Comic Vine Review

0 Comments

Superman #14 - H'el on Earth: Build a Parachute on Your Way Down Review

3

H'el comes to Earth, and he's set his sights on Superboy.

The Good

The story of H'el -- or at least, the story the character describes as his own in the most recent issue of SUPERMAN -- changes things about the way Superman made it to Earth. The decision to place Superman and Supergirl into a pod to get them to safety wasn't something taken lightly, and according to this new character (also from Krypton), he claims to have been the test subject used by Kal-El's father to test whether the pod could make it safely to Earth. H'el's character claims to be from Krypton as well, and claims to have known Jor-El, Superman's father and worked directly with him. One of the things I liked about this issue is the way Lobdell provides readers with little hints and small pieces of information. For example, in H'el's speech about his trip to Earth, the character claims that the ship took him "too close to Black Stars" which might explain why he seems to be kind of crazy and his powers seem to be very different from Superman's (he has telekinesis and is able to manipulate people). I think that the character is interesting and the story that is evolving is interesting, too. The decision to create a character that has a similar lineage (is from Krypton) to be the adversary that would bring Superman, Supergirl and Superboy together in a crossover story is a good one.

I liked the art, I think Rocafort always does a great job and I find that one of his greatest skills is his ability to be consistent. He doesn't always work on his panel backgrounds and that does sometimes take away from setting the scene in this issue, but I can appreciate how pretty everyone looks.

The Bad

I like Superman, I really do, and I even like reading a Superman that feels something for Lois Lane, but playing the part of weird/creepy jealous friend-who-she-never-dated is not something I want to see Superman doing. There is a scene at the start of the issue where Clark is visited by Lois Lane and reveals to the reader in his internal dialogue that he has looked through Lois' phone. Clark then confronts Lois as if she were a cheating girlfriend and complains about the fact that she plans on moving in with her significant other. What the heck? In the previous issues Superman was shown to have some backbone and integrity by not sticking around at the Daily Planet. Where has that backbone gone? Where is the integrity? It's a scene that really paints the character in a negative light. It's one thing for Clark to be a sensitive character, but jealousy does not look very pretty on him and I am so not a fan of whiny Superman. Bottom line is, Superman is better than this whiny, melodramatic, jealous "friend" to Lois Lane.

One of the best qualities about the character is that he is really smart. Intelligence is an integral part of Clark's character and is something commonly overlooked by writers. Writing a character who is super-powered and super-smart might not be easy, but it should be expected. When Superman meets Supergirl in this issue it takes him a relatively long amount of time to realize that she is able to communicate with Clark in English. I feel like this is something Superman would have noticed immediately since he's always had to speak to Kara in Kryptonian. Clark manages to change and fly with Kara to a park and insult her intelligence before even thinking to question her about how she is able to communicate with him in English.

The Verdict

This is a pretty issue. Rocafort delivers making all the characters in this book look really pretty, but he does fail in giving these characters a setting by not adding much to the backgrounds. There is a lot of empty space surrounding the panels and it feels like he doesn't make very good use of the pages.

I think the premise for this story and this crossover is interesting. I think having a character that is connected to all three -- Superman, Supergirl and Superboy -- through lineage is a good idea and it will be interesting to see how this story unfolds. And while I think the premise is interesting and the story is well structured and well organized, I did have some issues with the portrayals of certain characters and the dialogue in this comic. I think it reflected poorly on characters like Superman and I did expect more from him than what we saw here. Overall, if you are looking to jump into this cross-over, then this is definitely an issue you will want to pick up.

57 Comments
  • 57 results
  • 1
  • 2
Edited by G_Money_Christmas

I'm super excited for this issue, I have been since Superman 13 and with the buildup from Superboy and Supergirl. This is bound to be a great story... even if there are some short-comings. The H'El on Earth story is looking to be awesome and I can't wait until I can pick this one up after work tonight. This is easily the issue I'm most excited about this week.

I wasn't a fan of Rocafort's work when I first saw it but it has definitely grown on me and he has become one of my favorites. From the preview I saw, the art in this issue looks great.

Posted by mk111

Wow. Clark sounds really awful in this review. Creepy jealous friend, huh? Not good.

Posted by CircularLogic

Not surprised. Lobdell's entire strategy in the new 52 has been to dumb characters down to appeal to the lowest common denominator. Of course since Superman's sales always struggle to keep up to less known characters he decides to make Clark so simple that he's just unappealing.

