I feel people simultaneously oversimplify this and overcomplicate it all the same. Characters abilities are dictated creatively, not bound by definitions used in their creation, when a character has a trait thats popular, that trait gets emphasized more and more, and might even become a selling point for the character. Progressive writers may even take to creatively enhanced or ignoring what they think, works, and doesn't work.
Hulk originally was written to be, weaker than Thor, not weaker as in power, weaker as in strength. You'll find lots of people that might say otherwise, but Stan Lee has been quoted on this many times. Hulk could amp, so he could in strength catch up and even out around Thor's strength level. Of course like any good writer, Stan Lee was also quick to point out thats how he viewed the characters. He created the characters, still, he knows people and importantly writers have different ideas. Hulk of course got a lot more popular and big than Thor. Not just that, but his strength is one of the parts that sells Hulk, in fact if Marvel announced tomorrow, Hulk, is, and has only ever been its 10th strongest character, and everything officially Marvel, reflected that, then... well, Hulk's not the only person in the world thats going to be pissed off. Most peoples total lack of understanding and what infinity is, and just the fact that strength is his selling point and the fact that his catchphrases involve saying he is the strongest, all pretty much contribute to why many consider and view Hulk as stronger. Then you have writers that legitimately believe he is stronger. Some think Thor is, some think Sentry was, something Hulk is stronger than Superman, some don't. Its a tangled, drunken web of lies and confusion (its not really)
You won't see Marvel make a hard declaration on this anyway, since why do that and lose money from readers, when they can be ambiguous and let those who give them money and think one thing, stand beside another fan giving them money who thinks the opposite. Thor has no known limit to his strength (in one context, and that would be the official Marvel line on the matter, context), and Hulk has some types of limits (like anger limits, what infinity is used, is reality warping involved, it would need to be, and the context here is logic, and because the narrative hasn't answered more than obvious problems that would arise, nor addressed the fact that its also touted other characters as having no limit, and the other obvious fact that in many technical ways humans don't really either, as in we hit a limit, then we can think of a solution in the same vein as a writer, since we won't actually have to apply the theory, as in Hulk we never actually have infinite strength), it just depends on the context, and for some reason people tend to forget that. Also Marvel's definition of god is different to how people project it often.
Its a great point you make about definitions. Remember characters like Molecule Man are from man made science accidents as well, and he has power that dwarfs Galactus. Plus THor isn't powerful because he is a god,he is powerful because Stan Lee designed him to effectively be the most powerful superhero, and his logic as to why, was by making Thor a god, which sort of sounds like the same thing, but as it applies to the story, well its different. Plus conception and execution has a funny way of changing things up.
Log in to comment