Obviously the movie has been out for a while now and everyone has their opinions. This isn't intended to persuade anyone.
I just thought I would take some caps from the movie of scenes where I thought there were issues, and explain why.
Character » Superman appears in 18941 issues.
Obviously the movie has been out for a while now and everyone has their opinions. This isn't intended to persuade anyone.
I just thought I would take some caps from the movie of scenes where I thought there were issues, and explain why.
I have a bigger problem with Nolan Batman than Nolan Superman. Nolan Batman isn't Batman at all in my book. He isn't overtly intelligent, knwoeldgable, has no detective aspect to the character and isn't that great at martiala rts...possibly because of his ridiculous costume prohibiting his movement.
As for NolanSuperman...The problem is that this incarnation of the character had little in common with every other incarnation.
I'm talking serials, Bruce Timm Animated series, Fleischer cartoons, Lois and Clark, Smallville, Donner movies, Singers movie, the comics, silverage, pre crisis, post crisis, new52 etc.
In *every* other incarnation, the character cared about people before himself, before stopping the bad guy. Saving lives and making sure people were not hurt was his biggest priority.
That aspect of the character was absent from movie. I'm not talking about him killing Zod, which isn't what I have a problem with, but the needless destruction he helped facilitate.
Ramming Zod through various stores full of people, throwing Zod through buildings, prolonging the fight...a perfect example is when Zod throws a truck at him and he flies over it letting it crash into the people behind him. Superman would have caught it and placed it down....
I don't think it's being nitpicky. Everytime I watch that movie I see consistently a character who wants to stop the bad guy, not to save people as his priority. Which is what Snyder and Goyer are going for...that's their concept of Superman.
Superman is meant to be inspiring. That isn't something said lightly...it's THE most important aspect of the character. When you have a broody superman dressed in a moody blue that isn't trying to be the best he can be, isn't valuing life above all else...then you've lost sight of the character.
It's a shame too, because the movie seemed like it was going in the right direction with all the talk about Superman showing us the way....
Running the through by numbers:
Guess what? All film is subjective. Period. Your opinion on any movie is no more valid that anyone else's or any movie.
And considering half these images are explained if you just watch the movie, its not even a very good hate thread.
Sorry if this is some kind of revelation for you.
@fallschirmjager: you gunna cry too?
Not to say this movie is without genuine problems like pacing with flashbacks, but a good chunk of these pictures were nitpicks.
@muyjingo: You need to watch the movie again, because half of your images explain themselves if you pay attention
over all this hate thread gets 1/10, most of your so called problems answer themselves if you pay attention to the movie. Overall you lack perspectiv and understand on so many levels.
@outside_85: OK, Lets run through the numbers.
I don't lack perspective, many of the things if explained are not justified. Overall your reply gets 1/10, as you lack perspective and simply rationalize away the problems.
You obviously didn't watch the Man of Steel live fan event that took place a couple of hours ago did you? Its probably up somewhere to view, go watch that.
My two cents- Looking at this as a die hard comic book fan, aspects of the movie are hard to like. Seeing it as a huge Invasion sci-fi story with this man with powers in the thick of it trying to stop armageddon, Its a good movie.
P.S- Just skimmed through the OP before so after really reading it...ya your complaints aren't even valid if you just watched the film properly.
@fallschirmjager: No, they are not explained, and if they are it doesn't justify them.
Secondly, film can be evaluated objectively. It's why a well reasoned and thought out critique of a film is generally worth more than some schmoe saying he didn't like it.
I also think it's a bit strong to call this a hate thread. I didn't hate the movie, I just found it disappointing considering what it could have been.
@muyjingo: lol.
That fact that you said that only proves you know nothing about film.
Film is art. It cannot be measured in any way.
Film critics don't measure a film, they just give their opinions on.
There is nothing to measure. Nothing to quantify.
Their opinions are no more valid that anyone's.
@fallschirmjager: @fallschirmjager: art doesn't have to be some quantifiable number like math to be able to make well reasoned decisions on. We can look at filmmaking from objective stances. In a sense it is measuring.
