Comic Vine Review

505 Comments

Man of Steel

5

Kal-El returns to the big screen in an amazingly entertaining fashion.

Ladies and gentlemen, there's a new "best comic book movie" in town and it goes by the name of Man of Steel. Sporting great performances and breathtaking action sequences, Clark Kent's return thankfully lives up to the mountain of hype and anticipation we've endured for at least several months. This new take on the iconic character delivers a constantly epic atmosphere which mixes a more serious tone with a lot of over the top fun. And when I say "a lot," I mean it.

No Caption Provided

Yes, this is a reboot of Superman's origin -- a story we've seen countless times before -- but it doesn't suffer from a sense of overfamiliarity at all. They clearly draw elements from various comic stories from time to time ('Earth One' obviously inspired General Zod's broadcast and the symbol standing for hope comes from 'Birthright'), but for the most part, this is a mostly fresh take on the legendary character. After the grand sci-fi opening on Krypton (Russell Crowe's Jor-El is a boss), we fast forward to grown up Clark. From there, we're treated to emotionally compelling flashbacks about him learning to cope with his powers and receiving moral guidance from the Kents. There's some changes here and there to the mythos and I imagine some fans won't dig it, but for the most part, I think it's something many of us won't mind -- especially when countered by all of the things this film does so well.

Remember how The Avengers hit us with an astonishing and goosebump inducing battle in New York? I honestly believed a comic book movie (in the near future, that is) wouldn't be able to bring that level of greatness again, but Man of Steel totally does and then some. The action pieces are absolutely staggering and downright surreal. Director Zack Snyder fully unleashes the power behind these characters and when they throwdown it's visceral, intense and had my jaw dropped basically the entire time. While the two huge action scenes may be a bit too long for some, it was nothing but pure bliss for me -- I seriously can't get over how good they were and I was in awe.

My only minor gripe with these scenes was the lack of concern over the populated areas, but at least they tried to justify it each time (for example, one time Clark is beyond pissed and another time he tells them to leave). After all, Clark is new to this and he's not exactly dictating the fights all the time. It's something I can overlook, but when Clark tackles his enemy through a convenience store and blows up a gas station before the area is evacuated, I'm sure some of you will tilt your heads. And speaking of stores, holy product placement, Batman! If that kind of thing bugs you, then there's sure to be a few moments that'll make you groan.

No Caption Provided

What really sells every scene (you know, aside from super powered punches) are the superb performances and Hans Zimmer's excellent score. The music simply brings everything to the next level, making even seemingly basic moments come off as extraordinary and legendary. You'll definitely want to see this one in a theater with quality speakers.

Michael Shannon kills it as General Zod, delivering a commanding performance and truly selling the raw emotion behind his standout acts. As for Henry Cavill... well, the man just oozes "Superman." Some may complain he's a man of few words in this film, but the quieter moments with the character allow him to physically convey the tone and he does so extremely well. And, when he does chat, you can really sense the warmth, honesty and good will behind his version of Clark -- and seeing as he's a character meant to inspire us, that's critical. Also, I thought he and Amy Adams had fantastic chemistry and she definitely brings a brave and believable Lois Lane to the table. Aside from one Daily Planet employee having a silly line or two, the remainder of the cast does a more than able job as well.

No Caption Provided

It's clear Warner Bros. had a "go big or go home" mentality when kicking off the new direction for their DC universe and they delivered big time. I spotted at least two Easter Eggs which filled my face with such a goofy smile and I haven't been this excited about a movie universe's future since Tony Stark met Nick Fury. Speaking of which, there unfortunately wasn't a mid or post credits scene during my screening.

I do have some small problems with the film, but honestly, they're massively overshadowed by the things I loved. This isn't just my favorite comic book movie at the moment -- it's one of the best moviegoing experiences I've had in quite some time. With gripping performances and overflowing with absurdly impressive action, it's safe to say many of you out there will love Man of Steel every bit as much as I did. I know I'm definitely going to see it at least two more times.

505 Comments

Avatar image for hiplobo
HiploBo

11

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for redk
RedK

2541

Forum Posts

24245

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

Edited By RedK

already seen it twice, it was awesome, sure theirs a few things I'd like to of been changed like the dark knight rises but over all it was just the best film I've seen in ages, can't wait for the 2nd one and really hope they do a trilogy

Avatar image for azura_thena
Azura_Thena

140

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Azura_Thena

@hiplobo:

I disagree with a lot of what you said. The first thing that needs to be addressed is the clear misunderstanding that Superman does not kill. In the comics, he has killed Zod before in a canon Post Crisis issue. Not only that, but he killed Zod's subordinates as well. He had them defeated and THEN he chose to execute them. So as far as it being a problem to be included in this movie, I believe that to be an ignorant understanding of Superman. If anyone wants to then fall back on Reeve's Superman, let's not forget that he not only killed Zod in that one too, but he did it in an extremely violent and unnecessary fashion. He crushed a defenseless and therefore, defeated Zod's hand, threw him against a wall with enough force to surely break even more bones, and then let him fall to his death. He killed a virtually harmless opponent with a smile and felt no pain or anguish afterwards that Henry's felt. On top of that, he let a mentally handicapped person jump to his death and allowed Lois to viciously murder another defeated villain as well... again with an "aw shucks" smile on his face. Then they abandoned Luthor to the arctic north as Reeve went on a revenge agenda that could have potentially crippled a person that not only was beneath Superman at that point but also had no way of defending himself. If someone wants to complain about Superman actions that are decidedly un-Superman, they need to first address the former movie that is somehow preferred over the new one on the issue of killing, as well as address the killing Superman has done in the comics.

As far as the issue of not saving the humans that were around him, I am not sure if you are aware of this but Superman was kind of busy getting handled by other Kryptonians whenever there were humans around. No one died as a result of Superman's actions. He did the best he could when facing a small army of his equals. Also, in the comics, I don't believe Superman has ever had a fight that didn't result in several city blocks being completely destroyed. If you are angry at the movie for this, then surely the comics have angered you to the point where you need to be hospitalized.

