@amazingangel: No. No more Batman. No more Bruce Wayne. Just Superman. Only Superman. That's it. No more Batman movies.

@nerx: I know one you can shoot.

@limpoyzloan: ALL BATMAN!

@amazingangel: No point in gunning a dead monkey

Man Of Steel is so damn good shows Rotten Tomateos real face, showing how useless selfcentered obnoxious arrogant and mentally challenged those guys are.

Rotten Tomatoes brainwashes people, see how reviews everywhere just repeats what they say and people belive what they say is the truth.

I just hope this evidence Rotten Tomatoes is going to die and we will never see them again.

Seriously, Return got higger reviews, a movie that show Bryan Singer was living in the past and dont understand today society and see a senlessles society thatt is not real and is not there anymore.

Not seriously, see the critics, is because they dont see Christopher Reeve's Superman, they say is a bad movie, how childish and stuck in the past you must be to keep wanting this.

The whole they changed that means it sucks now thing, is very normal thing ask Nolan for all the hate he gets for Batman.

Rotten Tomatoes overrates and underrates movies, everything is black and white for those guys.

They are biased to some genres, studios, actors and directors.

They make The Avenger looks like if it was The Citizen Kane of the 21 Century, based on what hype and a market campaign, yeah they have no real opinions or no real arguments with this movie.

They state their opinions of a movie as absolute fact, if you dont belive the same you are an imbecile fool in their eyes, their opinions is the only one, this is how dellusional those arrogant pricks are.

This guys dont understand the Snakes on The Plane Theory, about knowing what market is going and what is the job the movie has to do, they are horribly biased to "author" movies, but horrribly hypocritical abouu what that means, they like artistic movies that have nothing of art and are just arrogant pretentious movies and hate the ones are honest movies.

They even fail to judge movies by their budget, if a movie cost 1 million buck and gets the same result one that cost 90 millions, it shows how bad the 90 millions buck movie is.

The Internet Movie Database 99.99% of users sucks, but there is a 0.1% that understands this theory and know how actually review a movie unbiased and in a neautral way to see thing.

They belive unnecessarily complicated difficult to understand = Author film and Artistic film,even whn actually is a poorly executed film for an arrogant guys like them.

They are the reason why people belvie critics are nothing more that failed filmakers, that hate movies because they failed and they have to give their hates to people that actually makes movie and never failed in their dream.

I could be a useless selfcentered obnoxious arrogant guy most of the time, i can belive people is stupid for watching movies like Resident Evil, but that dont change i understand the Snakes on The Plane Theory, i understand it goes for a market and is made to work in some way, judge movies based on this and their budgets, i know what movies have failed at doing their job and what movies dont and i dont belive movies like the Hurt Locker are great just for the fact are made so people win awards, i actually belive that is killing the movie industry and is a cancer that it should be destroy.

I like all type of movies, dont matter the budget or the genre i love movies, thing that Rotten Tomatoes dont, so the only thing i have to say to Rotten Tomatoes is EAT SHIT!!!!

Also The Hurt Locker Sucks was the only movie Nominated Worst that Avatar.

it has made a lot for WB and DC

It may have mostly mixed/negative reviews from critics and has divided comic fans on forums (even then I see far more positive than negative), but it brought in a lot of cash and the general audience definitely seems to like it:

• 82% from users on Rotten Tomatoes
• Poll on CBR was widely positive (75% gave a B or above)
• 8.4 user score on metacritic
• 8.2 on IMDB.

@k4tzm4n: I read as well that it already made its budget back in domestic alone.

There are many reasons why I do not like this movie. I did not like the characters; they were very bland. There was no purpose for half of them. Flashbacks can be out of order, but I did not like how this movie handled them specifically. I did not get a good feel of character development. I'm feeling rather blah about everything but the action(I actually support the special effects, how else could you do it?), and one extra aspect that I like about it. I like the concept that his powers are like a schizophrenia for him until he learns to control them. Blah blah blah. I could go on

@amazingangel: lol

Lol at me thinking a 72% (at the time), was a flop. Has dropped to a 56% since then. Truly shows how high the hype was for this movie. Honestly thought it could be the greatest cbm ever. I don't agree with RT all the time, but I do on this occasion.

@novi_homines: I gotta ask, did you see it for a second time? It flows better in the second viewing.

I don't see how critics not liking it should be attributed to the hype instead of their personal gripes. Having some expectations are understandable, but letting strong ones dictate your review seems like a flawed approach to me. What I mean by that is if a critic goes in expecting it to be the best CBM and hates it because it's not, then, in my opinion, they're not doing their job right. But hey, to each their own, I suppose.

this movie is already the best non Nolan DC movie ever, I'd say that's not a flop. I would say I liked it better than Iron Man 3 but not as much as The Avengers

Flopping only means it failed at the box office. Which, as far as I have seen it didn't. It has been reviewed poorly though. Not like I care about what critics think.

I applaud you sir, couldn't of said it better myself.

I've seen it twice. Wasn't better.

I meant how high my own hype was for the movie. Should've clarified.

Well...If anything the movie is not a flop and looks like its on its way to a billion. Hopefully the second one will be better.