Posted by The Stegman
Yeah, regardless of if Clark comes off as  a jealous creeper, I'm still excited about this  crossover.
Posted by Ironhawk22

Yeah Clark seems extremely creepy. I don't think I'll be picking this up. Not a Lobdell fan, and despite finding the preview somewhat enjoyable I just don't think it's worth it.

Posted by xAnimosity

I enjoyed issue 13 and the art is great. Looking forward to this issue. Its fun to see a different portrayal of a character.

Posted by wessaari

Guys, I just wanna come on here to relay something that has been on my mind for a while. People have opinions, and on ComicVine people are treated with disrespect for those opinions. I have seen Babs defend a reviewer who for the whole issue gave no positive points and made a 5 long page complaint about an issue. Now, it seems to me it is established that we shouldnt disrespect one another on this site, because frankly we are mostly adults, and we can behave as such. The same should go for the artist and writer. I dont agree with Babs review, but she gave respect to the creators of this issue, and I give respect for that. Lobdell is one of those writers who gets crap from people everyday, and its sad and annoying to only here that. Now i am standing up for Scott, because this should be a step into stopping this happening to other writers and artists. We can not like their work, we can critique and say what we feel is wrong with it. But when i hear "Lobdell shouldnt write anymore, or Gail Simone is a shitty writer" it just gets me mad and disappointed that no one can behave like the adults they are. Thx for hearing me out, and try to stay constructive and respectful

Posted by Lvenger

I knew Lobdell's good streak wouldn't last forever. This creepy jealous friend role of Clark's sounds lame. And Lobdell promised to give Clark and Lois a good relationship under his pen. Doesn't seem to have happened yet.

Posted by Reignmaker

Throne of Atlantis and Death of the Family are enough for me. Pass.

Edited by CircularLogic

@wessaari: saying someone is a sh*tty writer and that should stop writing is typically hyperbole, which is a writing technique meant to emphasize how much we dislike someones work. in this context, is means that we feel that the overall quality of his/her body of work is incredibly poor and, especially in a relatively young universe, does a lot of harm to DC as a whole. Is it a bit low-brow to say these things instead of a structured critique? sure. But when you release work into the public we have the right to criticize you as much as we want, and like it or not sometimes saying things like "Scott Lobdell shouldn't be allowed to write anymore because he consistently ruins popular characters" is simple way to get your point across

Posted by evilvegeta74

@wessaari: I mmay have said something similar before, in fact I have. How an individual rates a title shouldn't ever deter a fan from grabbing a title that they desire. I check out reveiws and take them with a grain of salt, I will purchase any title I want regardless of reviews, I feel like this is the best direction to go in for any consumer, unless we are taliking about high priced goods.

Posted by BigRed125

I will admit I kind of like the jealous/creeper superman angle of the story for the reason that its character development. I guess the way I look at it... Superman's been upset about Lois having a boyfriend since the beginning of the title right? Supes has a hurdle to jump over, not just with his feelings for Lois, but also with the abuse of his powers (invading Lois's privacy). Come on guys, we've ALL had someone who didn't care for us the same way we did for them. I'm not saying we've all been creepers about it, but we've been there before. Its humanizing the character, and making him more relatable. Plus, if you were in Supes's shoes, and you had the powers he had, wouldn't you find it incredibly difficult to not abuse them in some way? That's just my two cents on the subject. Of course I will retract my defense if it turns out that none of that happens and we instead end up with stories about Stalker Supes, or Creeper Clark.

Posted by G_Money_Christmas

@evilvegeta74 said:

@wessaari: I mmay have said something similar before, in fact I have. How an individual rates a title shouldn't ever deter a fan from grabbing a title that they desire. I check out reveiws and take them with a grain of salt, I will purchase any title I want regardless of reviews, I feel like this is the best direction to go in for any consumer, unless we are taliking about high priced goods.

Agreed. I would buy this even if Babs gave it a 1/5. I want the whole H'El on Earth story and I'm not going to get it if I skip this issue. I am also collecting all of the Superman books. Also, if you look at the reader score, it got a 5/5 from 6 votes. Babs' opinion shouldn't go down as fact

Posted by doordoor123

@G_Money_Christmas said:

@evilvegeta74 said:

@wessaari: I mmay have said something similar before, in fact I have. How an individual rates a title shouldn't ever deter a fan from grabbing a title that they desire. I check out reveiws and take them with a grain of salt, I will purchase any title I want regardless of reviews, I feel like this is the best direction to go in for any consumer, unless we are taliking about high priced goods.