I think you may have misunderstood the scene of Pa's death. Superman didn't give a fig about people knowing about his powers. His father did and specifically made the choice to sacrifice himself in order to protect Superman. Superman, as much has he clearly didn't want to, honored his father's wishes. He honored his father's choice and showed his father that not only does he respect him, but he trusts him as well. Your opinion that humanity would readily accept an alien among them is only your opinion. I believe it is an incorrect opinion though, we can't even accept each other. An alien with the power to annihilate us on a whim living among us would cause the exact kind of panic that Pa was afraid of.

It was a mostly serious movie but I don't know that I would call it joyless. Wondering who you are does not mean you are walking about with a deep depression. He didn't seem all that depressed to me when he found his mother alive and well. Saving Lois didn't throw Superman into a suicidal depression. I like comedy as much as anyone else but it is absolutely not necessary to prevent a movie from being labeled as 'joyless'. The modern Superman in comics has often been depicted as a brooding man, if that helps put your grievances to bed.

Lois always needs saving. I don't know why this is a problem for you and you are going to have to clarify what you mean by 'second rate woman', a vague statement that I find slightly offensive. Michael Shannon's performance was completely fine if you actually understood his character in this film.

It seems to me that you need to watch this movie again because I am of the opinion that you spent the entirety of this movie wrapped up in your inaccurate preconceived notions of who Superman is and what he should be to actually enjoy this film for what it was.

Avatar image for rich711
Rich711

264

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

Edited By Rich711

The fact is Novi hits the nail on the head with what was wrong with it when he said "choppy" and "all over the place". This director just doesnt know how to successfully tell a story. He is all flashy images for teenage boys with short attention spans. There was little to no character development, no real relationships created, and no fun moments. It's why you hear negative reviews of it from people like Bendis and Chuck Dixon because they are great storytellers. Not all comic book fans can tell a good story from a childish action-fest, plenty just buy something because it looks good and they think the character is "bad-ass". Rob Liefeld has made a fortune off of these fanboys. This director makes his money off the same demographic, the easily excited teenage boy and man-boys. I'm sure this movie will be loved by them and will be huge in Asia for the same reasons, until the next flashy thing catches their attention. It doesnt change that fact that anyone (whether they admit it or not) can see this is nothing more than an average addition to the new wave of superhero movies.

Avatar image for hiplobo
HiploBo

11

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By HiploBo

4/10

Man of Steel insults who Superman is and who Superman should be.

I truly am saddened that this movie will be the first exposure to Superman to some kids, or even some adults for that matter.

Problems:

Superman killed Zod--- Not to mention Superman surely kills hundreds of thousands of people by not taking the fight elsewhere, besides downtown Metropolis. Got Zod in a headlock, and he didn't have any other choice, besides killing him? Come on really? He didn't have the strength to push his head down a few inches? I'm sorry but Superman does not kill. Never ever. Mark Waid, the writer of some of the source material Superman: Birthright, even said that he almost walked out of the movie at that point.

Superman didn't save Pa Kent--- The entire half of the movie you set up the theme of "how would people react to you Clark?" When asked if he should have let the school bus full of children die, Jonathan Kent replies, "maybe"? WOW. Then, later on Clark has every opportunity so save his fricking father but doesn't take it? All because he doesn't want anyone to see what he can do?? And how people would react? Come on people, if you have the ability so save your father from certain death, that trumps any and all other factors. On a separate note, if you want to know what people of earth would think of this "alien", why not actually show their reactions to this news, besides the handful of clichéd military dudes, and a small group of Daily Planet workers? Maybe then would I believe the supposed realness of this movie. After all that is the overlying message Pa Kent is trying to teach Clark. Well he's dead now, so I guess that doesn't really matter.

Man of Steel was a joyless movie--- Not in terms of big battles mind you, that was cool to watch. It's the fact that Superman is a dang person who Is able to fly, super strength and countless other abilities. Why are you so darn depressed all the time? Get over it man! Quit wondering the earth saying "who am I?" In addition there was absolutely no comedic factors in the movie, aside from one lame joke about Superman being HOT! It was all a one note, grey toned feeling of bleakness.

Man of Steel was poorly written/directed --- It's bad when you cast all these wonderful actors and have this awful of a screenplay. Louis Lane was an afterthought of a character, who needed saving the whole movie. And I love Michael Shannon, but in this film, he was pretty over the top. He screams at Lara(Kal-El's mother) over and over again, "I will find your son! I will find him"(as he slowly backs away) and for the fifth time, "I WILL FIND HIM!" Yikes. Also, the story was poorly structured, and the pacing was all off.

The Good:

Special effects were good--- Hardly any slow motion! Thank the heavens! Zach Snyder is known for that! Space stuff, looked well. The flying/ sonic booms effects were pretty awesome.

Action scenes solid--- Yes finally a superman movie where he punches someone! Unfortunately it was straight into a 60 story skyscraper. But again with no emotional tie in to any of theses characters, I cared that much less of the outcome of the battle.

Casting Good --- Henry Cavill did a good job for what he was given. And another surprising highlight was Laurence Fishburn as Perry White. He did a good job not trying to overplay it.

Thanks if you read this and didn't totally hate on me for not liking the movie. It's just one man's opinion on probably their favorite fictional characters ever created.

Thank you!

Avatar image for deaditegonzo
deaditegonzo

4168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@k4tzm4n said:

I honestly think all the "5/5" and "best comic book movie ever" is a reaction to the extremely low reviews it got.

By that logic, why didn't we see a widely positive response from fans to Green Lantern or X-Men Origins: Wolverine when critics panned it? The answer is simple: it's because some people legitimately love this film. I get you didn't and that's perfectly fine, but to think people adore it because of negative reviews has no weight behind it.

And in the off chance this remark also applies to my review: the only score I saw before going into the film was a 9/10 from IGN.

I agree.

I also think it doesnt take into account the fact that the audience reviews are nearly ALL positive. A lot of individuals on here dont realize their opinion is the aberration. With Rotten Tomatoes, we are talking about a little over 100 reviewers, VERSUS 80,000 audience reviews. The opinion that this wasnt a good movie is the minority opinion. And I honestly believe its so prevalent because people truly do want to look superior. The other thing I see, is that the mediocrity of Iron Man 3 has polarized people.

