Follow

    Wolverine

    Character » Wolverine appears in 16062 issues.

    A long-lived mutant with the rage of a beast and the soul of a Samurai, James "Logan" Howlett's once mysterious past is filled with blood, war, and betrayal. Possessing an accelerated healing factor, keenly enhanced senses, and bone claws in each hand (along with his skeleton) that are coated in adamantium; Wolverine is, without question, the ultimate weapon.

    Off My Mind: Are Characters Cooler With or Without a Mysterious Past?

    • 67 results
    • 1
    • 2
    Avatar image for gmanfromheck
    gmanfromheck

    42524

    Forum Posts

    259238

    Wiki Points

    192642

    Followers

    Reviews: 472

    User Lists: 2

    Edited By gmanfromheck
    No Caption Provided
    A character with a mysterious past can be really cool. It gives them a certain vibe and makes you want to find out more about them. This doesn't always work. People got really upset when they had to wait two years to find out who Red Hulk was. 
     
    I like to use Wolverine as an example in the knowing/not knowing the past argument. These days, I know a lot of people are tired of his multiple appearances everywhere. Once upon a time, he was actually a really cool character (I still think he's kind of cool). We had this tough and deadly little mutant who didn't know anything about his past. We would slowly find things out like about his past as a "samurai" or I remember when he was talking to Puck about the Spanish Civil War (or some other war from a while ago).  The fact that he had a mysterious past and had lived for so long added to the appeal of his character.
     
    After Wolverine: Origin we found out a lot about his past and at the end of House Of M, he remembered everything. Did this reveal make him less cool?
     == TEASER ==
    No Caption Provided
    I find that I don't care as much about Wolverine as I used to. We also now know Red Hulk's secret as well. I actually haven't heard any feedback from readers. As I mentioned, people complained about not knowing who he was. Are those readers happy now that they know? Was the reveal to their satisfaction? Personally I was happy with the way things turned out but part of me liked it a little better not knowing. Maybe I'm just patient and could've waited a little loner to enjoy the mystery. 
     
    Playing the guessing game can be fun. As long as it's clear that there is a an answer to the mystery. Once it's out, the character is on a new path. You can't go back (unless a writer does some comic book trickery or retcons the past).  I think not knowing almost makes you feel like you're part of the comic book universe. The "civilians" see masked superheroes all the time and have no idea who they could be. It's not often that we get characters that we can look at that way. I think Red Hulk is a good example that today's readers simply want the answers as soon as possible. It was decades before we got Wolverine's full story and (as you can see above), Red Hulk's secret didn't even last two years.
     
    I don't think we need to know everything at once. Let's just sit back and enjoy the stories. There's no need to skip to the end. I think people just need a little Patience.
    Avatar image for ryu_batman
    RYU/BATMAN

    461

    Forum Posts

    8695

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 6

    #1  Edited By RYU/BATMAN

    So should the answer be revealed of a hero or villains past. Be answered in a year or so, or maybe as long as Wolverines origin?

    Avatar image for mr__kamikaze
    Mr. Kamikaze

    834

    Forum Posts

    623

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #2  Edited By Mr. Kamikaze

    I think it depends on the character. I didn't mind knowing Wolverine's past, that whole thing could've only been played for so long, eventually I wouldn't even care and the mystery behind it would've been irrelevant anyways. Red Hulk....was depressing, did not like who he was revealed to be and frankly I found myself not caring to begin with. 
     
    But characters like the Joker, full on anarchy. I don't mind not knowing much about his past. It makes his maniacal attitude far superior. 

    Avatar image for kanasaurs
    kanasaurs

    13

    Forum Posts

    7

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #3  Edited By kanasaurs

    I never want to know Rogue's full 'real' name EVER.

    Avatar image for e_i_s_a_m_
    E.I.S.A.M.

    365

    Forum Posts

    4

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #4  Edited By E.I.S.A.M.

    The answer's only necessary when it's good. They didn't have a good story for Wolverine and Sentry, just to name a few, so they shouldn't have told us anything until they did.  
     
    P.S. Paul Jenkins shouldn't be writing origins.