Agreed. I would buy this even if Babs gave it a 1/5. I want the whole H'El on Earth story and I'm not going to get it if I skip this issue. I am also collecting all of the Superman books. Also, if you look at the reader score, it got a 5/5 from 6 votes. Babs' opinion shouldn't go down as fact

Well, it is her opinion.

As far as I know, she isn't a big Superman fan and not a fan of Lobdell. This is just an assumption. I've been here for a while now. I've actually been visiting this site since it started. I remember when it was under construction.

Comic reviews are subjective.

Posted by G_Money_Christmas

@doordoor123: I agree very much on the subjectivity of the reviews. There are only so many critics on this site and they may get stuck reviewing a character or a book written/drawn by someone they don't like. Reviews can give some insight into the comic's content but as is the same with movies, if you want to read the book/see the movie, don't base seeing it on one person's opinion... which, judging by the comments, many people have done.

Posted by KnightRise

Rockafort can sure draw some sexy people. Hubahuba

Posted by Superguy1591

I don't mean to sound rude, but please disregard this review. It is obviously coming from a very bias viewpoint of someone who isn't a fan of Superman or the writer, Scott Lobdell. Anytime you hear someone say "I like Superman, I really do" you should know that THEY DON'T LIKE SUPERMAN, they really don't. A fan of Superman would just be critical of him, they wouldn't need to justify it by saying how they're a fan.

Now, let me debunk this review. First of all, the whole creepy "stalker" friend thing is blown out of proportion. Clark didn't peak at Lois' phone because he wanted to creep her, he peaked because she did it in front of Perry and Lois never did that. It was something he was sorry for doing to begin with. And, now, in this book, he's just hurt to find out about the relationship. He doesn't confront her as a cheating girlfriend, he confronts her as a friend who felt left out in another friend's life. But this is besides the point, this is subjective and can be perceived in any way. It's only about 5 pages anyway, and it's not the selling point of the story.

On the intelligence comment, she loses me, again. Clark is in shock that she just barged into his apartment, he's probably panicking to death and not in a clear state of mind. Why is it then hard to believe that Clark wouldn't have noticed that Kara spoke English?

I agree with her good verdicts, though. I don't know how with so much good she could possibly give a review a 3/5 when it is so much fun to read. Lobdell writes the book with a certain charm, humor and depth that makes it so enjoyable. His dialogue in this book is top notch and he's very descriptive, which I like because I want to read a lot. Rocafort's art is also top notch! Man, this dude can draw an action sequence. All the characters shine and all the colors stick out. Lobdell's dialogue and Rocafort's art keep you wanting more and more. I urge all of you to pick this book up and give it a shot!

It is an emphatic 5/5 and is just as enjoyable as Wonder Woman, Batman, Aquaman and Animal Man in the new 52. Pick it up, it is worth it! Trust me.

If I offended you, Babs, I apologize, but I vehemently disagree with your review.

Posted by UltimateSMfan

i loved this issue!! had 2 problems though-totally agree with sara on that page where supes doesnt realize kara's speaking english and goes on sarcasticaly insultin her,the rest of his dialogue was fine just not that page and where is the backwards 's' on h'el's chest???we saw it it Superboy 14 then after that nuthin,seems kinda weird...

Posted by Lvenger

@Superguy1591: It's good but nowhere near the level of Morrison's writing on Action Comics. Lobdell's only just finding his feet so I don't feel a 5 out of 5 can be given to him yet IMO.

Posted by Squalleon

I don't think this review is exactly fair but we all have different tastes!

I would give it 4/5 because i don't like how :

H'el fooled supergirl into thinking supes attacked her....seriously felt forced and how the hell H'el (pun intended) could do that o_0
Posted by Dernman

Ugh I can't stop thinking about that scene with Clark and Lois without seeing him as creepy, jealous, pathetic, friend now that Babs has mentioned it. Dern you Babs. *Shakes my fist in the air* ;p

Posted by RedX9

I think the problem with this issue is the writing of Superman and his personality. He comes off as too about himself and also he seems very condescending. Lobdell is really showing me he cannot write Superman and his Clark Kent is a boring character who's too rash and whiny that there's very little to enjoy about him.

