvet
RedVelvet

40

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By RedVelvet

honestly this just about kills it for me and DC. I don't care if they made a character gay, I'm bi myself, but they've thrown decades of history out the window and effectively elimated two very cool characters in the process. As a true Green Lantern fan, the New 52 has been one long list of atrocities.
1. Sinestro is a GL
2. Hal is kicked out
3. The Guardians are plotting the masacre of the entire Corps
4. The FIRST Green Lantern has had his entire history tossed out a window
5. Jade and Obsidian will never exist

I am sooooo done with DC

Avatar image for vance_astro
vance_astro

90107

Forum Posts

51511

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 2

Edited By vance_astro  Moderator

AFFIRMATIVE ACTION...HOLLA!

Avatar image for redhood21
redhood21

833

Forum Posts

4700

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By redhood21

@Funrush said:

@redhood21 said:

Ive said it many times..new gay characters are fine, but why tinker with old characters sexuality? And in trying to be more progressive theyre kinda insulting...im not gay but im pretty sure ive read that LGBT parents dont usually raise homosexual children but to DC it was "the logical step" to have a gay characters dad be gay as well. Id be mildly offended.

Actually, said gay son no longer exists, he may not even be gay when he appears.

forgot bout that. hrhm. i wasnt too impressed with earth 2 #1 though so i guess i wont find out lol. and each issue of superboy makes me die a lil inside.

Avatar image for doomsilver
doomsilver

652

Forum Posts

361

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 13

Edited By doomsilver

I just want to see how it all goes over with the fans. I loved the New Earth Alan Scott, and I just want to see if they changed him even more.

Avatar image for funrush
Funrush

1486

Forum Posts

7151

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 2

Edited By Funrush

@redhood21 said:

Ive said it many times..new gay characters are fine, but why tinker with old characters sexuality? And in trying to be more progressive theyre kinda insulting...im not gay but im pretty sure ive read that LGBT parents dont usually raise homosexual children but to DC it was "the logical step" to have a gay characters dad be gay as well. Id be mildly offended.

Actually, said gay son no longer exists, he may not even be gay when he appears.

Avatar image for redhood21
redhood21

833

Forum Posts

4700

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By redhood21

Ive said it many times..new gay characters are fine, but why tinker with old characters sexuality? And in trying to be more progressive theyre kinda insulting...im not gay but im pretty sure ive read that LGBT parents dont usually raise homosexual children but to DC it was "the logical step" to have a gay characters dad be gay as well. Id be mildly offended.

Avatar image for battyfan1
battyfan1

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By battyfan1

was i the only one that wanted them to make Wonder Woman a lesbian.........i mean with the way she is... might as well just make it happen and get it over with.........

Avatar image for beast_in_the_shadows
Beast_in_the_Shadows

433

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

@leokearon: Exactly what I was thinking when I saw this. I mean even a parallel universe Superman or Batman doesn't really count as one of their main characters. So not only is it a parallel universe, but it's also a character that most people in comics are even that familiar with? This has all been over hyped to extreme levels if they really thought this would matter. If anything it seems almost like a slight. Kinda like saying "OK, gays. You can have Universe Two all to yourselves and we will have the normal universe"

Honestly, if they didn't make a big deal about it and just let it happen, then it would have been fine. But this just feels like a cop-out and I had been one of the ones really excited I would feel very disappointed.

Avatar image for skyjk
SkyJK

2

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By SkyJK

ANYONE who thinks that DC is doing this to be innovative or tolerant is fooling themselves. They are pandering, and doing this all for money. This shows that DC doesn't care about their loyal fans, who have followed characters their whole life. They only care about making money, and they will erase and change anything to make that happen. They are playing it safe by having it be a character that hasn't really been in the main public spotlight lately, and who isn't part of the official main DC universe. If his sexuality really doesn't matter, then why are all the previews simply focusing on him being gay now? There is nothing there to build up my interest in the story. And, I can almost guarantee all of that happens at the very end of the story. It's all just tacked for the publicity. If their sexuality or race is the most interesting part about your character you are advertising, then you're doomed for failure. And, if people are willing to read a comic simply because there is a gay person in it, without caring about the story or anything else...that's sad. You are just buying into DC's money trap.