    Avatar image for icemizer
    Icemizer

    181

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #5  Edited By Icemizer

    Characters are much cooler without us knowing every single thing about them. I agree Wolverine was a much better character before he knew everything. Now? Just another Mutie. 
    From a readers perspective I find the different takes by multiple writers over the decades to be more interesting when little is known about the characters past. The Joker has had so many origins that I have lost count. Many of them have been interesting but even the worst has been better than seeing Peter Parkers origin retold for the one zillionth time.  
    When a mini series is released telling us the beginning of a character I am at once excited about it and also unhappy. This knowing how he/she began as a hero/villian gives a realism to the character but also eliminates further story opportunities down the line. The story can also be told so poorly or drawn so badly that I would rather not have the story told at all. 
    I never needed to know who the RULK was. Knowing didnt really add to the story in any way. The definitive origin of Deadshot from several years ago didnt really add anything to that character either and I am really not looking forward to the secret origin of the Taskmaster either. Every character doesnt need their story told. Its the mystery itself that sells the character to the public.

    Avatar image for wikiwickerman
    wikiwickerman

    60

    Forum Posts

    562

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #6  Edited By wikiwickerman

    I think when a character has a secret past it's cool, but I would have to agree that one has to know that the characters story will be revealed eventually. What I don't like about origin stories is that everything seems to be revealed really quickly, so you have to wait for the origin for years and then everything is revealed within a couple issues as if the writers are bored with story now. 
     
    And Wolverine remembered everything? Not remembering stuff was what he based on pretty much! (Hulk is the only marvel comic I read)

    Avatar image for kattvonnoir
    KattVonNoir

    273

    Forum Posts

    60

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #7  Edited By KattVonNoir

    It depends on the character, umm I'll use Emma Frost as an example we didnt know much about her past from before she decided to join the Hellfire club, what her motivations were, or really anything at all about the time before that. When her mini series came out about her family, time in school/college, and what she went through it made her so much more interesting. I really felt sorry for her and it added a whole other side to her character we hadn't really seen before! Some characters don't really need that though... Unless it is written really well, but then again I am always interested in findinh out what drives characters.
    Avatar image for supremomaximo
    SupremoMaximo

    223

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 6

    #8  Edited By SupremoMaximo

    A character's past and mystery is like a book.  You keep reading a book because it's a good story, but eventually you want the book to end (for the most part).  But once the book is over, you should feel some sort of accomplishment and satisfaction from the enjoyment of experiencing the story.  
     
    As long as the continued story brings up more questions that aren't convoluted we should keep reading.

    Avatar image for bandito
    Bandito

    188

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #9  Edited By Bandito

    Yes, some characters should remain mysterious because it is part of essence of the character. 
      
    Wolverine is one, Snake Eyes from G.I. Joe is another.  We can get teases of their past, we can get glimpses because those only build the mystery, but ultimately we don't want to know everything.  Part of Wolverine's driving angst was that he didn't even know his past and it created limitless story potential.  Once Marvel opened the box, they limited the stories.  Eventually, Wolverine will be able to resolve his past issues and get closure.  That's horrible!  And boring! 
     
    Larry Hama was brilliant about handling Snake Eyes' origins back in the '80s.  He fed you crumbs--lots of crumbs, admittedly--but the delivery built a puzzle that still lacked a few crucial pieces.  Once enough of the puzzle was finished, though, Snake Eyes lost his mystery feel.  His amazing feats and combat prowess didn't seem so amazing or supernatural, they seemed... human
     
    The other character who should always, always be a mystery is the Joker.  Yes, there have been some solid Joker origin stories told over the years, but the fact that they're all different and contradictory helps build the mystery.  No one handled this better than Christopher Nolan and Heath Ledger in The Dark Knight, when the Joker told different people different reasons for his scarred face.  That was so incredibly gratifying because it was true to the essence of the character, the truth that Batman knows: the Joker is not a man, he's a force of nature.