Posted by Babs

@Superguy1591 said:

I don't mean to sound rude, but please disregard this review. It is obviously coming from a very bias viewpoint of someone who isn't a fan of Superman or the writer, Scott Lobdell. Anytime you hear someone say "I like Superman, I really do" you should know that THEY DON'T LIKE SUPERMAN, they really don't. A fan of Superman would just be critical of him, they wouldn't need to justify it by saying how they're a fan.

If I offended you, Babs, I apologize, but I vehemently disagree with your review.

The only offense I take is to you claiming I don't like a character I actually LOVE when I feel he is written well. But, okay.

Staff
Posted by jointron33

@UltimateSMfan: He was trying to rush her the hell out. Why would he be like "You can speak English?" in front of Lois?

Posted by Superguy1591

@Squalleon: He's telekinetic, like Superboy. It might have something to do with the black star solar radiation he absorbed that gave him that power.

Posted by Squalleon

@Superguy1591 said:

@Squalleon: He's telekinetic, like Superboy. It might have something to do with the black star solar radiation he absorbed that gave him that power.

yeah (thought about it) it just felt forced.......kinda bad

@RedX9: Lodbell actually does a great job at writing the superman that Johns and Morrison started,do you remember his first appearence he was brash and arrogant..so no complains there.As for Clark Kent for the first time in years he is not a side character,he gets some time in the book and depth in his releationships with his colleagues

Posted by zachkastner

H'el is mega powerful and I'm curious as to what that Quazar zone thing did to him and how this'll tie back into the zero issue.

Kenneth's art was gorgeous so I'll toss is a weak fisted 5/5. It kept me interested beyond belief and I am curious on Luthor's future involvement.

Posted by JoseDRiveraTCR7

The way DC has been protraying Clark's relationship with Lois has been weird. Dude comes off as clingy. DC still doesn't know how to characterize Superman properly. The issue was good though. 3 stars.

@Superguy1591 said:

I don't mean to sound rude, but please disregard this review. It is obviously coming from a very bias viewpoint of someone who isn't a fan of Superman or the writer, Scott Lobdell. Anytime you hear someone say "I like Superman, I really do" you should know that THEY DON'T LIKE SUPERMAN, they really don't. A fan of Superman would just be critical of him, they wouldn't need to justify it by saying how they're a fan.

I guess the saying about people who make assumptions is true after all.

Posted by Zoch81

I enjoyed this issue a lot the action was top notch and the art was really great and dialogue was also good I like way Lobdell writes Superman I would give this 4 out 5 stars, also seems H'el has Telekinetic powers like Superboy as well being a Telepath thought that was interesting.

Online
Posted by ltbrd

@Superguy1591: Superman is my favorite character, always has been, always will be. I started reading comics when I was 3 years old and Superman and Spider-Man have always been one and two in my reading list. However, that doesn't mean I've always been happy with the direction writers have taken the character. I began reading just as the 1986 reboot and Byrne's Man of Steel series was hitting stores. So my perspective of the character is based around the late 80's, but as I've grown up I've gone back and read both Golden, Silver, and Bronze Age stories to understand what Superman had done before and people telling me about all the great Silver Age stories and such.

Why I state all that, and why do I think ComicVine staff members state it as well, is because too often on this site someone will be extremely critical of a title and one of the first responses he/she gets is "Well if you have that much to complain about just stop reading it". Its happens to me every.....single.....time I bring up complaints about a Superman title. But to quote Office Space, "Why should I change my name, he's the one that sucks". As a life-long fan of a character I'm not going to stop reading it just because I don't agree with the writing (if that was the case I would have skipped the late 90's to 2005-ish era of Superman). But it also doesn't mean I'm not going to say anything about something I don't like.

Personally, I don't care who the writer or artist is. If I don't like it I don't like it. I'm not enjoying Morrison's run on Action Comics. I feel that his need to invoke a Silver Age style doesn't fit with the expectations of a modern audience and comes off too hocky when compared to other titles. Its made worse by just how different Action Comics is to Superman as titles (and let's not go into his depiction in Justice League......stupid, flipping idea to have him float and all). At least in his (Morrison's) last run with Batman you saw that Batman and Detective Comics were following enough similarities to not present almost two distinct characterizations.