This is the middle finger to fans because ALL of his history is gone. He's NOT the same character, he's still a "leader" and he's "likable" but those two things do NOT make a character who they are. It's their experiences, their failures, their loves, their full life. Alan had to deal with his failed past marriage, he had to deal with his children and his son being gay. Alan Scott after years realized that he has always loved Harlequin, it was a love strong enough that he was WILLING TO GO TO HELL AND BATTLE FOR HER ETERNAL SOUL. Then, when she was aged to an old woman he still stuck with her and they were happy. It's not just that he is gay now, but that's the icing on the cake. They have rebooted and destroyed everything about the character, things that I very much liked and that they will never be able to redo the same. It's not Alan Scott anymore, it's just another likable leader with his name. And, THAT is an insult to long time fans. Let's see them change Obsidian when he is reintroduced and make him straight. That would be straight up bullsh*t. But oh, he's the same character that everyone has always liked. This proves that DC don't care about their fans and are willing to do anything to the characters they love just to make a buck.

If Marvel decided to somehow have Scarlet Witch resurrect her "real" children, and Wiccan disappeared and was replaced with a copy who was now straight...I would seriously consider dropping Marvel comics. Well, this is the same thing. Except, adding to the fact they have already erased so much...it's easy. I'm dropping DC.

Avatar image for funrush
Funrush

1486

Forum Posts

7151

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 2

Edited By Funrush

Huh... who would have thought. I was guessing it'd be Wally West.

Well, don't care much about Scott's sexual orientation, he can be gay or straight, doesn't really matter to me, just a bit mad that DC is changing preexisting characters.

@SpitfireINK said:

Why exactly is it that we are making the relationship the center point of this issue?

And this preview page - Why is it relevant to the story at all? or Allan Scott's character for that matter?

I really don't care if its not RELEVANT to STORY DEVELOPMENT. - period.

Only thing that bothers me is how its being handled - even with X-Men - its being done for shock value and nothing more.

and if that's not the case - then how come there aren't some major revelations as to other relationships?

Just like Politics or Religion - KEEP them OUT - UNLESS THEY REALLY MATTER!

I Agree with this. I hope Alan and Samuel both play a role in the story arc if they feel the need to put a few pages about them.

@Ston3face said:

I feel like comics are becoming gayified (not a real word). It makes no since to me to make Alan Scott gay as opposed to introducing a new character who can be gay. I'm all about inclusiveness but being too politically correct can become insulting to everyone. Frankly I think these pro-gay decisions lately are all about dollars.

Agree with what you're saying except for the last sentence. But yeah, I don't think DC should change currently established characters, they should just make new ones.

Avatar image for ston3face
Ston3face

95

Forum Posts

459

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

Edited By Ston3face

I feel like comics are becoming gayified (not a real word). It makes no since to me to make Alan Scott gay as opposed to introducing a new character who can be gay. I'm all about inclusiveness but being too politically correct can become insulting to everyone. Frankly I think these pro-gay decisions lately are all about dollars.

Avatar image for dmc
DMC

2008

Forum Posts

22629

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 1

Edited By DMC

Well at least it wasn't the Earth 1 Green Lantern, still unfortunate though.

Avatar image for savagedragon
SavageDragon

2257

Forum Posts

200

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

Edited By SavageDragon

At my local comic shop a couple weeks back I guessed it would be Guy Gardner....Guess I wasn't that far off.

Avatar image for darkmount1
Darkmount1

1535

Forum Posts

19439

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 12

Edited By Darkmount1

Thank you, idea of alternate universes.

Avatar image for revamp
ReVamp

23014

Forum Posts

8330

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 13

Edited By ReVamp

ReVamp Supports. Even though he likes Jade.

Avatar image for innervenom123
InnerVenom123

29886

Forum Posts

1786

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 1

Edited By InnerVenom123

@jonnystorm777 said:

@InnerVenom123: Dude, you need to quit trying to start controversy. You have no life.

I didn't say I was going to start controversy.

Learn to read past a second grade level.

I said I was awaiting the controversy that would develop on its own.