@jsh92 said:
In the world of comic books, is there really a difference between the two? lol
I agree. This is where you (jsh92) can stop reading. It's gonna get LONG
I was actually going to create a thread just like this but on comic relationships in general. How can you tell when it's genuine or a plot device? But in fiction, isn't everything a plot device? This relationship is meant to move the plot forward, isn't it? So isn't everything that happens in fiction by definition, a plot device? First, we must decide on what a real relationship is. Interactions between two people, be it good, bad, platonic, sexual etc. In this case, romantic. Is that agreeable? Has there been any interaction.... NO.... Okay, there has been but it's minimal. That's not a relationship; that's a kiss (Superman! The Rebound Guy!), a dinner out and likely super sex (could really be just a one night stand the way things are going). Oh and I forgot to mention - VIOLATING INTERNATIONAL LAW! They're adults; a journalist and a princess (hopefully, still a politician) to be exact. Both should have knowledge of this kind of thing. I blame the writing not the characters. Sheesh, they just come off as ridiculous sometimes
Well then, does the length of the relationship qualify it as a "plot device"? This looks like it may not last the year. I recall people naming Luke Cage's relationship and then marriage to Jessica Jones a plot device. Even their baby was branded as such. They're still together as far as I know, so are they still a plot device? If you say yes, doesn't that mean that any relationship, I mean ANY in fiction, or at least comics is a plot device? Bruce and Selina? Lois and Clark? MJ and Peter? Wolverine and the female population of the Marvel Universe? (Or maybe only romantic/sexual relationships are plot devices....??). Do genuine relationships have to do with character development?
END/LITERARY CRITICISM (....and copious amounts of rhetorical questions)
Now, for my opinion. I say this SM/WW relationship fiasco was a publicity stunt (which no one except comic nerds like us cared about) and plot device from the beginning. There's an entire universe of characters that either could have been sensibly paired with but DC decided to do this. Did it really have to be Superman and Wonder Woman? As the OP said, there were glimmers of someone writing an actual love (that's such an overused word. Let's say "really strong attraction") story here and there but they were minuscule and ultimately overshadowed by the threat of Trinity War which was why this happened anyway. I can feel the circles growing larger by the minute
At first I wanted to like it (thank you JL8), then could stomach the idea. But now, I'm sure almost no effort or thought was put into the build up or actual writing and the characterization of the participants is just.... *swears loudly into pillow*. It adds nothing to either. I'd almost go as far as saying it detracts from them. She's not some socially inept enabler and he's not some stupid, four eyed meat-head. AND BATMAN IS NEITHER'S DADDY! Does anyone really have an excuse for screwing up a relationship between 2 of comics' most iconic characters. You said it right @mpfly88. A 110% SHOULD have been put into this. I'd be shocked if they stayed together after Trinity War (but at least that heralds the end of such a badly written pair and even maybe, prayerfully this run of JL. AMEN). So much for superstar writing
Log in to comment