I agree with you that Clark's depiction can be interpreted differently by the reader, however I think the bigger issue is that Clark/Superman shouldn't be depicted like this at all. I'm getting sick of seeing a "revamped"/"rebooted"/"re-designed" Superman where the biggest change is that they make him whine about his differences and lonliness, etc, etc, etc. THIS IS SUPERMAN!!!! He's supposed to be an inspiration. He's supposed to show a morality so different from the rest of the world. He's supposed to set the example. There has never been a timeframe in the Man of Steel's existance where "dumbing him down", "making him more human", or "emphasizing his isolation" has ever worked. Yet DC keeps doing it as if they expect readers to finally enjoy those characterizations. Its frustrating and almost sad that writers today can't get this character, the superhero that began superheroes, correct.

You're right, there are some fun aspects to Lobdell's run so far. He's done a good job of representing Superman's powers (though I disagree with his implied strength limits compared to what has been shown of his durability and other abilities) and letting readers glimpse a more open and aggresive Clark Kent and Superman compared to what we got in the first 12 issues. But the basic flaws of the new 52 depiction and characterization are still there and they are still a very glaring contrast to what our collective conception of the character should be.

The "hurt friend" and relationship issue is just depicted poorly. Its an overboard reaction to how even most adults would react. To play the sex card on this one, I don't see guys getting upset to find out they weren't in the loop on something. That's just not something a guy gets upset about and its not something I could see a young adult reader getting upset about either. So I don't understand what audience Lobdell's trying to target with the emotions shown by Clark as a result of this situation. Its not about him being passive or not being passive. Its about how the situation was presented to the reader. As for the Kara thing. Yeah, I think Babs may have gotten wrapped around the axil for no reason on that one cause Clark did recover well to get Lois out of the apartment though at the same time it did feel a bit weird that a guy who can think and react at mach speeds would take so long to figure out Kara was speaking English. If it had been part of his rant, like ending with "and when did you learn to speak English", as an acknowledgement that he picked up on it I'd be completely on your side on that issue. The fact that it was written as though the lightbulb went off at just that momeny again just feels out of character.

So why did I go on this long rant (other than getting lost in thought). Simple. People need to stop posting about why someone shouldn't be listened to or calling someone a liar when they don't even know the person and STICK TO THE DAMN ISSUE BEING DISCUSSED!!!! Who cares how much anyone does or does not like a character, writer, or artist. We're all hear to discuss a passion that we all share and as such everyone should be respected enough to let them say their peace and either leave it at that or begin a debate or pros/cons, point/counterpoint on the issue. Calling someone out on meaningless crap like "if they say they like something than they really don't" (add retarded stoner high schooler voice to that quote for added effect please) is in itself meaningless crap. Stick to the freaking topic and stop worrying about whether or not someone is as big a fan as you are.

Posted by Icon

I loved the dialogue and banter in this issue. Overall, that was one of the highlights for me. Ah well, to each their own. :]

Posted by ccraft

@BigRed125: Agreed, it may be a tad creepy what superman did, but I would have done the same...

Posted by Scantenii

This book got me interested in the H'el on earth story...curious to see where it goes...

Posted by MeloDet

I loved the issue, but I could not get past the Lois stuff at the beginning. And no, I am not talking about him being creepy. I have mentioned it before, but the differences in character between this and Justice League are absolutely horrendous. You would think with how serious DC seems to be about WW/SM that they would coordinate with all the authors to make sure it goes off well, but instead we are left with two completely different Supermen(with regard to love interests). JL Superman seems to have no reservations about his relationship with Diana, and he is the one actively pursuing her, however in the Superman books he seems to still be very much in love with Lois Lane(so much so that he is annoyingly jealous/creepy), and only slightly interested in Diana. It doesn't even seem like he is conflicted about having feelings for two women! He comes off as having strong feelings for Lois Lane and hardly thinking about Diana, yet in JL he is making the moves. I am fine with WW/SM, I am fine with LL/SM, I am even fine with Superman being conflicted, having feelings for both of them and choosing who is right for him. I am not however, ok with him loving Lois yet dating Diana without ever actively thinking about her. I could keep going, but I think I have made my point. DC needs to sit Geoff Johns and Scott Lobdell down so that they can figure this out once and for all.

Posted by SandMan_

Eh...

Posted by TheNamelessOne

My request to ComicVine: Please keep Sara Lima out of any Superman related review/podcast commentary. This is my sincere request.