I have seen more claims that this is the best super hero movie ever than I have for any other film, it meant something to a lot of people. We all have opinions of course, and sometimes opinions are so different that two people cannot even comprehend the other person's stance. This seems to be the case here, and of course we all think our opinions are based on greater inspection of the film.

Avatar image for k4tzm4n
k4tzm4n

41857

Forum Posts

9127

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

k4tzm4n  Moderator

@supermansito:

Reeve's wouldn't have killed normally

Not to mention Reeve's killed a POWERLESS Zod then smiled when Lois killed the other one.

Avatar image for supermaansito
supermaansito

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

for ppl that said this is not superman ....

Superman killed Zod in the comics, in fact he outright executed him with Kryptonite, and it had a massive effect on his character, morals etc. He actually vowed not to kill unless 100% necessary afterwoods. Superman killing Zod was completly in character, he was saving not just a family, but the world.

Reeve's wouldn't have killed normally nor would Cavill's, but under those conditions 'Superman' would have done the same. Zod HAD to die to save the world, as said by him himself. The filmmakers didn't betray the character, they were more accurate to modern comics than the Donner films.

Avatar image for supermaansito
supermaansito

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

First and foremost, I really enjoyed the movie. I hope to see it a second time this weekend. Almost everything worked for me. The Jonathan Kent stuff was really great, in fact the representation of the Kents and Jor-El was the best I have seen. I really liked how they did the flashbacks, totally worked. I even liked how Lois was portrayed and I was concerned a bit that I wouldn't. I will wait for this movie to be out a bit more before going more in depth, but I want to in regards to that. I would say the only two things that really jarred me were how Lois meets Kal-El and the end of the battle between Supes and Zod. All in all I give it an 8/10.

Now to address gripes I have read. First I want to address the gripe about tearing down Metropolis. Which was a smaller portion than I think people realize, but this was an Alien invasion and an 8th of Metropolis is better than the whole planet. Not to mention, you are telling me the damage sustained in Metropolis was no worse than the damage to New York in Avengers? I mean, yeah it is unfortunate but when things of that nature happen, stuff gets knocked down. Plus, as Zero Year and Arkham Origins will be depicting, a superhero just starting out doesn't have full reigns and haven't perfected how to be so smooth with their gifts. I would like that to be something he addresses in the movie but it has to be a learning curve. The whole movie was about him choosing between his birth world and the world he was raised on so he wouldn't just instantly be conscious of all the people around him. I am fine with that. Again I point out The Avengers tore through buildings, dropped the huge flying-worms through buildings and such and no one had anything to say about that.

I have also heard people address the movie as cold and perhaps I want to see it too much but I just completely disagree. How the things Jonathan Kent says come back to play in Superman's world fit so well and you could tell started to really shape the kind of man he grew up to be whether he knew it or not, it was beautiful. The struggle between being an absolute outsider, hiding who you really are because other people will judge you, very compelling stuff. Though the last Superman movie that played on these emotions and such was bombed.. so which is it?

I think Superman is a harder character than people may think. It may not be everyone's cup of tea, but it definitely is mine. I can't wait for the sequel. I hope they find ways to better polish things, but this was the first time around the track, it usually takes a warm up to hit full stride and if this was the warm up, then the full stride is going to be amazing.

well said sir

Avatar image for drphilter
drphilter

123

Forum Posts

58

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

First and foremost, I really enjoyed the movie. I hope to see it a second time this weekend. Almost everything worked for me. The Jonathan Kent stuff was really great, in fact the representation of the Kents and Jor-El was the best I have seen. I really liked how they did the flashbacks, totally worked. I even liked how Lois was portrayed and I was concerned a bit that I wouldn't. I will wait for this movie to be out a bit more before going more in depth, but I want to in regards to that. I would say the only two things that really jarred me were how Lois meets Kal-El and the end of the battle between Supes and Zod. All in all I give it an 8/10.

Now to address gripes I have read. First I want to address the gripe about tearing down Metropolis. Which was a smaller portion than I think people realize, but this was an Alien invasion and an 8th of Metropolis is better than the whole planet. Not to mention, you are telling me the damage sustained in Metropolis was no worse than the damage to New York in Avengers? I mean, yeah it is unfortunate but when things of that nature happen, stuff gets knocked down. Plus, as Zero Year and Arkham Origins will be depicting, a superhero just starting out doesn't have full reigns and haven't perfected how to be so smooth with their gifts. I would like that to be something he addresses in the movie but it has to be a learning curve. The whole movie was about him choosing between his birth world and the world he was raised on so he wouldn't just instantly be conscious of all the people around him. I am fine with that. Again I point out The Avengers tore through buildings, dropped the huge flying-worms through buildings and such and no one had anything to say about that.

I have also heard people address the movie as cold and perhaps I want to see it too much but I just completely disagree. How the things Jonathan Kent says come back to play in Superman's world fit so well and you could tell started to really shape the kind of man he grew up to be whether he knew it or not, it was beautiful. The struggle between being an absolute outsider, hiding who you really are because other people will judge you, very compelling stuff. Though the last Superman movie that played on these emotions and such was bombed.. so which is it?

I think Superman is a harder character than people may think. It may not be everyone's cup of tea, but it definitely is mine. I can't wait for the sequel. I hope they find ways to better polish things, but this was the first time around the track, it usually takes a warm up to hit full stride and if this was the warm up, then the full stride is going to be amazing.

Avatar image for azura_thena
Azura_Thena

140

Forum Posts

4

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By Azura_Thena

@angelo2113: i just feel that instead of putting that part (which shows from that point on that he is willing to kill) they should have given superman a part that showed mercy one that didn't make him a murder because honestly his moral compose in comparison to the superman we know and love was so questionable in the movie from everything like LETTING HIS DAD DIE, to his disregard to collateral damage something he always considers to his lack of saving anyone that is not named Lois lane, and lastly although funny destroying a mans lively hood for being a drunken idiot. btw i don't mean to argue just really what to get that off my chest i also respect your opinion. :)

Which Superman are you talking about when you say the one you know and love? I ask because it doesn't seem like any Superman I have read.

