Just wondering what people thought about the Punisher's brand of justice? Do you agree with it or think Batman's way is better?

No one has the right to take another person's life unless it is an extreme case of self defense(in which their own/child's life is at stake)

Its absolutely right, Punisher takes guys off the streets permanently. Batman puts them behind bars so they can just brake out and kill, rape, maim, and rob again.

I dunno, i was supportive of  Punisher's killings, but then i watched the film where he shoots an undercover cop, and it made me think that Punisher is taking the risk of killing an innocent person alot of the time
Yes people should be punished, sometimes to the extreme, but as soon as Punisher accidently kills an innocent person, he is no better than the criminals he is slaughtering

It annoys me when people say that Batman should kill the criminals. It's not his responsibility to do so, it's the Courts, but so long as they remain entirely useless, then the Punisher's route is the right one.

I like the Punisher as a character and I like reading his stories, but in my opinion...
No, Punisher is wrong. He's a serial killer that should be locked away somewhere he could never get out.  That's part of who he is as a character.
 
You cannot place yourself as judge, jury and executioner. That criminals escape is not the fault of a hero, it's the fault of the system not doing it's job. And it's the fault of bad writing using PIS by making the people who run the prisons in comics to be total idiots. If the writers wrote their prison personnel and law enforcement agents in an intelligent manner, then a lot of stuff that happens in comic would never have. 
 
But no, Punisher is definitively wrong.

I have a Batman view on Super heroism no killing no matter what

" @Crom-Cruach: Totally agree.  Now on the subject of the court system, is it all plot induced stupidity? Comic books usually reflect the trends of the world outside the covers. In real life, criminals do certainly get out of jail, and some go back to their old ways. Is the fact that the same thing happens in comics bad writing or more or less the writers trying to make a statement on the system in general? Now I won't deny, some of the things that happen in comics really is PIS and unrealistic, but hey writer's aren't all perfect. Regardless, the question still stands. "

I think the Punisher is right.  Sometimes scum bags just need to be taken out of the equation once and for all.  The law system is so full of bureaucratic red tape and corruption that you need someone acting outside of the system like Punisher does.  Though he's still killing folks, and he's just as guilty as the people he deals with.

I don't think you can use real life morals to compare to comic book morals of fictional characters.
 
Both Batman and Punisher's styles are wrong when viewed by real life justice and legal system. Vigilantism isn't a valid legal means and both of them (and almost all super-heroes) break real world laws. The comic book worlds/universes operate on a different moral system, so you have to view their actions within that world and not to our real life world.
 
When viewed through DCU, Batman is a good guy and would be considered doing the "right thing."
 
When viewed through Marvel 616, Punisher is a anti-hero (aka bad guy) and would be considered doing the "wrong thing." However, since he mostly kills villains, other heroes and police mostly overlook his actions even though they know Punisher is wrong.

" well you have to understans the mythos and reason of there brands of justice,punisher is best explained as a character in the max series (preferbly garth ennis). Now I'm not a huge batman fan,but I am a huge HUGE punisher fan and the punisher operates on a very black and white justice system,but in my opinion franks methods are necessary but still wrong. "

Morally gray, in the extreme.

He should aim more to people above the law like corrupt politicians instead of those scumbags

Punisher is right. 
 
If Batman had killed The Joker in his first appearance, literally thousands of lives would have been saved.

" Punisher is right.   If Batman had killed The Joker in his first appearance, literally thousands of lives would have been saved. "

i think sometimes i wish batman could kill criminals sometime to but , i dont want people to think he is one of them , after joson todd many heroes would just kill the joker but batman didnt that is willpower there

" @InnerVenom123 said:

" Punisher is right.   If Batman had killed The Joker in his first appearance, literally thousands of lives would have been saved. "

But the greatest human being that's ever lived would be completely corrupted, and millions would have died. "

" @FadeToBlackBolt said:

" @InnerVenom123 said:

" Punisher is right.   If Batman had killed The Joker in his first appearance, literally thousands of lives would have been saved. "

But the greatest human being that's ever lived would be completely corrupted, and millions would have died. "

Millions of bad people dead. Good riddance. "

 Frank is not fighting for justice or for what is right or wrong, he just kills the bad guys. With that there will be results: those whom the bad guys hurt are avenged and those that will be hurt are protected. He just punishes the corrupt.

I agree with Punisher's way to deliver justice. The system is too corrupt. I don't remember the last time supervillain got executed. They just throw them to prisons, and they immediately escape. Or cut the deal with the system and get released by giving information on the inmates or working in black ops teams like Suicide Squad.
So we need the men like Punisher or Rorshach to deal with the monsters permanently. "Criminals get locked up. Dogs get put down".

I think Punisher is right but not everyone should get the same punishment. For example murder and robbery don't equate the same punishment.

batman is a real dandy if you ask me
 
everyone who defends him is a pretentious, tree-hugging, vegan.... enjoy driving your hybrid car at 40km/h

Punisher's justice is the way.