He seems to be in every second marvel issue these days. To be honest I buy and collect a ton of books and don't really have much time to read a lot of them, but when I do it more often than not will be a wolverine related issue.

This was going to be in the X-Men forum but I cant seem to get posts to go there.

As far as his multiple titles goes:
 
I do not care.
 
As far as him being the center of X-Men comics: This irritates me.

yes and no

im way more sick of deadpool than i am of wolverine. so not really. then again i dont really read xmen too much so maybe i would feel differently about him if i did

I'd say he's been done to death, but his healing factor prevents that.

I'm sick of superman

Yes

i like wolverine but at the same time i know many overrate him, the biggest problem with his over use is that eventually people will get sick of it even the hardcore fanboys at some point will be saying its too much then itll start losing money which will cause the character to eventually be cast aside

See, it's interesting. Sometimes I'll sit there and enjoy reading about him tearing people apart, whilst other times I want to fly to America and punch Len Wein in the face for creating him. 
But, to be truthful, I don't care what Marvel does with him as long as he stays the hell out of the Avengers. Put him in the X-Books? Fine. Have him in his own titles? Fine. Don't care. Put him in the New Avengers? No. That's idiotic. Not only does his involvement ALWAYS feel forced, he just lacks the depth of (cough) better (cough), I mean "other", characters in the book.

" wolviepool rules suckers! "

" NEVER WILL I BE TIRED OF HIM NEVER SUPES SUCKS SORRY "

Hes my favorite Marvel character so i dont mind.

             YEP yeah to much Wolverine 
<------- Said the deadpool fan :P ahah

people ask writers and editors at Marvel all the time about Wolverine and Deadpool's over exposure....they always answer the same way to...if issues where the characters appear didn't always sell higher than the books normal figures then they would stop using them so much

Wolverine lacks the depth of the other Avengers? That's rich. Wolverine is one of the most dynamic and complex characters in comicdom bar none. While the majority of the main stream comic icons are pretty straight forward in their characterization, Wolverine's is a walking contradiction, which makes him unique. Logan is a man who by all rights should be a villain, but fights with every fiber of his being to be a better man. This division is what makes Wolverine so intriguing. The foundation of Wolverine's character his built upon several contrasting and opposing forces. Man vs Beast. Nature vs Nurture. Hero vs Villain. Samurai vs Berserker.  He is at once all of these things and none of them. He is not the Samurai or the Berserker, but the Samurai [b]and[/b] the Berserker at once. It's this dichotomy that makes Wolverine such a deep and interesting character, and unlike most character it is fundamental a part of Wolverine at all times. There is no Clark Kent, there is no Bruce Wayne, there is no Peter Parker. Wolverine and Logan are the same, and they struggle with the same demons. The fact that is as also be hinted at that Wolverine knows he can never achieve his goals, that he his merely postponing the inevitable and will one day end up just like Sabretooth makes his story even more poignant.  The only Avenger that even approachs the depth of Wolverine's character - that isn't a villain - is Tony Stark.
 
Anyway Wolverine appears in about as many books each month as Batman, and I don't hear anyone complaining about that. Am I supposed to believe that Batman is more deserving of his appearance numbers than Wolverine is? Because I don't think that is the case at all. Unlike Batman it at least makes sense for Wolverine to appear in so many books on a superficial level at the very least. He has a healing factor, with affords him superhuman stamina and the ability to go much longer without sleep. He doesn't have to put on the Bruce Wayne show every day. He also has a deeper and more diverse history that allows for him to appear and a wider variety of stories, spanning different genres and time periods.
 