Maybe you can't differentiate between the level of artistry between the Mona Lisa and one of your old finger paintings, but some people can. Same can be said for films.
@extremis: Measure it for me then.
I'll wait.
Bottom line: You can't tell people what will or won't entertain them. I think parody movies like "Vampires Suck" are stupid. I know people who think they are funny. Doesn't mean I'm wrong and their right, because there is no way to measure it.
Oh my God I am so sick of these "why Man of Steel was bad" threads that I just had to come in here and complain just to get that +1 comment.
@muyjingo: lol.
That fact that you said that only proves you know nothing about film.
Film is art. It cannot be measured in any way.
Film critics don't measure a film, they just give their opinions on.
There is nothing to measure. Nothing to quantify.
Their opinions are no more valid that anyone's.
Actually, you're just showing your ignorance. I know quite a lot about film.
Just because something is art, does not mean it can not be evaluated objectively.
It only means it is harder, and the objective evaluation is not as meaningful in other fields.
Lighting, direction, cinematography, casting, set design, costume design, number of acts and progression, script... these are just some of the things that can be evaluated and compared objectively.
Saying art transcends objective criticism because it's "art" is a tired, useless and flawed argument. It's generally something crappy artists cling to.
@fallschirmjager: it's not math. I can't just simply provide a number. But you can use reason, be learned about the craft and make objective observations based on that knowledge. Do you really need me to explain how a person uses proper reasoning? How old are you yo?
Some of these reasons I understand (Pa Kent's death scene was pretty dumb), and some of these are pretty ridiculous (why was the codex shaped like a skull? Why does it matter?). Just so you know though Zack Snyder actually did state the reason why (though not in the film where, once again, it didn't actually matter.). It actually is a skull, taken from the oldest Kryptonian ever discovered, from which they extract original Kryptonian DNA in its purest form, ie. before mutations could occur (I presume).
@muyjingo: No, they can't. Because what 1 person sees isn't the same as what another person sees.
You cannot tell someone what, how and if they will or won't like something.
All critics do is given their opinions. Nothing more.
Moreover, none of your points complained about the so called objectives of a film that can be measured. In fact you even go out of your way to say they are your opinions, because they in fact are.
I can't tell you what movie entertains you or doesn't. I can't tell you what sounds good to your ears when you listen to a song. I can't tell you what makes you laugh or doesn't.
Entertainment is subjective.
@fallschirmjager: I've talked with you before and you always seem to misunderstand subjective experience with objective reasoning.
@fallschirmjager: it's not math. I can't just simply provide a number. But you can use reason, be learned about the craft and make objective observations based on that knowledge. Do you really need me to explain how a person uses proper reasoning? How old are you yo?
@extremis said:
@fallschirmjager: I've talked with you before and you always seem to misunderstand subjective experience with objective reasoning.
I'm confused? lol.
You are trying to argue that someone liking something or not liking something can be measured or quantified.
You can't measure how funny a joke is or how good a song sounds, or how entertained someone is when they watch a movie.
Just because a critic knows more about film that you, doesn't mean you aren't allowed to like it if they don't.
Moreover, for all the so-called things you can apparently quantify, I haven't seen 1 person complaining about something that is objective. Everything people cry about is opinionated.
"I didn't like Superman killing' - opinion
"I didn't like Superman ignoring collateral damage" - opinion.
and so on and so forth
And that is the bottom line.
@fallschirmjager: well you obviously are confused because no one is saying a person can tell you not to like something.
An you keep bringing up "measuring". Stop that. No one is measuring anything in a literal sense.
@allstarsuperman: so let's end the thread because you've spoken? Nice try man :p
@extremis: This whole thing started with your claim "MoS is overrated"
And I told you, you can't say how much someone likes or doesn't like a film, because its all opinionated. MoS isn't overrated, no film is. You can like it, you can not like it. That's it.
So, yeah. Not confused.
