even the most devout Superman fan must admit that Superman has a vulnerability to magic , yet from reading many discussions on here there seems to be a lack of consensus.

" even the most devout Superman fan must admit that Superman has a vulnerability to magic , yet from reading many discussions on here there seems to be a lack of consensus. "

I was under the understanding that the mainstream comic book version of Superman was as vulnerable to magic as a regular person, but the animated version of him is resistant to magic, but enough of it will injure him.

I honestly don't know. Sometimes he's written as being vulnerable, sometimes he's not. The problem is that the writers don't know if he is or not.

" I honestly don't know. Sometimes he's written as being vulnerable, sometimes he's not. The problem is that the writers don't know if he is or not. "

" @JediXMan said:

" I honestly don't know. Sometimes he's written as being vulnerable, sometimes he's not. The problem is that the writers don't know if he is or not. "

No wonder people on here argue all the time. "

" @JediXMan: That was my understanding.  I think it makes more sense if he's vulnerable to magic, although Superman-Prime is the most interesting new villain I've seen in a while. "

The other issue i've noticed is how much it hurts him. Some treat him as if Magic cuts through his invulnerability like a knife through butter, and other's more like a plastic knife through steak.  I wish we knew exactly how affective it is on him, it would cut arguments down trememdously. I mean take the Thor fight. He was able to power through it b/c he's still invulnerable, it just had more of an effect b/c it was Magical Lightning, same w/ Cap Marvel. 

Yes, I wish writers would get their crap together and be more consistent.

It'd b nice.

magic can pass his bio field so he's as vulnrable to it as a normal human but he has some resistance to it otherwise hed die with 1 shazam, also does he still have the magic shield aura or is that gone now?