superboy- not technically a clone

#1 Posted by joshmightbe (19517 posts) - 2 years, 5 months ago - Show Bio

A clone is defined as an identical genetic copy but superboy has only partial dna of superman and Lex so technically he's more of a test tube baby its the same situation with x-23

#2 Posted by Primmaster64 (21136 posts) - 2 years, 5 months ago - Show Bio

he's they'r kid

#3 Posted by joshmightbe (19517 posts) - 2 years, 5 months ago - Show Bio

@Primmaster64: technically yea,btw I'm sure gay couples would love this kind of technology

#4 Posted by Primmaster64 (21136 posts) - 2 years, 5 months ago - Show Bio

@joshmightbe: You made me lol

#5 Posted by Valtot (4502 posts) - 2 years, 4 months ago - Show Bio

ye this was dealt with in the comics hes the son of lex luther and clark kent. since both his parents are men does that make him a "super" boy

#6 Posted by Z3RO180 (3815 posts) - 2 years, 4 months ago - Show Bio

i know superboys a clone but isnt he technicly super mans son in some sense as well as lex luthers son

#7 Posted by John Valentine (15780 posts) - 2 years, 4 months ago - Show Bio

Well done. Would you like a medal?

#8 Posted by Valtot (4502 posts) - 2 years, 4 months ago - Show Bio

thank god he got clarks looks and not hairless luthers

#9 Posted by Z3RO180 (3815 posts) - 2 years, 4 months ago - Show Bio

serisoly if u think about it hes super man jr

#10 Posted by Mercy_ (83749 posts) - 2 years, 4 months ago - Show Bio

Not really...

Moderator

#11 Posted by PowerHerc (50957 posts) - 2 years, 4 months ago - Show Bio

@joshmightbe said:

" @Primmaster64: technically yea,btw I'm sure gay couples would love this kind of technology "

Yes, I suppose they would.

Superboy

Kon-El/Connor Kent was cloned from the Kryptonian DNA of Superman, the Human DNA of Lex Luthor, and a third unknown source to be the ultimate living weapon.

Comment and Save