@fallschirmjager: so A person can only like or not like a film and say nothing more about it because you say so? You're a moron, I'm sorry but you are seriously a ridiculous hypocrite. You're saying it's all opinion based then insist my opinion is wrong because you say so.
You are indeed a very confused individual.
And this didn't start with my opinion, it started with you replying To me with nonsense because you don't like that some people knowledgeable about film say MoS sucksx
This movie is really something. It has people that don't like Superman talking about it.
You do realize they needed to take out the one in the Indian Ocean to stop the one in Metropolis....I think Jax-Ux told Zod that. I think Snyder said 5000 people died in the movie. A resolution would have been nice yeah....but whatever. Stop beating a dead horse.
@extremis: LOLOLOLOLOL
Where did I say your opinion is wrong?
If you don't like the movie fine, but that doesn't mean you're right and people who like it are wrong. That is what I've been saying this whole time.
@fallschirmjager: You're wrong, and seem to have ignored my previous post.
Let me put it this way. Gone with the Wind, Citizen Cane and Casablanca are all objectively better films than Wild Hogs, Disaster Movie and Terminator 4.
Regardless if you or I disagree, our subjective opinions are irrelevant.
As for the thread, they are my opinions. All of the problems I have are dismissed with the claim that it's a new take on Superman, as that is what is used to excuse all the differences. To me though, subjectively, the differences are sufficient to distort the character.
@fallschirmjager: the movie is overrated. Deal you fanboy scum
I really dislike the Pa Kent death scene and the Flashback pacing, and the shaky cam. There is another way? Not in this movie. The other way sucked Faora and the other kryptonian.
The only time I thought the camera work was distracting was when Lois was running in the alley. Aside from that, never bothered me at all.
Some of these reasons I understand (Pa Kent's death scene was pretty dumb), and some of these are pretty ridiculous (why was the codex shaped like a skull? Why does it matter?). Just so you know though Zack Snyder actually did state the reason why (though not in the film where, once again, it didn't actually matter.). It actually is a skull, taken from the oldest Kryptonian ever discovered, from which they extract original Kryptonian DNA in its purest form, ie. before mutations could occur (I presume).
Then that's a good reason. The film would have been better for it if they had noted that somehow.
"I didn't like Superman ignoring collateral damage" - opinion.
and so on and so forth
And that is the bottom line.
That's because of the phrasing you chose.
"Superman killing is out of character"
"There were alternatives to killing Zod"
"Superman causing and not caring about collateral damage is out of character"
These are objective claims that can be evaluated and investigated by looking to the source material....all 75 years of it.
Of course, people then disagree over whether or not it matters using the "new take" excuse...so nothing is really accomplished and in the end, even after objective evaluation, conclusions will be subjective.
@fallschirmjager: the movie is overrated. Deal you fanboy scum
lol. and at last his true self emerges. Whatever. I'm done with you. Enjoy your high horse.
@fallschirmjager: You're wrong, and seem to have ignored my previous post.
Let me put it this way. Gone with the Wind, Citizen Cane and Casablanca are all objectively better films than Wild Hogs, Disaster Movie and Terminator 4.
Regardless if you or I disagree, our subjective opinions are irrelevant.
As for the thread, they are my opinions. All of the problems I have are dismissed with the claim that it's a new take on Superman, as that is what is used to excuse all the differences. To me though, subjectively, the differences are sufficient to distort the character.
How are they objectively better? You can't tell me what I enjoy no more than I can tell you what you enjoy. Or anyone else. There is no way to quantify enjoyment and that is what films are made for: enjoyment.
Not all of your points. Several of them were incorrect, such as the scenes you missed with the scout ship. You claimed it never showed up again, when it did in fact several times.
When you had an opinion such as: I don't like the suit. I address it as such. Its your opinion, its fine. In fact I sort of agree with you in that it was a tad dark and needed a red belt.
Please Log In to post.
This edit will also create new pages on Comic Vine for:
Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Comic Vine users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.
Log in to comment