@vance_astro said:
Well she's not of a lower social status that's why I'm not getting your point. By her own personal achievement she's amassed a fortune and become immensely popular. According to TV Guide she's the 3rd most popular celebrity on earth, their list is over 130 celebrities long and Smith & DiCaprio didn't even make the list. They have more power in the movie industry than she does but she's also not an actress so that's a pointless comparison. We don't even have to use Kim, we can us ANY A-list celebrity because the point i'm trying to make is the difference in their total earnings despite all being on the same list. According to the Ulmer Scale Will Smith & Reese Witherspoon are among the top 10 of bankable actors\actresses and Johnny Depp is worth more than both of them combined. Do you get my point now? Among A-list celebrities the earnings aren't equal or in some cases they are way off but they are all earning enough and popular\recognizable enough to be at the same status level.
Maybe Khardsian is more popular than Leonardo DeCaprio and every other movie actor but you missed my point big time. People have RESPECT for actors (any or most) craftsmanship and they have an achieved status Khardsians status is more or less Ascribed status (her talent was to be on a reality show) and Paris Hilton had a father that was a good business man a made a hotel business. Therefor Khardsians status is a different kind and many people don't have respect for it because she is famous for being famous. HUGE different.
@vance_astro said:
The fact of the matter is this. The Fantastic Four is one of the most popular\recognizable superhero groups in comics. Among the hundreds of teams Marvel has and the possible 20-30 or so that have ever had books, they are 1 of ONLY 3 that has withstood the test of time. F4 isn't selling in the top 10 anymore and neither is Daredevil but those are still successful series by current comic standards. They are still making enough that after over 600 issues they are still going. If you compare Spider-Man's films to just about any character you think is A-list that has had films he's going to put up better numbers. Spider-Man 1,2,& 3 independently outsold everything accept Avengers & The Dark Knight.
History has very little to do with being on a list if you can be earn any money then you aren't an a list. Fantastic Four was the 58 selling comic last month 58! that is nowhere near being an a list. And yes there is some double shipping. Iron Man was pretty close at outselling Spider-man. You have just accepted that the Spider-manAvengers and Batman are in a different league than FF.
@vance_astro said:
honestly don't even know what we're arguing here at this point. I'm sure ultimately whatever point is trying to be made here doesn't refute the A-list status of any character.
Simply discussing your narrow view (and that is a viewpoint you find with many americans. That you have a patriotism about what is america and that you are not so likely to accept other cultures. You mostly see your own movies, listen to your own music and read your own (comic) books. There are some import of Japaness culture but it is mostly limited to geek culture (comic, cartoons and games). And therefore you viewpoint on what is an a list character is based on that and those have the viewpoints of European comics. Since it is neglected. Just because something isn't popular in the USA dosen't mean it can be an A list.
@vance_astro said:
I didn't contradict myself. I said what I meant and never went back on it. I said that I don't consider Manga, comics and at no point did I take that back, so I don't have a clue what you're talking about. What I did say was i'm not going to argue with you whether they are comics are not, not because I'm agreeing that they are but because I don't care what anyone else considers a comic, on that same note though the only reason we are talking about this is because you said I have a narrow view of "comics" which regardless if I do or not isn't even relevant to what we're actually arguing.
The reason we are having this discussing is because you said that america sells most comics. That is not the chase it is Japan. Comics is a lot more mainstream in Japan than it will ever be in the Western World. Saying manga isn't comics is not only a narrow view it is a viewpoint that goes against reality. it is like saying a monkey isn't a mammal.
@vance_astro said:
We aren't arguing whether Blade's films were more successful than Daredevil's we're arguing whether Daredevil was a flop or not which based on what was spent making it, it wasn't. You named Green Lantern as "A-list whose film was also less successful than Blade's and Daredevil's was so you just refuted your own argument. In regards to your Spider-Man point, that doesn't disprove DD's A-list status either because Spider-Man has had more shows than EVERY Marvel superhero. Why we are comparing Daredevil SPECIFICALLY to Spider-Man is beyond me. The only characters YOU believe are A-list as far as American Superheroes are concerned that are comparable to Spider-Man as far as earnings are Batman & Superman and Wolverine is getting there he's far beyond everyone else.
Jesus are you even reading what i'm writting?
First of al you started comparing Blade with Daredevil. Second I proved that Blade made more money per dollar than Daredevil and therefore daredevil should have earned more money than it did. Higher budget=higher box-office but it didn't when you cut the expensive for the movie away that gave around the same amount of money. Daredevil should have had a much higher box office. Therefore it was a flop.
Thirdly I said Green Lantern was an a list comic book character/franchise. How many Green Lantern themed books are there? 5-6? The movie was a flop no doubt a about that.
Fourthly of all I compare Daredevil to many a list characters like Superman, Batman and so on. Not only Spider-man. Batman, Superman, Hulk and so on has historical been in more tv shows, movies ext than Daredevil.
@vance_astro said:
You can say that was your point but that's not what you said but as my last response just said Daredevil is A-list whether you narrow it down or not and so is Thor & so is Deadpool & the Punisher.
Yes I did:
@tupiaz said:
@vance_astro said:. I simply said that when you are talking about a-list comic book characters (and not Marvel a-list character) you have to include all characters and not only american style nor Marvel
When you are talking about a list comic book characters you talk about every comic boom character. When you are talking about a list american style comics you do that and she you are talking about A-list Marvel comic book characters you do that. The point is clearly when you use the phrase A-list comic book character you talk about every comic book characther and not limited list.
@vance_astro said:
@tupiaz said:
It is true I didn't mentioned any European or Japaness comics but that was because I didn't wanted to side track the topic to much.
My point exactly.
Your point has been that manga is not a comic and European comics aren't know as comic book characters. I just named a few a list characters I didn't think it was necessary to namedrop every character. A list characters still includes bot manga and european style comic book characters. which you have been against the entire time.
Log in to comment