    Avatar image for rasx
    rasx

    251

    Forum Posts

    48

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 7

    #10  Edited By rasx

    I still like Wolverine after his origin reveal, but Rulk seems kinda boring now.
    Avatar image for shipwreck
    Shipwreck

    119

    Forum Posts

    10

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #11  Edited By Shipwreck

    I think they killed Wolverine when they gave him a past. I agree with Chris Claremont, Logan was created to be mysterious. Not to be given some weak story about how his came about. I like the explanation in my Stan Lee far better than any origin tale. " He came over in 1492 and got lost." There is more to think about. There is more to dream about. Now that Wolverine's past is told that luster about him is gone.

    Avatar image for timm
    Timm

    271

    Forum Posts

    282

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 11

    User Lists: 2

    #12  Edited By Timm

    i like the James Howlett wolverine origin angle (however, i like the James Hudson / Jimmy Howlett Junior angle in ultimate X more). i think that for a hero to know why he does what he does, he should know who he is and where he is from. origins stick better when you have that deep seeded unforgettable 'thing' that makes them go out there and do it.

    Avatar image for gennadius
    Gennadius

    265

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #13  Edited By Gennadius

    Maybe things should be revealed after a while but still have a few lies in it, (like when Al in spawn thought he was sterile-> then he found out he actually had a kid but killed it,then she lived-> blablabla XD)
    Avatar image for comiclove5
    Comiclove5

    1304

    Forum Posts

    837

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 12

    User Lists: 2

    #14  Edited By Comiclove5

    I liked Wolverine even after his past was reaveled and he remembered everything. But if the only good thing about a character is the fact that we don't know anything about them or their past, then that's not a good character and it's not worth buying a comic about them. I agree some characters should keep their past a mystery but some shouldn't. Basically as long as it isn't Dragged out and badly written. I'm pefectly fine with it.
    Avatar image for kid_zombie
    Kid_Zombie

    824

    Forum Posts

    32

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #15  Edited By Kid_Zombie

    I think characters are super cool with mysterious pasts especially wolverine. And yes i think he is less cool now ha ha. I think though it got to the point that the writers and readers wanted something new. And Wolverine knowing his past is something new to him. It was the same thing for years, its good to change it up sometimes. People hate change, and i think thats a big thing with comic fans. But the way I look at it is, we had 70 years of the same stuff, its good to change it up once in awhile.

    Avatar image for ensabahnurx
    EnSabahNurX

    2321

    Forum Posts

    248

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #16  Edited By EnSabahNurX

    I like when a character has some mystery and prefer when characters like the joker dont have such a definite origin. Besides little glimpses and hints to the characters overall past leaves more fun for the reader who can try to solve the mystery before it is revealed at a later time. But I don't believe the entire origin should be revealed all at once either.

    Avatar image for airdave817
    deactivated-579fe0ae58107

    1321

    Forum Posts

    12134

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 304

    User Lists: 27

    I dunno...The Joker has always been cool, and there is very little known about him 'cept that he was a two-bit gimmick crook known as The Red Hood...but even that seems like a retro-fit from the late '40's-early '50's. While The Killing Joke is brilliant - it spoils the character a little. A liitle TMI. I think I like not knowing everything about a character. 

    Avatar image for bingbangboom
    bingbangboom

    782

    Forum Posts

    814

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 4

    #18  Edited By bingbangboom

    I loved Wolverine Origin book, wished they would do more of it because I believe there are a ton of stories there. Red Hulk, not so much, just read some of it and it just seems bad and way too campy. The whole thing with him being someone we have known for a while, didn't really help the "mystery" or anything because it was everyone's first guess when they said "no it isn't". Just kind of stupid and bad writing and planning by Loeb.

    Avatar image for daggerklutz
    DaggerKlutz

    3078

    Forum Posts

    1352

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 1

    #19  Edited By DaggerKlutz

    I say it depends on the character. Take Batman and Joker for example. Batman has a strong origin that is important to his character, it actually helps us understand why he choose to be a hero and why a bat-theme. If we didn't know something would be missing and he wouldn't be that cool Batman we all enjoy. 
     
