@oldnightcrawler:
That's an interesting way to look at it, and probably the way that makes this story most interesting for me.That Cyclops (and Emma and Magik, but mostly Cyclops) is basically in exile from the rest of the X-men -whether justly or not- gives him a more singular role than the other X-men collectively and highlights his own strength as a character/leader.
You're 100% right, so why are they stuck in doing almost regular X-Men obligations?
Seeing Cyclops as the competent leader of one of the largest and most powerful superhero teams on Earth (the X-men) is a role we've already seen him in, and isn't really that interesting for him or the X-men for that reason. Seeing him have to build a completely new team out of nothing but persecuted mutant kids and his dedication to his cause just seems way more interesting, to me, because a less experienced team makes the danger more tangible and victory, or even survival, less assured.
From nothing? You consider Magneto, Magic and Emma Frost (though she shouldn't even be here) "nothing"? I don't. Until Bendis, they were: one of the most powerful psychics, the feared master of magnetism, and a ruler of demonic dimension. It's a pretty good "beginning of a new era" I'd say. Anyway, more vulnerable for the sake of it? It's not something that we didn't see, "broken powers and kids against governmental machine" is no innovation, and it isn't that good to begin with, not when something bigger felt to be already settled by another, competent writer, whom Bendis decided to completely ignore.
It also makes the other X-men more interesting as they have to step up into the many roles formerly held by Cyclops for so long as the head of the team, even while many of their decisions are framed by what they see as his mistakes.
Yeah, and I'm still waiting for their competence to be seen, because right now still I haven't. I guess that's what K/Y are for.
As for being inactive, I disagree. I think coming into direct conflict with law enforcement to rescue mutants counts as active. I think training those mutants counts as active. I think training them to survive as outlaws against SHIELD definitely counts as active (not to mention Sentinels, Dormammu, or Tabula Rasa). And, as you point out, Cyclops has also been active without the students in situations where they could hold him back, like at the Sentinel base.
Is this enough? I would expect the world-wide mutant-containment policy to be exposed a little more, all they did for damn 18 issues (ok, I'll give you that, minus 3 Dormammu issues, 2 BOTA issues, and we stand on 13 now) is saving 5 kids, "wow". That's what I call directionless.
Part of him being a great strategist is because of his experience, which includes making the most out of the team he has. Yeah, right now he's mostly got a bunch of shocked kids with little to no field training, but that's all he had -all he was- when he first lead characters like Beast and the Angel to fight Magneto. When Cyclops and the other X-men started, they'd only been training for a matter of weeks before they were fighting insane terrorists with super powers. And they didn't have a kid who could heal their wounds, stop time, or teleport them to safety. This team at least has the collective experience of Cyclop, Emma, and Magik, even without their own game-changing range of powers.
Again, it isn't that part a mature writing I'd expect after Consequences. Do we really need a comparison with classics of a (then) pretty one-dimensional franchise that didn't even work until ANAD? Or what you try to say is they are using these kids BECAUSE their powers are broken? That's pretty low I guess. Another point of that letter he left for Wolverine was he, Cyclops, isn't going to be a school anymore, he isn't going to be that "Marvin Sue" to do the popular stuff, it is right there in the end of Consequences, he maybe hates himself for killing Xavier, but knowing the positive "consequences" of the whole confrontation - mutants are back, no matter the cost. Pretty extreme person I find, don't you? Is it the same person that's written by Bendis? After that whole OOC BOTA/O5 mess I can't even say I consider him that undeniably skilled strategist and a superior leader. Of course, thanks to Bendis.
Besides, he's not making X-force, he's making X-men, so training should be implicit in the theme. Cyclops' (and Emma's, for that matter) strength as a character lies in his ability to lead, so it just makes him that much more interesting to have to lead an untested team, because, ultimately, that's more of a test of his leadership than moving a bunch of experienced professionals around the board.
Isn't he? I thought that is up to you and me to decide, and that was supposed to be the most beautiful part of it. He is the new type of X-man that asked Danger to scar an "X" allover that man's face. And do we really need to test him and his ability to lead after everything he pulled X-men out of since Decimation?
See, I like all of that stuff about the X-men too, I'm just saying that that's all stuff that you can get from lots of superhero comics, whereas the concept of mutants in training has always been more particular to the X-men, and therefore one of the most central and distinct themes. To take that element away just makes it something else.
If you want
- beautiful metaphors,
- favorite characters,
- diversified powersets and
- us-vs-the-world stuff
those things already exist is every other superhero team. What the X-men have that make them distinct, what the X-men are, is a school. Sure, that doesn't have to be the focus of every story, but it should at least be part of the context or premise.
What makes X-men more distinct and relevant is a beautiful humanity-criticizing aspect that, like you said, can be seen almost everywhere, but not on the same level of relevance. No franchise has Magneto, X-Forces, Weapon X's, Darwinism-driven questions, cosmic level footsies and above this all, no franchise actually makes you question yourself if the normal rules by which we live everyday might be not so morally just or accurate. All this is hidden in one little "mutant" metaphor, only waiting for a right writer to show up and exploit something more than the same 30 years old "civil rights" aspect. Literally, "living weapons" are compared to minorities as the most ponderable metaphor? I want more.
Log in to comment