Avatar image for k4tzm4n
k4tzm4n

41857

Forum Posts

9127

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 1

Edited By k4tzm4n  Moderator

I honestly think all the "5/5" and "best comic book movie ever" is a reaction to the extremely low reviews it got.

By that logic, why didn't we see a widely positive response from fans to Green Lantern or X-Men Origins: Wolverine when critics panned it? The answer is simple: it's because some people legitimately love this film. I get you didn't and that's perfectly fine, but to think people adore it because of negative reviews has no weight behind it.

And in the off chance this remark also applies to my review: the only score I saw before going into the film was a 9/10 from IGN.

Avatar image for crimaldan
CrimAldan

26

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

With the exception of some Batman, I grew up primarily a Marvel fanboy (i.e. Spiderman, The Avengers, and X-men). But, after seeing Man of Steel, I can honestly say the man with the S on his chest is one of my favorites now! I hope this trilogy of Superman films will beat out The Dark Knight Trilogy!

Avatar image for fkk1984
fkk1984

30

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 6

I saw the movie on Thursday, absolutely amazing!

I’m not a Superman fan, still I’m a comic books reader since I’m 8. I can’t make a comic/movie comparison as I did with Batman and Marvel films, but from a comic fan optic, I can assure the movie is awesome in every aspect (plot, characters, scenes, FX, esthetic). Nolan’s hand is evident. Hope Superman fans like it too!

Adios.

Avatar image for novi_homines
novi_homines

1468

Forum Posts

853

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rich711 said:

Saw it last night. This is my rating adjusted for whatever type of audience member you are.

Hysterical fan-boys that have lost all perspective and 8 year olds who think the last movie they saw is the greatest movie ever - 5/5

Everyone that loves D.C. Comic - 3.5/5

Non-comic book readers - 3/5

I so much agree with your assessment on this. Over-all it was still a good movie and worth your time and money.

I agree with this as well. I honestly think all the "5/5" and "best comic book movie ever" is a reaction to the extremely low reviews it got. I admit, it doesn't deserve a rotten on RT, but it certainly was not a 5 star film. At least not in my opinion.

Avatar image for rich711
Rich711

264

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 1

Edited By Rich711

@shallbecomeabattoo: Where did I say anything about Batman Returns? I certainly didnt give it 5/5 if I misspoke I meant the 1st and 2nd Christian Bale Batman. Either way, who cares, you are obviously a spastic fanboy. You said yourself, the movie isnt released in your country until next week, so you havent even seen the movie. LOL! So go back to kicking a soccer ball around in the dirt. And next week when it comes to your country you can face the fact that this movie is not very good. ...but I am sure being a fanboy you will insist it is the greatest superhero movie of all time.

The more time passes from that movie the more I realize just how mediocre of a movie it was. Days after Iron Man Avengers and Dark Knight I was itching to find someone who hadnt seen it so I could go again. Someone just asked me if I wanted to go see Man of Steel and I just groaned and said I rather see "The End" than sit through MoS again.

Avatar image for novi_homines
novi_homines

1468

Forum Posts

853

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By novi_homines

@supermansito:

Also, if you go back to the first 4 pages, and see other people's review, I was actually the first one to give it the highest score at that point, 7/10. Including dc fans, almost every one was a 3/5. Many of their reviews as well were negative, but I guess since my profile pic is spiderman, I am a troll. lol

Avatar image for redbird3rdboywonder
redbird3rdboywonder

7158

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

To those complaining about character development, honestly you can tell that Synder felt like you should know who Perry, Lois and the Daily Planet cast are by now, I mean they're his main supporting cast and you've seen them countless times in different forms, whether in the previous movies, or the shows like Lois and Clark you should know and thus he felt like no explanation was needed which I'm glad he didn't waste time on anyway. Now the pacing was a bit fast but had it been slower they'd have felt drawn out honestly anyway I love this movie

Avatar image for lilben42
lilben42

2702

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@cyborg6971: Yeah! He isn't the superman we all know and love yet but by the second movie he probably will be. I really hope Zack Snyder looks at the reviews and changes some stuff because Man of Steel was good but it could use better pacing and character development.

Avatar image for novi_homines
novi_homines

1468

Forum Posts

853

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By novi_homines

@supermansito said:

@novi_homines: marvel fan detected.....everything you said about this movie is negative just dont see it and let the vine ppl enjoy it like i did

@deaditegonzo: man i think... that Novi _homines is trolling yo u srs......

And here comes the, "negative reaction? troll." response. Going off of this logic, there are millions of people who are trolls. Alot of people disliked the film, alot liked the film.

Of course i'm a marvel fan. But that doesn't mean I'm not a dc fan as well. And you being a superman fan doesn't automatically make me think that you're a blind fanboy. Just try to be level headed, trolls really don't exist on comicvine. At least not in my knowledge.

Avatar image for veshark
Veshark

10499

Forum Posts

15829

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Veshark

For ppl talking about character development, what the hell did Avengers have? Don't give me that crap about separate movies being necessary for development, because then the Avengers failed as a standalone movie. Also, Loki is a shitty villain who acted like a little bitch in avengers and didn't do anything but kill off the tacked on spinoff character.

Supes killing Zod is based off of the comics.

And for idiots too who are ignorant enough to think that killing a murderous wicked madman is murder itself, you are stupid as hell.

Whoo jeez, calm down, friend. I agree with your points but there's really no need for name-calling (let alone swearing).

Avatar image for jointron33
jointron33

2107

Forum Posts

69

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 12

For ppl talking about character development, what the hell did Avengers have? Don't give me that crap about separate movies being necessary for development, because then the Avengers failed as a standalone movie. Also, Loki is a shitty villain who acted like a little bitch in avengers and didn't do anything but kill off the tacked on spinoff character.

Supes killing Zod is based off of the comics.