    On the other hand the Joker has no definite origin. He has many different takes and none of them can be the real origin. This is sort of fun. He is the character that people like the try to figure out, he is an interesting puzzle. This adds more to his insanity/super-sanity and puts a new layer onto his character. 
     
    I think it's the character that determines if a known past is better than the mystery of an unknown origin. Some can pull off a good origin while others are meant to remain unknown.

    Avatar image for shadowdoggy
    Shadowdoggy

    3868

    Forum Posts

    617

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #20  Edited By Shadowdoggy

    I think a mysterious past can help a character have depth, but I don't think it's enough to carry a character who isn't worth it
    Avatar image for green_ankh
    Green ankh

    1104

    Forum Posts

    3197

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 39

    User Lists: 3

    #21  Edited By Green ankh

    Wolverine should have stayed hush hush. But Red hulk's story was driven to find out.
    Avatar image for thunderscream
    Thunderscream

    2746

    Forum Posts

    510

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 0

    #22  Edited By Thunderscream

    I liked Rogue alot better before the all this "Anna Marie" crap surfaced. I preferred her as Mystique's foster daughter still running from the demons in her past.

    Avatar image for goldenkey
    goldenkey

    3033

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #23  Edited By goldenkey

    They needed to do Wolverines orgin.  With everything they put in it   What did we really find out that we didn't know?  He's a Hudson, big deal.  It's the other stuff that can be dealt with in so many ways.  So many mini-series showing him Japan, WW1, WW2, Weapon X spy etc, etc, etc.  He's so damn old I think it would have been even better if they made him even older.   So much more to play with.  With the popularity of Wolverine and his enemies you can go back with and do a mini-series his long living enemies as well.  Sabertooth, Omega Red, Romulus.  The Red Hulk was driven on who he is, and I still want to know where his mustache goes when he turns into the Hulk.  The Joker NEEDS to be mysterious tho.  You find out his history and you find out the man.  I love the synapse of having a bad day changing him from "Killing Joke"  The books is a classic, arguably the best batman story ever, at least the best one shot, and every time someone writes a possible background story it seems watered down and just weak.  I think everyone looks at Killing Joke as Jokers orgin. 
    Avatar image for logan48227
    logan48227

    299

    Forum Posts

    22

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #24  Edited By logan48227

    I think a mysterious character works only if there are other elements to the character that are worth caring about. Wolverine may have been more interesting when his past was a mystery, but he's still an interesting character now that we know his back story. The loyalty he has to his friends, his berserker tendencies, and his "eye for an eye" brand of justice are all things that made him interesting back in the day as well as they do right now. I could do without 100 appearances by the guy, but he's still a unique character.

    Avatar image for sora_thekey
    sora_thekey

    8812

    Forum Posts

    18983

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 31

    User Lists: 8

    #25  Edited By sora_thekey

    In the case of Wolverine, I think since the mystery lasted so long the character became a favorite, so when that huge change happened then the 'cool' stayed...
    It needs to be a looong mystery for the character to stay cool after that mystery is solved.

    Avatar image for extrememage
    extrememage

    194

    Forum Posts

    1681

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #26  Edited By extrememage

    a mysterious past does make a character interesting, but at the same time there are many other characterisitcs that make a character interesting, like weaknesses and relationships with people. to be honest though it does seem that some writers could use the fact that a character doesnt have a past to make things easier for themselves whiel writing and just make things up as they go along
    Avatar image for 04nbod
    04nbod

    191

    Forum Posts

    21940

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 1

    #27  Edited By 04nbod

    Anyone who knows of River Song knows the answer is without.

