x35's The Superior Foes of Spider-Man #1 review

  • Score:
  • x35 wrote this review on .
  • 7 out of 7 Comic Vine users found it helpful.
  • x35 has written a total of 163 reviews. The last one was for TPB

Law of odds alone says one of these days, it's gotta happen, right?

AF Reviews: Thunderbolts

I had high hopes for this. I was hoping it could be an actual Marvel NOW book that I enjoyed. With Thunderbolts utterly ruined, I saw in this the possibility for a replacement. I mean, there's 3 former Thunderbolts right there on the cover (Boomerang, Shocker and Speed Demon) and one pseudo-T-Bolt (Beetle). Hell, Boomerang and Shocker are even still wearing their T-Bolt belt buckles on the cover. I legitimately was hoping to like this. Spoilers: I didn't.

The book takes an approach to the villains that is light-hearted and pokes fun at them. I'm fine with this general idea, it's been done great in other books, but the problem here is it's not. It's just the same old stuff. "Let's laugh at these losers for being losers". That's all that's really going on here. You can read the preview and as much as have read the book because it is through-and-through just a series of thematically identical sketches thinly linked by a few set-ups of a plot for the next few issues.

I think running down the plot more or less exemplifies why this book didn't work for me: we begin with Boomerang in jail talking to Shocker and Speed Demon. There's not-so-snappy decompressed Bendis-style talk galore and awkward attempts at trying to write people like "real" people. Then Shocker and Speed Demon go to feed Boomerang's birds but rob a pet store and steal a puppy from a little girl while swearing non-stop while elsewhere Beetle and Overdrive rob a comic book store (OH ALL THE META HUMORS). Amidst complaining about everything and swearing, Shocker and Speed Demon find Boomerang actually had them steal diamonds. But the diamonds are fake and Hammerhead's not really there and all this annoying banter is mixed in with a few random bits with the Chameleon setting up a plot, that's about it.

It's just annoying, really. The characters all have the same pathetic voice that I'm sure others will say is "so realistic" and "the greatest down-to-Earth portrayal of the a villain ever" but it's really really not. It's just frustrating in it's repetitive tone. Maybe Speed Demon is lame, maybe Shocker is pathetic, whatever. If that's all you can be bothered to establish in an issue, then don't bother writing them and pretending it's character building. Making them have petty little banters and generally appear incompetent and lame is fun for about 3 pages. A whole book about it is just insulting and boring.

Also the amount of censored swear-words (and in one case not censored at all) is just insane. It seems like it's not just the decompressed banter inspired by Bendis, but we have the ol' Bendis method of instead of writing reactions or dialogue, just offering us "%^&*$^&%" every now and again. It's just tiresome. So tiresome.

The only real good points of this issue are that I wasn't forced to endure a guest spot form the Inferior Spider-Man and that's about it. Boomerang taking the lead I suppose I liked but I'm sure these is just an excuse to build to more sketches about how lame and pathetic he is. Also, it's nice to see they decided to just ignore anything done with Boomerang in Thunderbolts except for the costume. What little characterisation there is, it's nothing unique. At all. A villain being self-aware isn't anything to write home about. I wanted to like this book, I really did, it's just too annoying at it's insistence of "pathetic".

5 Comments
Edited by akbogert

I'm not familiar with most of these characters, but it's a shame to hear they're getting a spotlight only to undermine them. Or at least, it's a shame that that's how it's coming across.

Question: someone tagged Silver Sable as being in this issue. Is that a brief flashback, or what?

Edited by X35

@akbogert said:

I'm not familiar with most of these characters, but it's a shame to hear they're getting a spotlight only to undermine them. Or at least, it's a shame that that's how it's coming across.

Question: someone tagged Silver Sable as being in this issue. Is that a brief flashback, or what?

Just a one-panel flashback to when Boomerang, Shocker and Speed Demon were in the Sinister Syndicate and fought Spider-Man and Silver Sable in The Amazing Spider-Man #280-281.

Posted by akbogert

@x35: Alrighty. Thanks :)

Posted by Avenging-X-Bolt

needs more fury and hateful disgust....

Posted by Night Thrasher

I actually found this issue quite compelling. The focus was on Boomerang which was okay because I guess he's supposed to be the leader. Shocker and Speed Demon also got some good bits of characterization but Beetle and Overdrive were really hanger-ons in the first issue. Overall though, this wasn't a bad introduction to the "team". If I were rating it I would say a solid 3.5-4.5 stars.

Other reviews for The Superior Foes of Spider-Man #1

    The [?]-Ferior Foes 0

    The whole idea of Superior Spider-Month feels so blatantly gimmicky, to try to jump start more Spidey spin-offs while the controversy of Superior Spider-Man is riding high. I mean, Superior Carnage? And Superior Spider-Man Team-Up is just a continuation of Avenging Spider-Man. And The Superior Foes of Spider-Man? That title is a mouthful on it's own, and.... What's that? Nick Spencer's writing this? Oh nevermind I'm way on board.And Spencer continues to not disappoint me. The premise is direct ...

    4 out of 4 found this review helpful.

This edit will also create new pages on Comic Vine for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Comic Vine users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.