And for idiots too who are ignorant enough to think that killing a murderous wicked madman is murder itself, you are stupid as hell.

Avatar image for cloudzackvincent
cloudzackvincent

1197

Forum Posts

1318

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

To everyone complaining about Superman killing Zod... ... it was very well played out... and i bet u guys didn't have a problem when Captain America was throwing people off the hellcarrier and shooting at them with an assault rifle in the Avengers.

Avatar image for cyborg6971
Cyborg6971

204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Loved it all of it I have no problem with the end cause this act will shape Kal into what we know. This is after all a reboot of superman not another sequel to the donner films. And didn't the ending happen already in the comics?

Avatar image for iceprince_x
IcePrince_X

5211

Forum Posts

628

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rich711 said:

Saw it last night. This is my rating adjusted for whatever type of audience member you are.

Hysterical fan-boys that have lost all perspective and 8 year olds who think the last movie they saw is the greatest movie ever - 5/5

Everyone that loves D.C. Comic - 3.5/5

Non-comic book readers - 3/5

I so much agree with your assessment on this. Over-all it was still a good movie and worth your time and money.

Avatar image for supermaansito
supermaansito

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

@novi_homines: marvel fan detected.....everything you said about this movie is negative just dont see it and let the vine ppl enjoy it like i did

@deaditegonzo: man i think... that Novi _homines is trolling yo u srs......

Avatar image for momo111191
momo111191

262

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@angelo2113: i just feel that instead of putting that part (which shows from that point on that he is willing to kill) they should have given superman a part that showed mercy one that didn't make him a murder because honestly his moral compose in comparison to the superman we know and love was so questionable in the movie from everything like LETTING HIS DAD DIE, to his disregard to collateral damage something he always considers to his lack of saving anyone that is not named Lois lane, and lastly although funny destroying a mans lively hood for being a drunken idiot. btw i don't mean to argue just really what to get that off my chest i also respect your opinion. :)

Avatar image for deactivated-5c9535a734784
deactivated-5c9535a734784

2578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

I saw it yesterday and was complelty blown away. The entire qas epic. The word epic get's thrown abput a lot today. But man of steel was the definition of epic. The actors all played there rolls well and Cavil made an awesome superman. Definatly going again. Can't understand why critics have said its bad. Ah well don't listen to them anyway. lol

Avatar image for shallbecomeabattoo
Shallbecomeabattoo

369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rich711: I am sorry, but someone who names Batman Returns as one of his 5/5 movies, clearly has a VASTLY different taste then me (and I think most of us around here. I mean... Batman Returns? Come on! That movie is on the same level as Forever and B&R! I mean 1/5 horrible! Each their own taste, but I NEVER heard that someone liked, let alone loved, Returns. Such a bad bad movie), so I think MoS will be great for me.

Avatar image for angelo2113
Angelo2113

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

nooooo just nooooo the fights 10/10 the movie 6/10 as a hard core die hard fan this movie pissed me of especially when superman killed zod i was sick to my stomach am i the only won who loves that fact that superman would never ever kill. what's wrong with Hollywood and people that they cant appreciate his never compromising beliefs instead they want it to be edgy and cool instead of right.

I understand where you're coming from and respect that's how you view Superman but I felt what he did was purely just. During that part of Zod's characterization, he was just as dangerous as Doomsday if not more. Superman begged Zod to stand down but his response was "Never!" Superman did what he had to do because there was no other option.

Avatar image for mega_spidey01
Mega_spidey01

3080

Forum Posts

5

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Mega_spidey01

the best superman movie great action, story, special effects and amy adams is pretty damm hot ! bring the sequel !

Avatar image for angelo2113
Angelo2113

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This movie is a 10/10 and honestly the best superhero film ive ever seen. Its also one of the best movies ive ever seen period. I went with two non-comic book fans and a fellow comic book fan. 3 of us out 4 agreed it was the best superhero film weve ever seen (one of the non-fans, myself and the other fan), the other person with us still really enjoyed it and wanted to see it again, but didnt love it quite as much. She did like it a lot better than Iron Man 3. Its also worth noting that I was literally the only person in my group who likes Superman/ sees himself as a Superman fan.

I find it interesting that a good deal of the "positive" reviewers, and a BUNCH of the audience have agreed on this point and even stated it directly, that it is the best superhero film yet. That stands out to me, its even apparent throughout these comments. It makes me think both the negative reviewers, and negative audience reviews on here, stem from a foolish attempt at being "high minded" and seeming superior to what said people see as the unwashed masses of movie viewers. If you let such a desire for superiority ruin an enjoyable experience, then youre really only hurting yourself, and no normal will really give a damn what you have to say... And frankly you seem all the more foolish to me.

I think this movie balanced everything so well, that it is almost a rorschach test for its audience. If you really are just in it for the action, then you will be 100% satisfied, its the best action ever offered up in a superhero film, EVER. If you are someone who likes to really dissect and stew on a film, you will be offered great depth, character and emotion, to your hearts content, and also leave happy. Basically, the only people who will leave unhappy are the people who are just smart enough to think theyre above mindless action, but not quite smart enough to actually fully explore the movie and its subtleties (a category where most reviewers fall I fear).

I liked this better than the entire Dark Knight Trilogy, which I originally saw as the bench mark. It utterly annihilates every offering that Marvel has offered up so far.

Is it a pure art-house film? No, it sure isnt. But ive never even bothered to see the Artist, the King's Speech, or Argo (the winners of the Oscar for best picture for the last 3 years). Why? Because regardless of how intellectually stimulating they may be, they all looked boring, and I am definitely not trying that hard to seem smart. This made me think, it made me feel, it blew my mind with its gusto, I had the chills more than I ever have had in a film, to me, its value is far greater than any of those movies that the critics raved about.

This made me want to get out of my chair and start applauding. Absolutely wonderful aspect and expression that I 100% completely agree with. Everybody has their own mindset but I've been a Superman fan for as long as I can remember while reading back to really late Golden Age and early Silver Age and I thought this was the perfect super hero movie ever made. I absolutely love The Dark Knight Trilogy and have really liked most of the Avengers line but Man of Steel made me feel that I have never truly seen a super hero movie until now.

