xMattxxrT

This user has not updated recently.

28 2 2 3
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

xMattxxrT's forum posts

  • 19 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for xmattxxrt
xMattxxrT

28

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By xMattxxrT

thanks guys, it's just atm theres no depth in character, every issue they find a new mutant and try recruit him EVERY ISSUE!!! im still gonna read them because they are fun to read every now and again 
but ive never been glued to an issue and annoyed when its ended or HAD to read the next issue, but ill take your ideas and grab some of these issues :p 

Avatar image for xmattxxrt
xMattxxrT

28

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By xMattxxrT

I've been reading the original 1960's X men comics and they are pretty dull, theres nothing too them, is there a point in reading them? or should i move to the 70's ?

Avatar image for xmattxxrt
xMattxxrT

28

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By xMattxxrT

It's just they have an origin maybe several to choose from and yet it's obvious they have employed someone to write an original origin? why bother, they could have spent the money on something else. But i do have to credit them, good job on making the rainbow bridge not as F&CKING CAMP as the comics :D

Avatar image for xmattxxrt
xMattxxrT

28

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By xMattxxrT

I understand that there needs to be one origin movie to kick start it but almost every one that comes out now is an origin! The Hulks had 2, X-men are just about to release their third, Spidermans being rebooted along with FF, Batman's got 2 and superman's also in for his 3rd. I wouldn't mind but they f@ck up the origins so bad sometimes it's laughable, X men first class is going to be showing about 5 origins! of characters one being mystique, the whole idea around mystique is that she is MYSTIQUE, not much is supposed to be known about her. Don't do a Tim Burton on us and give sh!tty made up origins to mysterious characters (Mad Hatter and Willy Wonka). What does anyone else think?

Avatar image for xmattxxrt
xMattxxrT

28

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By xMattxxrT

ahh so it was the avengers script in the case in pulp fiction! I get it now :D

Avatar image for xmattxxrt
xMattxxrT

28

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By xMattxxrT
@Deadcool:  I'm with you on this, i fully agree with this point of view
Avatar image for xmattxxrt
xMattxxrT

28

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By xMattxxrT

True True, i do belive it's an aweful idea, and after this discussion i have come to respect thier dissision more for changing the origin, it's still a very good movie and you US guy's will have a blast on the 6th :D

Avatar image for xmattxxrt
xMattxxrT

28

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By xMattxxrT

when i mean changes this is what i mean...
Spiderman is peter parker
Hulk is bruce banner
Captain America is steve rodgers
they didnt change who they are but with Thor he is never actually donald blake, see what i mean? thats the main issue

Avatar image for xmattxxrt
xMattxxrT

28

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By xMattxxrT

they could have just twisted it to have to frost giants replace the invaders from Saturn, that would have made it similar, i fully agree with you, i loved the movie but i reread the earlier comics to refresh me but it just disappointed me, still it's the best marvel flick in years...in my opinion

Avatar image for xmattxxrt
xMattxxrT

28

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

3

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By xMattxxrT

I know this might seem picky and i understand why they made the changes they did but some just didn't make sense, from a comic point of view.
The main problem is the origin, it didn't follow the origin that stan wrote. Donald Blake, who's a lame medical physicist ( or something along those lines) goes into a cave and finds a cane which when he hit's a rock with he transforms into Thor! Not what was betrayed in to Movie, on earth he IS Thor...without his powers, he's not a doctor.
2ndly If Thor is without his hammer for more than 60 seconds he turns back into Donald. In the movie he doesn't have his hammer for a majority of the time so he shouldn't be or look like Thor.
Also Jane Foster is Donald's nurse in his practice, but in the Movie she a scientist and doesn't even work for Donald because he isn't even in it, the names used but it doesn't mean it's him.
I can fully understand why they made the changes but it's not really subtle ones, they are quite big to the Origin.
Comment telling me what you think.

  • 19 results
  • 1
  • 2