" @lazystudent said:

" @courtney12490:  hell i would happily check the women out over the other 100% of the time in real life, but thing is i enjoy games and comics and violence and gore are  widely used tools now days so its become less tabboo,  thou essentially both are playing to animalistic nature. "

That's true. "

" @courtney12490 said:

" @lazystudent said:

" @courtney12490:  hell i would happily check the women out over the other 100% of the time in real life, but thing is i enjoy games and comics and violence and gore are  widely used tools now days so its become less tabboo,  thou essentially both are playing to animalistic nature. "

That's true. "

Appealing to this part of the brain is how people are usualy brianwashed, since can by pass higher brain functions and  make people almost feral buy making thoose instricnts your primal ones with a enough conditioning of course. I would like to note iam not a nutcase this is just somethig i had to learn about as part of profiling course at uni lol "

" @lazystudent said:

" @courtney12490 said:

" @Caligula said:

" @aztek the lost said:

" @RiceFox said:

" @aztek the lost said:

" @DH69 said:

" so they banned a pornsite? "

it's not a porn site, it's art!
 

I'd say porn could be art. Just like everything else... "

actually you have it in reverse, art is porn...artworks have been pornographic for hundreds more years then porn has been deemed taboo "

true, when did nudity become "evil" i'll never understand it. "

I will never understand how violence and blood/gore in movies is more acceptable than seeing somebody's boob.  "

Exactly violence is far  more damging to people after all, never heard anybody coming back from seeing a chick with post dramatic stress issues do you lol "

Right? I will just never understand the mentality that seeing somebody savagely murdered and dismembered is more appropriate than seeing some skin. "

Bah, these "cons" are all exactly that. Attend one, and you'll have to stay in the shower for a week to wash the stench of naked corporate greed off yourself (the fanboy funk is another matter; that will never come off). This event has gone the way of E3: a venue for executive bean-counters to shamelessly hawk their latest wares. It's all glitz and glamour and no actual substance. So, who's getting the SG's booth this year, the Twilight groupies?

This makes me a sad panda =(

" @Sparda said:

" Can.....someone tell me what Suicidegirls are, exactly? I get the idea that they're pornography or something, and I read their wikipedia page but I still don't really get it. Is it porn of fictional characters or something? Why is this even at Comic-Con, if so?  I'm confused. "

the SuicideGirls are one of the three essentials to a fulfilled life, the other two beings comics and (ACCESS DENIED)  they are not fictional characters, they're a group of pin-up models who excel at being the opposite of the stereotypes so they are like wild partiers, lots of tattoos and piercings, those kind of things...they're like feminists, only naked "

This sucks, hopefully the'll at Comic-con next year.

They interviewed Grant Morrison once.

What's a little harm in tattooed booby? Honestly.

That is one sad sad thing. Hot girl dressed up like comic book chars covered in tats and with a punk rock attitude baned. Awwww thats just sad.

"they're a group of pin-up models who excel at being the opposite of the stereotypes so they are like wild partiers, lots of tattoos and piercings, those kind of things...they're like feminists, only naked "

just for the record, there are NO sex acts on the site or in any of their licensed merchandise. 
 
there is no penetration. the closest thing to a sex act is the occasional set with two girls, where you'll get some implied action, but no actual contact that's more explicit than kissing or touching a boob. 
 
it's just boobs, man. being naked isn't a "sex act". if you don't like them that's fine, and if you don't think they should be at con that's fine, but running around saying they force girls to do sex acts on camera is just plain ridiculous. not to mention, girls often have to work really hard to become a SG; it's completely voluntary. and if and when they no longer want to be involved in the site, then they leave. simple as that. how the hell do you force someone on the other side of the world to get naked and then send you pictures?
 
since when does naked = porn? 

What do Suicide Girls have to do with comics in the first place?

Uh... they aren't banned. 
 
Comic-Con International's Director of Marketing and Public Relations David Glanzer said:

 "No one is banned...My understanding is that SuicideGirls didn't have a booth and there is a 400+ waiting list...We got a report that they were handing out material that was not all ages appropriate. It's happened before where companies have not complied with our standards ... Does that mean that they're banned for life? No, we don't do that. Next year could be a different thing."    