Posted by Superguy1591

@Babs: Well, I'm not too proud that I can't admit when I owe someone an apology so I'll go ahead and do just that. I apologize for my insensitivity and unwarranted accusation.

Though I must say that the only reason why I thought you were not a fan of the man in blue was because, though G-Man usually reviews AC and Superman, I've come across your stuff on this site from time to time and you come off across as a staunch Batman fangirl who've I rarely ever see talk Superman (Though I only come for the Superman/Action Comics review so I'm not sure of your history). I just assumed it was just another Batman fan who wants to attack Superman. It was wrong of me to allocate such cynical values towards you.

Once again, I apologize. Though I still stand by my review that your negatives are not negative enough to warrant a 3/5 grade.

Posted by sethysquare

omg. this issue is awesome sauce.

Posted by G_Money_Christmas

@sethysquare: I'm not trying to say that Babs is wrong on every front or anything, it just doesn't sound like she's a fan of Superman. I do agree with her on a few points but after finally reading the issue myself, I disagree with score she gave.

Posted by sethysquare

@G_Money_Christmas said:

@sethysquare: I'm not trying to say that Babs is wrong on every front or anything, it just doesn't sound like she's a fan of Superman. I do agree with her on a few points but after finally reading the issue myself, I disagree with score she gave.

turns out, babs didnt review any lobdell stuff. it was gman that did. me too i disagree on the score, i do however dislike anything to do with clark pining over lois. i do wish this whole thing would pass over and that superman would continue having a great relationship with diana.

Posted by sethysquare

@G_Money_Christmas: I am nevertheless a huge fan of scott and I thought this was a great issue. I would've given it a 5/5

Posted by G_Money_Christmas

@sethysquare: I agree... He needs to get over her. He is a super-human. He needs another super-human, not a normal person. I like Diana better anyway. I haven't read anything by Scott except for Superman but I think his work on this title is exponentially better than the writers before him. I gave the issue a 5/5 also. It does have its faults but the conflict between Kal and H'El has begun and that's what I've been looking forward to.

Posted by cc1738

IGN had a guy review this that hadn't read the first two parts of the crossover. Then he gave it a low review. So I came over to comicvine to read their review.

Posted by cloudzackvincent

i would give the book 4 stars and i just loved the art.

Posted by Teerack

This was a really great issue. I'm love the new team making the superman books there actually interesting and cool, and sooooo pretty looking :)

Posted by joeyesposito

@Superguy1591: Man, you found your way over here too, huh?

Posted by namtabmi

@Squalleon:

@Squalleon said:

I don't think this review is exactly fair but we all have different tastes!

I would give it 4/5 because i don't like how :

H'el fooled supergirl into thinking supes attacked her....seriously felt forced and how the hell H'el (pun intended) could do that o_0

Answering your spoiler hidden question::

H'el could change how he looked possibly due to the journey through different stars and solar "events" on his way to earth. (Just a guess).

Posted by namtabmi

Reviewing on a scale of 1-5 is difficult. I think 3 is on the low side.

The bad points brought up about superman being creepy jealous:

I didn't think it was creepy...more that he likes Lois a lot and was upset she didn't share with him -- She did say he's her best friend after all!

Loved the art! Rocafort did a solid job, the characters looked so good I didn't even notice the large amount of unused space mentioned...

Posted by Delphic

@Babs said:

The Bad

I like Superman, I really do, and I even like reading a Superman that feels something for Lois Lane, but playing the part of weird/creepy jealous friend-who-she-never-dated is not something I want to see Superman doing. There is a scene at the start of the issue where Clark is visited by Lois Lane and reveals to the reader in his internal dialogue that he has looked through Lois' phone. Clark then confronts Lois as if she were a cheating girlfriend and complains about the fact that she plans on moving in with her significant other. What the heck? In the previous issues Superman was shown to have some backbone and integrity by not sticking around at the Daily Planet. Where has that backbone gone? Where is the integrity? It's a scene that really paints the character in a negative light. It's one thing for Clark to be a sensitive character, but jealousy does not look very pretty on him and I am so not a fan of whiny Superman. Bottom line is, Superman is better than this whiny, melodramatic, jealous "friend" to Lois Lane.