Avatar image for caananwhite
caananwhite

2

Forum Posts

24

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By caananwhite

This film was breathtakingly amazing. Hands down.

Avatar image for novi_homines
novi_homines

1468

Forum Posts

853

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@stormbox said:

@novi_homines: Funny, i did the exact same thing (rewatching it in 3d) and i ended up liking it even more. I honestly dont see what's wrong with the film's structure, it works perfectly for me.

And metropolis wasnt completely destroyed, people are seriously blowing that final scene out of proportion, i'd say there's a "ground zero" zone in metropolis and that's it, when superman and zod take their fight elsewhere the rest of city looks perfectly fine. And its a big city.

You're right about it not being completely destroyed. Lol, but still, that destruction was shocking.

Avatar image for novi_homines
novi_homines

1468

Forum Posts

853

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By novi_homines

Comic book writer Brian Michael Bendis on Man of Steel. Some hilarious stuff. I point them out within the text.

Many of you have asked me for my review but every time I voice an opinion about anything DC that isn’t gloriously positive I get accused of being some Marvel comics shill. some of you think there’s some Marvel comics shadow Council that calls me up and tells me what to say to my 85,000 twitter followers or that I have an invested interest in them failing.

that kind of thinking is nuts. I have presented hundreds if not thousands of beautiful DC comics related imagery right here and every time I read a good DC comic, or any comic from any company, I tell everyone.

I love comics and I love these characters and I don’t care where the good stuff comes from as long as there’s good stuff.

SPOILERS!

man of steel, I am very sorry to say, is not good stuff.

I was there at midnight with my friends and my wife ready to love it. but as soon as Russell Crowe yells out for his flying Dragon/ horse like Roy Rogers yelling for trigger I was, like, uh oh.

the movie is incredibly well cast. I really admired the structure of the screenplay. they tried something new there and big thumbs up for that.

but the story and battles start so big that it has nowhere to go but into this 9/11 disaster territory and those final moments between the hero and villain which were the opposite of heroic. I thought the whole last half of the movie was a huge mistake.

you basically had Superman save the world but not without causing a worse than 9/11 disaster, make out with his girlfriend in the middle of it, and then murder the bad guy in front of children. wow. I joked online that at the end of the story Superman had saved all of Metropolis a total of $35 in damage from what zod was aiming to do.

as i said on twitter- The reason there is no after credits teaser at the end of Man of steel is because Superman accidentally destroyed it in the fight scene :-) (LMAO!!)

the character stuff is where my heart is always at and the morality lessons that Clark was being taught were so muddy. the fact that they kept having to return to them to be explained AGAIN is a sign that something wasn’t working. in the first Superman movie, the father-son stuff was so elegant. to the point. centered.

I thought the choice of the muted tones was ill-conceived. some accuse Warner Bros. of being embarrassed about their superheroes and it’s that kind of choices that make me think that there’s something to that. everything was so gray and blue. the special effects were blurry and zoomed by as if they were trying to cover up some bad figure work.

I kept thinking about that scene in Steve Martin’s the jerk where an assassin is trying to kill him and keep hitting the oil cans. Steve Martin yells out: he hates these cans!!

I felt the same way about Superman and buildings :-) he hates these buildings!! (< LOL!!!)

so better luck next time. I really would love a Justice league movie!! bring it on!

PS. a couple of you are now going to be filled with the urge to attack me and my work for not liking this movie. many people asked me for my opinion and I gave it. if you don’t agree with me that’s fine. I paid money and I get to have an opinion.

Source.

Avatar image for stormbox
Stormbox

2055

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

@novi_homines: Funny, i did the exact same thing (rewatching it in 3d) and i ended up liking it even more. I honestly dont see what's wrong with the film's structure, it works perfectly for me.

And metropolis wasnt completely destroyed, people are seriously blowing that final scene out of proportion, i'd say there's a "ground zero" zone in metropolis and that's it, when superman and zod take their fight elsewhere the rest of city looks perfectly fine. And its a big city.

Avatar image for knightofsteel
KnightofSteel

369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By KnightofSteel

Just got back from seeing it and I think I had a smile on my face the whole way home. Finally a Superman movie done right, this movie was absolutely brilliant and I loved every second of it. Sure The Avengers was an amazing superhero movie with all the right ingredients, but Man of Steel not only had all that but also had emotion. Clark's relationship with his dad was beautifully played out. And the chemistry between Lois and Clark was well done. Cavill portrayed Superman very well I thought, and nice to see a Superman with a physique that fills the outfit. And bravo to Michael Shannon for his tremendous performance as Zod. I'm a big Batman fan and I never thought another superhero film would surpass my love for Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, but Man of Steel tops them all.

Avatar image for novi_homines
novi_homines

1468

Forum Posts

853

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By novi_homines

@deaditegonzo: You may be right. Crowd energy can be a powerful thing.

Avatar image for deaditegonzo
deaditegonzo

4168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By deaditegonzo

@deaditegonzo said:

@novi_homines:

Thats weird, literally everyone in my theater started clapping at the end. I am tempted to make a sarcastic remark about you living in Portland or Seattle jk.

But seriously, the entire theater applauded, I cannot say ive ever seen that before, not even at Avengers or Dark Knight.

Lol I live in chicago.

And yeah, i've seen that plenty of times. There was a standing ovation at the end of The Avengers film. In this film, a few people tried to start an applause, but it didn't work, no on joined in. I found that to be interesting. Though, like I said, some seem to love it, others seem to hate it. Its very polarizing.

I live in a small city, one where hype, crowd energy, excitement all seem to be completely foreign concepts. We dont even really get concerts here or anything. It was truly a wonder to see one movie shake so many people out of the shell of apathy they seemed to have built up, and really energize the whole audience.

I, myself at the end, had all sorts of energy and excitement for the film, and had no idea how to express myself, if row after row hadnt started applauding, I may have exploded. I feel that, as an audience, we all must have shared that powerful energy and need for release. I dont know.

