@V_Scarlotte_Rose said:
@butterflykyss said:
@V_Scarlotte_Rose said:
And why has she never had an ongoing? Maybe Marvel don't think she's popular enough to have one.
That argument isn't relevant, as we're comparing Storm and Ms. Marvel, not who is the most popular Avenger.
It has nothing to do with her popularity because she clearly is popular. She's been featured on virtually every game, cartoon, and movie associated with the Xmen. The reason that storm does not have her own on-going, yet Ms. Marvel who is less popular than her, with her previous and current on-going having mediocre sales is because Storm is female and because she is black. Female characters have shown to not generate revenue for Marvel when given a solo, and Black males have shown to not generate revenue. Storm happens to be both female and black. If marvel pushed her, gave her interesting story, good writer, great artist and it flopped then you could compare Storm to Ms. marvel in the regards of on-goings. However, she hasn't had an on-going so basing MS. marvel to Storm on her mini-series, which many fans didn't like in the first place is not a fair comparison.
You all keep repeating yourself. She's in virtually every game, cartoon, and film associated with the X-Men,because she's a popular X-Men character, not because she's a popular character generally.
It's not like she's just any other character though. If she's really so popular and well known, surely she must have enough fans who would buy her series. If people avoid black female characters, but Storm is apparently more popular than Ms. Marvel despite this, then she would still have more fans who would buy it.
And if you don't want to compare them, then there's really nothing we can compare as far as I know. The only fair way to compare the two is to compare their solo popularity at roughly the same time. Can you think of another way of doing this?
1.) So based on this logic, every character that is featured on the xmen team would be equally popular, correct? Its not the individual character that a reader connects with but it is the fact that the character is on a team that is widely popular? If you are agreeing to those aforementioned points, then Armour should be as popular and Storm and vice versa. Gambit should be as popular as Wolverine and vice versa. I think you get my point, its not just a team that makes a character popular, its how they can connect with the average reader generates the popularity.
2.) Hmmm not necessarily. A lot of people who like Storm and who would go see her in a movie, or pick up a video game and play her in Marvel vs Capcom 3, isn't necessarily going to pick up a comic book. Furthermore, the majority of comic readers happen to be white and male, which is why most comics are dominated with white male characters, because the readers typically want to be able to identify to their superhero of choice. This was one main reason people had issue with Hudlin's writing of Storm after she married BP, because her characterization focused on her being black, her race, which turned a lot of readers off.
3.) How can you compare them based on solo popularity when Storm has never had a solo on-going that was pushed and marketed in a way that Ms. Marvel has for her titles. No spite against Ms. Marvel, she is a cool character, but based on overall exposure comics and outside comics included, Storm trumps her.
No, I'm saying she's in so many X-Men things because she's a popular X-Men character. Other characters will have appeared in less X-Men things, because they are less popular X-Men characters.
I'm using solo comic books as an example, as it's the only fair way I can think of to compare them, unless there was a solo game, film or whatever released for each character, at similar times.
Well as I said, if we can't compare the comics we have the ability to compare, because there hasn't been a solo Storm series, then I don't know what we can compare fairly. I have nothing against Storm, and yes she's had more exposure, but that doesn't mean she's more popular.
Log in to comment