@z3ro180 No sorry my firend Matt idelson ( editor of superman ) already said in a interview that he is now more vulnerable than he was in the past i know im pissed off about it 2 but i may be wrong becase matt may have been refering to the silver age superman compared the new 52 superman but heres a link you can pass judgement your self http://www.supermanhomepage.com/inter-action/inter-action.php?topic=ask-editor/ask-matt and heres the q and a Collin asks: Is Superman more or less invulnerable than his armor-looking suit? His uniform has traditionally been invincible, but whenever something can actually pierce it, the Man of Steel is relatively unharmed, if a bit worse for the wear. Now he has something that looks like armor. If something is strong enough to get through it, does that mean it's strong enough to hurt him, or will he laugh it off like in days of old? Matt: Well, Supes is certainly more vulnerable than he was in the days of old, Collin. He can be hurt, as we've seen, though he can still heal as well. Lets just say from a general standpoint that if something can pierce his suit, it can probably pierce his skin as well. Really, the reason Supes first put on the suit was revealed in ACTION #8, but the fact that it is Kryptonian in origin (and therefore part of a heritage he wants to understand) and certainly more durable than his T-shirt and jeans look gives him incentive to keep wearing it.
Log in to comment