Avatar image for novi_homines
novi_homines

1468

Forum Posts

853

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By novi_homines

@deaditegonzo said:

@novi_homines:

Thats weird, literally everyone in my theater started clapping at the end. I am tempted to make a sarcastic remark about you living in Portland or Seattle jk.

But seriously, the entire theater applauded, I cannot say ive ever seen that before, not even at Avengers or Dark Knight.

Lol I live in chicago.

And yeah, i've seen that plenty of times. There was a standing ovation at the end of The Avengers film. Don't remember if it was at TDK, and there wasn't at the end of TDKR. In this film, a few people tried to start an applause, but it didn't work, no one joined in. I found that to be interesting. But like I said, some seem to love it, others seem to hate it. Its very polarizing.

Avatar image for deaditegonzo
deaditegonzo

4168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By deaditegonzo

@novi_homines:

Thats weird, literally everyone in my theater started clapping at the end. I am tempted to make a sarcastic remark about you living in Portland or Seattle jk.

But seriously, the entire theater applauded, I cannot say ive ever seen that before, not even at Avengers or Dark Knight.

Avatar image for _genesis_
_Genesis_

328

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Saw it in midnight release and all I have to say is WOW! That movie was incredible. Action packed and was a blast from start to finish. THAT'S how you make a Superman movie! Honestly I'm going to go see it again later.

Avatar image for novi_homines
novi_homines

1468

Forum Posts

853

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By novi_homines

Also, this time around I took the liberty of asking alot of people what their first impressions were, as they were walking out of the theater. Wanted to get a feel for what the people thought, and thought it would be cool to share with ComicVine. =)

- As soon as I got out of the theater, I heard these two ladies talking about Man of Steel, and I asked one what she thought (seemed over 35). She said "I didn't like it". I said "wow, why?". "I don't know, it was just all over the place". I don't remember the exact words after this, but she mentioned the flashbacks, and how they weren't done right. She also touched on the action.

- I saw a guy sitting on the bench outside of the theater room and I asked him what he thought (he seemed mid to late 20s). He said, 'I didn't really like it". I asked why and he used one word that I remember very well because it perfectly described the issues of the script, "It was very choppy." He said he liked the moments in the flashbacks, but he then went on again to reiterate that the movie still felt "choppy".

- I saw a young guy on the escalator on my way out (around 19), and asked what he thought. He said he "hated it". I asked him why, he just went on to say something along the lines of not knowing why, but just knowing that he hated it. What looked to by his dad noticed our conversation and looked over, I asked him, and he said he really didn't care for it. But in the nonchalant way he responded, in combination with his age, made me think it was more of him simply not being a comic book movie fan. And didn't care for it because of that, rather than the actual quality of the movie.

- Last but not least, I saw a group of about 5 older guys who looked to be about mid 20s, talking about the film. I went there and asked their opinions, and one guy came out first and said, "I thought it was great, I like what they did with the film, the action was amazing, and I really liked it. Now you gotta talk to THESE guys". The way he came out first, and responded, was clear to me that everyone else in the group was disagreeing with him, and he couldn't believe they didn't like it. A few of them mentioned the plot, and the quality of it. Others in the group mentioned the destruction, and how "the world was completely destroyed in this film" (this line made me laugh). 2 of them didn't dislike it as much as the other two, but were just pretty meh about it. One of them brought up a good point, the trilogy is screwed action wise. He talked about how bad of a choice it was for wb/dc to choose to go this big in the first film. He talked about the fact that it'll be hard to top this film action wise, and how that puts the rest of the trilogy in a tough position.

That's all I got. I hope you got the feeling people had in my nearby theater. They are by no means a representation of a larger group. These are simply people with their own opinions. I hoped you appreciate the feedback I got from the limited amount of people I spoke to, and I hope you appreciate me typing up my feedback for you. Go out and see the movie, its DEFINITELY worth a watch, even if for the action alone. And since this is the start of the DC live action universe, you DON'T want to miss out! =)

Avatar image for supermaansito
supermaansito

207

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

This movie is a 10/10 and honestly the best superhero film ive ever seen. Its also one of the best movies ive ever seen period. I went with two non-comic book fans and a fellow comic book fan. 3 of us out 4 agreed it was the best superhero film weve ever seen (one of the non-fans, myself and the other fan), the other person with us still really enjoyed it and wanted to see it again, but didnt love it quite as much. She did like it a lot better than Iron Man 3. Its also worth noting that I was literally the only person in my group who likes Superman/ sees himself as a Superman fan.

I find it interesting that a good deal of the "positive" reviewers, and a BUNCH of the audience have agreed on this point and even stated it directly, that it is the best superhero film yet. That stands out to me, its even apparent throughout these comments. It makes me think both the negative reviewers, and negative audience reviews on here, stem from a foolish attempt at being "high minded" and seeming superior to what said people see as the unwashed masses of movie viewers. If you let such a desire for superiority ruin an enjoyable experience, then youre really only hurting yourself, and no normal will really give a damn what you have to say... And frankly you seem all the more foolish to me.

I think this movie balanced everything so well, that it is almost a rorschach test for its audience. If you really are just in it for the action, then you will be 100% satisfied, its the best action ever offered up in a superhero film, EVER. If you are someone who likes to really dissect and stew on a film, you will be offered great depth, character and emotion, to your hearts content, and also leave happy. Basically, the only people who will leave unhappy are the people who are just smart enough to think theyre above mindless action, but not quite smart enough to actually fully explore the movie and its subtleties (a category where most reviewers fall I fear).

I liked this better than the entire Dark Knight Trilogy, which I originally saw as the bench mark. It utterly annihilates every offering that Marvel has offered up so far.

Is it a pure art-house film? No, it sure isnt. But ive never even bothered to see the Artist, the King's Speech, or Argo (the winners of the Oscar for best picture for the last 3 years). Why? Because regardless of how intellectually stimulating they may be, they all looked boring, and I am definitely not trying that hard to seem smart. This made me think, it made me feel, it blew my mind with its gusto, I had the chills more than I ever have had in a film, to me, its value is far greater than any of those movies that the critics raved about.

wow well said sir!!!