One of the best qualities about the character is that he is really smart. Intelligence is an integral part of Clark's character and is something commonly overlooked by writers. Writing a character who is super-powered and super-smart might not be easy, but it should be expected. When Superman meets Supergirl in this issue it takes him a relatively long amount of time to realize that she is able to communicate with Clark in English. I feel like this is something Superman would have noticed immediately since he's always had to speak to Kara in Kryptonian. Clark manages to change and fly with Kara to a park and insult her intelligence before even thinking to question her about how she is able to communicate with him in English.

I'm not the biggest fan of the way Clark has been handled here lately either, but I just want to point out a couple of things about your issues with the issue. The first part being where you stated that Clark had looked through Lois phone. If you remember from the last issue he used his X-ray vision to look through Lois to see what she what she was texting, and his reasoning was because Lois doesn't normally text in front of Perry. His reasoning sort of hinted at that not only does Perry like people to text around him, thus the "smashed cells" comment, but also that for a character like Lois who is supposed to be this Putlizer prize winning journalist would probably not consider such behavior professional, so Clark is curious to what the exception is. It's still a little creepy because Clark is using his powers to his advantage to invade someones privacy, but at the same time it's not like he grabbed her phone when she wasn't looking and looked through the phone while crouching down to hide in some dark corner.

Now the deal with Supergirl and Clark not noticing she was speaking English. Clark was startled because Kara was standing in his apartment, in her uniform, in front of Lois and Clark (who was not in uniform). Clark was angry and not thinking clearly, because all that was going through his mind at that moment was: "Holy crap, my cover is blown! Now everyone is going to know I'm Superman." His only thought when Lois identified Kara as a "cosplayer" (yeah I'll get back to this), was to get Kara and Lois as far away from each other as possible. It's a cliche comical scene (or an attempt at one in this case), where someone is so angry and caught up in their own thoughts that they don't realize what's going on in front of them.

Now something I figure you would be a little upset over more regarding intelligence is how Lois is handled in this scene. Lois is a Pulitzer prize winning journalist who has worked with Clark for a long time apparently, and knows how he does things. So her first reaction upon seeing Kara pop up in Clark's apartment is that Clark is interviewing cosplayers? I'm sorry, but what? I would have found it more believable if she thought Clark was blogging an interview of the actual Supergirl, or since they were just arguing about "booty call" (a line which I still can't believe Clark said), that she had just met Clark's new "girlfriend". Instead her first reaction is cosplayers? Yeah somethings not quite right there.

Posted by FoxxFireArt

Wow, I missed reading several of the review from this week, but I heard how tumultuous things had gotten here on the podcast from the week. I can see what they were talking about. Things sure got heated.

I can't really speak to the contents, since I've only seen the preview that contains the opening scene Sara references. I completely agree with her assessment. Clark doesn't come off as very sympathetic. Which is confusing when the whole issue starts off with Lois walking in and telling what he should be doing. She doesn't come in asking her "best-friend" for an explanation or even sympathetic to his concerns. However, out of no where Clark throws her relationship issues into her face for no reason. I don't like that Clark keeps talking about how he shouldn't be doing something, but then does it anyway.

It's just another reason why I can't take the Superman and Wonder Woman relationship seriously, becasue the characters aren't. Despite everything Clark says about moving on. He obviously hasn't.

@TheNamelessOne said:

My request to ComicVine: Please keep Sara Lima out of any Superman related review/podcast commentary. This is my sincere request.

My request to Comic Vine: Let Sara Lima review any comic she wishes regardless of anyone who complains about her positions. It's fine to disagree, but telling someone to just be quiet is not interested in an honest debate.

@Superguy1591:

Just saying you don't mean to offend is not license to say something offensive. Just as how Clark may not intend to come off as creepy doesn't change the fact that he's doing something creepy. He was spying on her private life. Not out of concern for her well being, but becasue he was curious. Even though he says he probably shouldn't be doing it. That doesn't stop him. He knew what he was doing was wrong. It's the equivalent of looking into someone's email without their knowledge.

Not only do you mock Sara based on nothing more than a weak assumption of her likes and dislikes, but your original comment is patently false on it's base.

Anytime you hear someone say "I like Superman, I really do" you should know that THEY DON'T LIKE SUPERMAN, they really don't. A fan of Superman would just be critical of him, they wouldn't need to justify it by saying how they're a fan.

I believe she felt the need to justify becasue there are those who would just assume her critique was nothing more than her not being a Superman fan. A point that apparently missed you by a quarter mile.

  • 57 results
  • 1
  • 2