" Wolverine lacks the depth of the other Avengers? That's rich. Wolverine is one of the most dynamic and complex characters in comicdom bar none. While the majority of the main stream comic icons are pretty straight forward in their characterization, Wolverine's is a walking contradiction, which makes him unique. Logan is a man who by all rights should be a villain, but fights with every fiber of his being to be a better man. This division is what makes Wolverine so intriguing. The foundation of Wolverine's character his built upon several contrasting and opposing forces. Man vs Beast. Nature vs Nurture. Hero vs Villain. Samurai vs Berserker.  He is at once all of these things and none of them. He is not the Samurai or the Berserker, but the Samurai [b]and[/b] the Berserker at once. It's this dichotomy that makes Wolverine such a deep and interesting character, and unlike most character it is fundamental a part of Wolverine at all times. There is no Clark Kent, there is no Bruce Wayne, there is no Peter Parker. Wolverine and Logan are the same, and they struggle with the same demons. The fact that is as also be hinted at that Wolverine knows he can never achieve his goals, that he his merely postponing the inevitable and will one day end up just like Sabretooth makes his story even more poignant.  The only Avenger that even approachs the depth of Wolverine's character - that isn't a villain - is Tony Stark.
 
Anyway Wolverine appears in about as many books each month as Batman, and I don't hear anyone complaining about that. Am I supposed to believe that Batman is more deserving of his appearance numbers than Wolverine is? Because I don't think that is the case at all. Unlike Batman it at least makes sense for Wolverine to appear in so many books on a superficial level at the very least. He has a healing factor, with affords him superhuman stamina and the ability to go much longer without sleep. He doesn't have to put on the Bruce Wayne show every day. He also has a deeper and more diverse history that allows for him to appear and a wider variety of stories, spanning different genres and time periods.
 
"

" @thegentlemanrogue said:

" Wolverine lacks the depth of the other Avengers? That's rich. Wolverine is one of the most dynamic and complex characters in comicdom bar none. While the majority of the main stream comic icons are pretty straight forward in their characterization, Wolverine's is a walking contradiction, which makes him unique. Logan is a man who by all rights should be a villain, but fights with every fiber of his being to be a better man. This division is what makes Wolverine so intriguing. The foundation of Wolverine's character his built upon several contrasting and opposing forces. Man vs Beast. Nature vs Nurture. Hero vs Villain. Samurai vs Berserker.  He is at once all of these things and none of them. He is not the Samurai or the Berserker, but the Samurai [b]and[/b] the Berserker at once. It's this dichotomy that makes Wolverine such a deep and interesting character, and unlike most character it is fundamental a part of Wolverine at all times. There is no Clark Kent, there is no Bruce Wayne, there is no Peter Parker. Wolverine and Logan are the same, and they struggle with the same demons. The fact that is as also be hinted at that Wolverine knows he can never achieve his goals, that he his merely postponing the inevitable and will one day end up just like Sabretooth makes his story even more poignant.  The only Avenger that even approachs the depth of Wolverine's character - that isn't a villain - is Tony Stark.
 
Anyway Wolverine appears in about as many books each month as Batman, and I don't hear anyone complaining about that. Am I supposed to believe that Batman is more deserving of his appearance numbers than Wolverine is? Because I don't think that is the case at all. Unlike Batman it at least makes sense for Wolverine to appear in so many books on a superficial level at the very least. He has a healing factor, with affords him superhuman stamina and the ability to go much longer without sleep. He doesn't have to put on the Bruce Wayne show every day. He also has a deeper and more diverse history that allows for him to appear and a wider variety of stories, spanning different genres and time periods.
 
"

Yes, you are supposed to believe that, because it's the truth. Wolverine is not an in depth character, he is a series of layered clichés. By giving him no memory, Marvel allowed themselves the opportunity to add whatever character traits they felt like. For example; Wolverine is a psychotic killer. No, he's a father figure. No, he's a samurai. No, wait, he's an Avenger. No, wait, he likes killing. Hang on, no he doesn't. He can't remember his past, wait yes he can.  It's insanity. He's a bland smash and grab type who has been given every advantage a comic character could have been given.  This is my opinion.  I understand that you must like Wolverine, and I appreciate the statement you have presented, but I cannot possibly agree with it. I really hope we don't get into a massive argument over this, I''m just asserting that I am currently your antithesis. "

I do like Wolverine, but I don't like him being overused. (The same goes for Deadpool)

Nope i like Wolverine ))

Never been sick of Wolvie for as long as he's drawn well. He's the best!