    Avatar image for scorpius72
    scorpius72

    74

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #28  Edited By scorpius72

    it depends on the writting. everybody and their grandmother knows Batmans story and hes still the essence of cool  in comics.  
    what doesnt make a character cool is over saturation. too much exposure i think lessens the characters appeal. Wolverine for example is in everything ,movies, cartoons, comics, books, 7-11 cups, video games, clothes. after about 30years of next to nothing.  i know, so is batman, but wolverine has changed in the way hes portrayed. hes a leader?? since when?
    only recently did he get an origin story and they havent stopped dissecting this character.  to me, hes lost his cool, mysterious or not.
    Avatar image for yescas
    yescas

    84

    Forum Posts

    1279

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 22

    #29  Edited By yescas

    I thnk it all depends on the character.  
    Wolverine for example needed to be mysterious but after so many years, we readers demanded the origin, which was not bad. Now having his origin we need to see how it affected the character. The writers have to get focused with the change or the character can have a great origin but nothing left after that. 
    The Joker is a character that is ok without an origin, he was meant to not have one and not need one. He has so many origins told that I think I should stack them together under Joker's Origins and see how many I can find in my collection. 
    As for Rulk, if you look at the story it was there, it was planned so the story was driving to that point anyway. This is one of the origin stories that are defined by the current arc or story and are going to be as good as the story can be. 
    What do you guys think of the Ultimate Origins series?

    Avatar image for scorpius72
    scorpius72

    74

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 3

    #30  Edited By scorpius72

    it depends on the writting. mystery doesnt always make someoen 'cool'. a great character is interesting no matter his background.  
     everybody and their grandmother knows Batmans story and hes still the essence of cool  in comics.  
    what doesnt make a character cool is oversaturation. too much exposure i think lessens the characters appeal. Wolverine for example is in everything ,movies, cartoons, comics, books, 7-11 cups, video games, clothes. after about 30years of next to nothing.  i know, so is batman, but batman has been the same dark man he always was. wolverine has changed in the way hes portrayed. he isnt the same lone wolf, hes more accessable to kids which is a reflection of his popularity. hes 'sold out' in a way.
    only recently did he get an origin story and they havent stopped dissecting this character.   
    to me, hes lost his cool, mysterious or not.      
    Avatar image for dmc
    DMC

    2008

    Forum Posts

    22629

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 18

    User Lists: 1

    #31  Edited By DMC

    Hey G-Man I'm surprised she wasn't one of your examples. 
     
     

    No Caption Provided
    If I remember correctly you (and others I'm sure) didn't find her as appealing after Marvel spilled the beans in the Spider-Man Annual
    Avatar image for obscurefan
    obscurefan

    297

    Forum Posts

    3967

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 9

    User Lists: 4

    #32  Edited By obscurefan

    They're cooler up to a point, then they can become really annoying and you just want them to get on with it.

    Avatar image for cosmic_sentinel
    Cosmic Sentinel

    3733

    Forum Posts

    8657

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 5

    #33  Edited By Cosmic Sentinel

    I preferred not knowing Wolverine's origins, although I thought the story was good it just didn't add anything to his character. Rulk was different, we knew from the beginning that he was tied to the Hulk and that needed an explanation. More generally, not having a defined origin allows writers to all add their own little piece to the mystery of a character and if there's contradictions, all the better to stir up debate among fans over what's really true.

    Avatar image for joe_venom
    Joe Venom

    1290

    Forum Posts

    468

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 3

    #34  Edited By Joe Venom

     For a mysterious past to work properly you need an interesting character that deserves it, Wolverine earn that and everything else he got from the MU, while characters like Rulk and Hitman Monkey are brought into the MU as a mystery and shoved in our face before we were given a chance to decide whether or not we like the characters. 

    Avatar image for cbishop
    cbishop

    21161

    Forum Posts

    393968

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 92

    User Lists: 1268

    #35  Edited By cbishop

    The only thing I didn't like about Wolverine's "Origin," was that it was heralded as somehow negating "Weapon X."  I think the two work fine together.  Origin tells his earliest history, and Weapon X tells how he got the adamantium skeleton. 
     
    My favorite example of mystery origins though is in Savage Dragon.  We didn't know for 10 years (+/-) what his origin was, and now that we do, I'm only more intrigued.  All along, Dragon would basically say, "I don't know my history, so I'm looking to the future.  No biggie," and that was frankly enough for me.  When it was revealed though, it answered a lot of questions, and hinted at so many stories to come, if you know the series.  I'm very interested to see what happens there. 
     
    Didn't follow Red Hulk, but they had to reveal who he was sooner or later.  If they went too long, readers might start to assume that he was another of Bruce's colorful personalities, somehow manifested separate from green Hulk. 
     