Avatar image for momo111191
momo111191

262

Forum Posts

1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

nooooo just nooooo the fights 10/10 the movie 6/10 as a hard core die hard fan this movie pissed me of especially when superman killed zod i was sick to my stomach am i the only won who loves that fact that superman would never ever kill. what's wrong with Hollywood and people that they cant appreciate his never compromising beliefs instead they want it to be edgy and cool instead of right.

Avatar image for deaditegonzo
deaditegonzo

4168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

This movie is a 10/10 and honestly the best superhero film ive ever seen. Its also one of the best movies ive ever seen period. I went with two non-comic book fans and a fellow comic book fan. 3 of us out 4 agreed it was the best superhero film weve ever seen (one of the non-fans, myself and the other fan), the other person with us still really enjoyed it and wanted to see it again, but didnt love it quite as much. She did like it a lot better than Iron Man 3. Its also worth noting that I was literally the only person in my group who likes Superman/ sees himself as a Superman fan.

I find it interesting that a good deal of the "positive" reviewers, and a BUNCH of the audience have agreed on this point and even stated it directly, that it is the best superhero film yet. That stands out to me, its even apparent throughout these comments. It makes me think both the negative reviewers, and negative audience reviews on here, stem from a foolish attempt at being "high minded" and seeming superior to what said people see as the unwashed masses of movie viewers. If you let such a desire for superiority ruin an enjoyable experience, then youre really only hurting yourself, and no normal will really give a damn what you have to say... And frankly you seem all the more foolish to me.

I think this movie balanced everything so well, that it is almost a rorschach test for its audience. If you really are just in it for the action, then you will be 100% satisfied, its the best action ever offered up in a superhero film, EVER. If you are someone who likes to really dissect and stew on a film, you will be offered great depth, character and emotion, to your hearts content, and also leave happy. Basically, the only people who will leave unhappy are the people who are just smart enough to think theyre above mindless action, but not quite smart enough to actually fully explore the movie and its subtleties (a category where most reviewers fall I fear).

I liked this better than the entire Dark Knight Trilogy, which I originally saw as the bench mark. It utterly annihilates every offering that Marvel has offered up so far.

Is it a pure art-house film? No, it sure isnt. But ive never even bothered to see the Artist, the King's Speech, or Argo (the winners of the Oscar for best picture for the last 3 years). Why? Because regardless of how intellectually stimulating they may be, they all looked boring, and I am definitely not trying that hard to seem smart. This made me think, it made me feel, it blew my mind with its gusto, I had the chills more than I ever have had in a film, to me, its value is far greater than any of those movies that the critics raved about.

Avatar image for novi_homines
novi_homines

1468

Forum Posts

853

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By novi_homines

Okay, I went to see it again tonight, this time in 3D, and I want to give a follow up impression to my lengthy first one (found somewhere on the first page). After watching it for a second time, I feel I can judge the film a lot better.

My thoughts after seeing it twice -

- First of all, I can confirm that 3d is useless. Outside of the first 30-45 mins, I forgot I was watching it in 3d.

- Instead of liking the movie more the second time, I actually liked it less. I'll stick with the 7/10 that I gave to it, but if I had felt this way the first time around, I wouldn't have given it anything higher than a 6.5, and the following is why I feel this way.

- Watching it the second time, the films structure was definitely choppy and simply bad overall. Its one thing to have different aged flashbacks to tell how he grew up, but its another thing entirely to have the supposed "present time" lack a continuous flow as well. When you have "present" clark jumping from fisherman, to bartender, to anthropologist, in combination with the flashbacks, topped off with these flashbacks being out of continuity as well (in age), you simply have a train-wreck of a story. Jonathan shouldn't be dead in one scene, and still be in a flashback in a later scene giving him more advice. And the sad part is, these were only the problems of the first half of the movie.

- The second half can simply be renamed as a hybrid of transformers / a dragon ball z episode. It's like transformers in the amount of explosions and building collapses (counted it this time, total of 7 buildings collapsed in this film). And it is like DBZ when it came to the brawls. At one point I felt I could've just been watching an extremely high budget cg film, similar to the Deathstroke Arkham Origins trailer. It seemed like there was more apparent cg in the brawls of the last hour of this film, than there were in every other cbm film ever made, combined. That most likely isn't true, but it definitely felt like it. Without a doubt there's more cg in this than in Avengers. And any film in the IM trilogy, TDK trilogy, and even spiderman trilogy. I felt that there was an entire 4 minute stretch in the superman vs zod battle, that was just PURE cg.

And another thing that annoyed me was pointless explosions and destruction. They completely destroyed all of metropolis. I still can't figure out for the life of me why superman continued to fight in populated places. One of the contributing reasons as to why it doesn't feel like a true superman movie. The real superman would go to deserted areas, and not put so many people in danger. Fight with zod in the CENTER of metropolis? What was he thinking? Same thing with Faora and that henchmen in that small town. Careless and complete disregard for collateral damage.

- I liked Cavill as superman ALOT better this time around. He just wasn't given a good enough script to properly act the part.

Now for some slight nitpicks.

- How in the world do the lights go off but not the tvs, when zod makes his message to earth? Tvs use electricity as well. I feel that was a cheap way to create a dramatic effect. And after he finished, the lights came back on, and a lightbulb busted in the Kent living room. lol wow.

- Why is lois such a damsel in distress? Superman must have saved her from death about 4 times in this film. Lol

- Overall, the first half of the film was the best parts of it, but it was horribly structured. The second half of the film was simply a huge, over the top, action movie. Both of these halves combine to make an average cbm in my opinion. But this is by no means a fact. Some people will love it and say its great, others won't. Everyone has their own opinions. And i've told you the reasons why I have mine.

Avatar image for sethysquare
sethysquare

3965

Forum Posts

150

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 1

Edited By sethysquare

I like Faora/Col Hardy tension.

Avatar image for flashknight
FlashKnight

736

Forum Posts

262

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 19

Edited By FlashKnight

This film was absolutely amazing. Anyone who thinks otherwise is clueless (looking at you, Rotten Tomatoes).