I love Wolverine.

I´m not sick of him. I think he is a cool character so it´s great to see him in the books.

 i was JK about the other post i love supes but i WILL NEVER GET TIRED OF WOLVERINE NEVER

I soooo sick of Wolverine it isn't even funny. I hate him in Avengers and every X issue he appears in. Most of all I hate Daken and X-23 and all of his Wolverine wannabe buddies.

" its like with a popular song when you first hear it you like it then it starts getting played more and more often then you think ok this could get old the next thing you youre thinking the next time i hear that f**kin song im gonna freak out then like a year later all the people who said how great it was are on vh1 telling people how dumb they were for liking it in the first place i just dont want wolvie to end up like chumba wumba(i understand if noone remembers that band) "

Don't care either way.

" Hang on a moment -  Sick of our good friend Wolverine? Is this some kind of tastless joke?  But seriously, how come you all dislike him? He's great! "

Well since I only see him in New Avengers, Uncanny X-Men, and Wolverine: Weapon X (the only books I read with him in them) it really doesn't bother me, so I would say no.

I don't like him that much cuz I think he's overrated. It's not because he's so UTTERLY TERRIBLE or cuz he exists in 1000 places at once. These make him annoying but I think most people who are sick of him, are sick because every time he shows up somewhere (which is..everywhere) he tends to dominate the pages. People have favourite characters other than wolverine and once he is in an issue he absolutely HAS to be the star. marvel makes him the alleged best h2h fighter and a mutant and an avenger in addition to 100 years of fighting practice which basically makes the other characters in the book irrelevant.
 
I think cyclops is cool but he never gets a fair chance cuz of wolverine. I was terrified when he became an avenger because he would then put characters such as cap and spidey and thor etc on the sidelines. If he wasn't as FORCIBLY important as he is I'm sure the few people that don't like him,might.

No :-)

" I don't like him that much cuz I think he's overrated. It's not because he's so UTTERLY TERRIBLE or cuz he exists in 1000 places at once. These make him annoying but I think most people who are sick of him, are sick because every time he shows up somewhere (which is..everywhere) he tends to dominate the pages. People have favourite characters other than wolverine and once he is in an issue he absolutely HAS to be the star. marvel makes him the alleged best h2h fighter and a mutant and an avenger in addition to 100 years of fighting practice which basically makes the other characters in the book irrelevant.  I think cyclops is cool but he never gets a fair chance cuz of wolverine. I was terrified when he became an avenger because he would then put characters such as cap and spidey and thor etc on the sidelines. If he wasn't as FORCIBLY important as he is I'm sure the few people that don't like him,might. "

No way. Wolverine is the coolest. 

He's in so many books for a reason.  He's that popular for a reason.  As far as h2h fighters go he has one of the absolute best powersets.  Of coarse Marvel is going to put him in as many things as they can, because he makes money and Marvel is first and foremost a business. Don't like it just ignore it., they do this kind of thing with all the popular characters.

Yes, wolverine is way overused.   Wolverine is my favorite character of all time.  I've been collecting and reading x-men and wolverine books since I was 10 yrs old.  Back in the early '80's.  I always wanted more wolverine.  Mostly because he was only in x-men comics not on solo adventures.  I always dreamed of having all these books every month with wolverine in all of them.  Now that he is in every comic from spider-man, deadpool, psylocke, new avengers, x-men, x-force, weapon x, origins, red hulk, green hulk, and so on.   It is a little disturbing.  I just collect the story lines I want to follow and ignore the rest.  I guess too much is better than just a side story in uncanny x-men.

There something fishy going on at Marvel...
 
Fist they overuse Wolverine like crazy 
Second they give Deadpool 4 running series at the same time
Third they start to use Daken more and more.... (well maybe)
 
Well someone that get cut/shot/decapited/gutted/etc every two issu is fun for a while but it get old pretty fast, I just hope the Deapool craze will cool down soon so with less immortal killers people will probly be less annoyed by the overuse of Wolvie