    As for Joker, I've always preferred the Red Hood origin, but I didn't really want to know who the Red Hood was.  Knowing his origin (or the one he remembers this time) didn't lessen the Joker for me.  What did that was when they made him just a homicidal maniac.  The Joker was originally a criminal genius - crazy as a loon, but a genius.  He knew chemistry and all sorts of other stuff, and now, he's just crazy.  Blah. 
     
    How much have they revealed about Mystique?  I haven't followed her very closely, but they originally hinted that her and Nightcrawler might be related.  I don't really know what they've said since then, but I hope they don't say too much.  Otherwise, her name becomes a misnomer.

    Avatar image for leokearon
    leokearon

    1970

    Forum Posts

    5595

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 6

    User Lists: 2

    #36  Edited By leokearon

    I like a good mystery where the reader can try and figure out stuff using the various clues, Loeb does the opposite giving clues to everyone but the actual suspect
    Avatar image for simoc375
    simonchan

    122

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 0

    #37  Edited By simonchan
    @cbishop:  +1
    Avatar image for tadthuggish
    TadThuggish

    73

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #38  Edited By TadThuggish

    I have to say that Origin (the limited series) made me care about Wolverine in a way I haven't in years.  Yes, part of the fun was the mysteriousness, but at the same time it made him very unrelatable: an issue which Origin addressed.
     
    There is something very, very special about mystery and a mysterious character.  Honestly it's one of my favorite tropes, as I hold equal interest and fear in the unknown.  There are some characters whose sheer mysteriousness makes them notable to me (the Watcher, the Mad Monk).  Then there are guys who started out myserious, like Wolverine, but as time went on more and more was revealed.  One could claim rightfully so, since they had already given so much away.
     
    Then there's Red Hulk, who was complete bullshit and just a quick cash grab.  It didn't matter "who it really was" because the character was poorly written in the first place, and his existence was entirely driven by the monetary gain OF the eventual reveal.

    Avatar image for magian
    Magian

    159096

    Forum Posts

    925

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 4

    User Lists: 11

    #39  Edited By Magian

    They should have a mysterious past if it is answered at some point and not keep delaying it.
    Avatar image for tyler_starke
    Tyler Starke

    4328

    Forum Posts

    134

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #40  Edited By Tyler Starke

    yes keep characters pasts mysterious and keep characters love lives justtttt out of reach. when everything is explained and honky dorey, it starts to get sloppy and boring.

    Avatar image for kingnomolos
    KingNomolos

    131

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #41  Edited By KingNomolos

    I like wolverine now that he know about himself, and the guys lived so long its not like WE know everything he's been through. I like wolverine back in the day when he was just trying to remember but I think that was getting played out, i mean the best tributes of great characters is if they can survive Great changes and I feel wolverine is a good example of this. Though i still dont like that fact that he is in almost every marvel comic...I think thats whats killing him more than having an origion.
    Avatar image for xerox_kitty
    xerox_kitty

    17342

    Forum Posts

    275139

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 15

    User Lists: 22

    #42  Edited By xerox_kitty

    With.  Simple as that.  When they take away the mystery, it's usually with a crappy origin story that'll be rewritten several times.

    Avatar image for phantomzxro
    phantomzxro

    39

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #43  Edited By phantomzxro

    I think characters are cooler when you don't know their past. That is how it works with every character in my opinion. It does not make them any less of a character but having a bit of mystery about you will always make you seem more interesting.
    Avatar image for darkcloakx
    darkcloakx

    788

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #44  Edited By darkcloakx

    Gambit is mysterious to me and always has been i know he likes rogue but has the connection to mister sinister. that's part of the reason why i like him.  
     