Doesn't have any effect on me if they're not making an appearance.  I personally find a real relationship with a woman much more fulfilling than this sort of thing.

" Uh... they aren't banned. 
 
Comic-Con International's Director of Marketing and Public Relations David Glanzer said:

 "No one is banned...My understanding is that SuicideGirls didn't have a booth and there is a 400+ waiting list...We got a report that they were handing out material that was not all ages appropriate. It's happened before where companies have not complied with our standards ... Does that mean that they're banned for life? No, we don't do that. Next year could be a different thing."    

Seems like a lot of people are completely ignoring this bit. "

"

I'd like to point out that pornographic material can be considered dangerous in the sense that it has in some cases, awakened a more violent side in male activity, to the point of sexual abuse or plain flat out rape.

" What do Suicide Girls have to do with comics in the first place? "

" When I spoke to Missy, she was told that she and the SuicideGirls had been banned. Did they say it? Is SDCC going back on their original statement? They obviously told Missy Suicide one thing, and the LAWeekly another, Maybe they didn't want to look bad. That's what the rest of the article is about. "

I can not believe how ridiculous this all is.  Regardless if some one is taking full frontal shots or hiding, as some one said "down there", it is still considered porn.  It's comic-con.  Notice how there is nothing to do with porn in the title?  Get over it and stop being a bunch of pervs.

" I can not believe how ridiculous this all is.  Regardless if some one is taking full frontal shots or hiding, as some one said "down there", it is still considered porn.  It's comic-con.  Notice how there is nothing to do with porn in the title?  Get over it and stop being a bunch of pervs. "

" @xxSadisticSmilexx said:

" I can not believe how ridiculous this all is.  Regardless if some one is taking full frontal shots or hiding, as some one said "down there", it is still considered porn.  It's comic-con.  Notice how there is nothing to do with porn in the title?  Get over it and stop being a bunch of pervs. "

They have a comic book. It's published by Devils Due. They have the right to be there according to SDCC's guidelines, unless they really did commit a crime. "

" @xxSadisticSmilexx said:

" I can not believe how ridiculous this all is.  Regardless if some one is taking full frontal shots or hiding, as some one said "down there", it is still considered porn.  It's comic-con.  Notice how there is nothing to do with porn in the title?  Get over it and stop being a bunch of pervs. "

They have a comic book. It's published by Devils Due. They have the right to be there according to SDCC's guidelines, unless they really did commit a crime. "

" I can not believe how ridiculous this all is.  Regardless if some one is taking full frontal shots or hiding, as some one said "down there", it is still considered porn.  It's comic-con.  Notice how there is nothing to do with porn in the title?  Get over it and stop being a bunch of pervs. "

Fair enough.  I didn't exactly mean to rant.  Sorry if I came off that way.

" a valid company who have been involved in comics are being pushed aside due to their slightly risqué nature"

" @.Mistress Redhead. said:

" a valid company who have been involved in comics are being pushed aside due to their slightly risqué nature"

Nowhere in the article is it implied that this is the case. They are allegedly being "pushed aside" for selling adult content to minors without carding. "

" Fair enough.  I didn't exactly mean to rant.  Sorry if I came off that way. "

" @Vortex13: I see your point.  However as the article stated, they were selling adult DVDs.  So I think there is more to it then just promoting their comic, even if it is slightly on the agenda. "

I'm submitting a segment to Comic Geek Speak about this. It's just ridiculous! I mean, at NYCC they have booth after booth of hentai!

" If they actually sold one of the DVDs without checking ID then I see no problem banning them. "

" @Vortex13: I see your point.  However as the article stated, they were selling adult DVDs.  So I think there is more to it then just promoting their comic, even if it is slightly on the agenda. "

 The fact SDCC ridiculously let's porn stars have booths at comic con shows they don't have a problem with this kind of thing, so I'm inclined to believe the reasons SDCC gives for banning them.

That sucks.

What a crock.