    No Caption Provided
     
    same thing with sabertooth  he always hated wolverine  and still mysterious to me because of the fact that he always trying to kill wolverine. 
     
     some characters should stay mysterious because its what's make them interesting and some should not. 
    Avatar image for rosebunse
    Rosebunse

    156

    Forum Posts

    40

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #45  Edited By Rosebunse

    I don't think we should put Wolverine, Joker, and Hulk in the same blender.  Wolverine was around for years before we found out who he was. I personally like it. We now know that he's some old guy who life screwed him up, and is more reliable because of it. It makes his whole relationship with other characters more organic because we know he's not faking it. And we got Daken out of it. All is well. 
    Joker is suppose to be unrelatable. Sure, we all have our own theories, but that's all they are. I don't want to know who he is because then he would just be another guy. But without it, he's the Joker. 
    And then there's Rulk, who is such a Sue that he makes fanon characters look realistic. Knowing he's, you know, has actually made me rethink the character...kinda...Rulk is still dumb.
    Avatar image for amazingspidermike
    AmazingSpiderMike

    148

    Forum Posts

    3

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    I would have to say that characters are much cooler with mysterious past. But we live in a society of "need to knowers" and can be bothered by "secrets". But once the secret is out than the character is no longer a big deal. For instance Wolverine and The Rulk.

    Avatar image for gylan_thomas
    Gylan Thomas

    2755

    Forum Posts

    1595

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 8

    #47  Edited By Gylan Thomas

    I think the difference betweeb red HULK and Wolverine is we did have some idea who Wolverine was. We didn't know much about his past but we knew he was Logan and that even hee didn't know much else.
     
    With RULK we were offered this character who was just pure mystery and nothing else.
    Couple that with the fact he's possibly the laziest creation in all of comic history and that'll annoy fan's.
     
    I can't speak for anyone else but the eventual reveal of RULK and SHE RULK's identities I think it sucks.
    Marvel's character's have long had the best supporting casts in comics and recently some feckin' eejit has decided it'd be a great idea to make the mall super.
     
    That sucks.

    Avatar image for dragonzeye
    dragonzeye

    3

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #48  Edited By dragonzeye

     It depends upon the writing: are the writer(s) any good at characterization, are the writer(s) good at keeping that aura of mystery for that specific character in contrast to the other cast of characters no matter how prominent or brief their role may be in the story, and how effective are the writer(s) in baiting the reader with tid-bits of information here and there through the life of the mysterious character. 
     
    Daken was advertised as the new mysterious character when he first graced the pages of  Wolverine Origins, and depending on how ya felt, you either didn't like how his character was handled or were okay with it, although in Dark Wolverine, Dark Avengers, and New Avengers other writers were able to interpret Daken's persona and give it growth.
     
    Fantomex is another mysterious character that the readership still doesn't know next to jack beyond his basic background and some details here and there that have been revealed. Unlike Daken its true that Marvel has been sparingly using Fantomex (although that may change). 
     
    If handled right, I like the occasional mysterious character, but would a story be considered boring/watered down if all the characters in a comic had mysterious pasts?

    Avatar image for nutzac4888
    nutzac4888

    49

    Forum Posts

    87

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 0

    #49  Edited By nutzac4888

    I think it's cool when a character has a mysterious past.  A character like Wolverine went how long before anyone actually knew where he came from and I'm pretty sure no readers died over it, if they did I'm sorry.  I just think that today people want everything right away and when they don't get it, they piss and moan until they do.  More characters need to come out where very little is known about their past and bits and pieces are slowly revealed over time.  It took what 2 years for the identity of the Red-Hulk to be disclosed?  That's not nearly long enough to keep dedicated readers hooked on the aura that the character had brought to the table.  I guess it's just easier to get the origins crap out of the way than it is to let readers ponder it a while and come up with all kinds of crazy theories.  I think the whole mysterious past thing is being wasted on readers that want instant satisfaction rather than actually sticking to what they are reading and seeing it through to wherever it may go.  It's a shame that more characters can't come out and have this mysteriousness about them without it being ruined a few issues later.  Let the drama build for a while so when the actual information is divulged...it is that much sweeter.

    Avatar image for reversenegative
    ReverseNegative

    2974

    Forum Posts

    2545

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 16

    User Lists: 6

    #50  Edited By ReverseNegative

    As long as it's done by a good writer.

    This edit will also create new pages on Comic Vine for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Comic Vine users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.