Vivke

This user has not updated recently.

27 0 5 0
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Vivke's forum posts

  • 27 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Avatar image for vivke
Vivke

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Vivke
@comicweakness said:

@machomustachio: Not lesbian bisexual, and they're bonds weren't erased believe the end of their relationship was when the faceless joker tried to cut off her face as well for them to be together again. I really hate that they are trying to keep them apart with him as an abusive boyfriend and her just sleeping around with boring characters. To me Joker was Yin (darkness) but Harley was that little speck of light, Joker being so evil that the only good had to be outside of himself.. sucks.

I think you are misinterpreting and romanticizing them too much in the New 52. Joker in the New 52 was torturing Harley mentally for fun. He said he is going to cut her face and Harley was okay with it. She asked "will I be still beautiful?" to which Joker: "When did I ever say you are beautiful?" The reason he would want to cut her face is totally egoistic and not about "being together with her." It is about making her the same as him like a toy, a creation he can replace anytime, an object he could throw away anytime. No mention he was just messing with her for fun.

He said this pain will be nothing like before, it will hurt like hell. Then Harley prepared herself and Joker put the Red Hood mask on her head and just left(laughing his ass off I bet). So when she opened her eyes she only saw red. This was a total psychological torture and mindgame for fun. Nothing else.

Not to mention he kept several Harleys in the dungeon clearly stating to Harley: "You are replacable." Whether those girls were real or not doesn't matter. He purposely made Harley see them to torture her.

Joker has stepped above simple human emotions since about Grant Morrison (I think) and people should just accept it.

Back to this topic: thank god it is only a hallucination. Honestly I just cringe when I see things like this. Joker does not have normal human emotions anymore otherwise he would have a weak point. Well he does have a certain person who could be his weak point but imo that is not Harley. That would mean Joker is human which he is not. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Avatar image for vivke
Vivke

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By Vivke

Joker and Harley are not Bonnie and Clyde and never can be. This is mostly the fantasy of people who overly romanticize the relationship of Harley and Joker. I blame it on Paul Dini because he did play with this silly idea in some comics, though it turned up mostly in kid's comics. But it literally contradicts with who Joker really is.

You just can't humanize Joker that much. You. just. can't. That takes away from his evilness, from his cruelness and make him more sympathetic or even victimized which is a terrible idea. He is not that in 90% of his incarnations. He cannot love the way many Harley/Joker fans want him to.

Also Harley cannot strike back at him most of the time:. 1. because she is submissive to him 2. she believes Joker is just a little bit violent nothing much but deep down he loves her for sure. Yikes.

They won't tone down Joker for Harley to show that deep down he does have a normal human heart. He is a villain for god's sake. The only way he can feel love is through obsession. And in lots of instances the the subject of his obsession is Batman, the only person he respects as an equal.

Avatar image for vivke
Vivke

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@vivke: I agree that they need to show why Harley would leave him. This is what Assault on Arkham failed to do. The fact they may use that as it's source material bothers me a lot because I thought it was awful.

And they have Margot Robbie on a decade-long contract as Harley, I find it strange though that she might end up leaving him in the beginning. That would probably mean she will go a long time without him in the DCCU.

I personally liked Assault on Arkham though Joker was terribly out of character. Like the moment he was talking about Harley's skin like that. Not Jokerish at all. You can't distract Joker with "trivial" things like how good Harley looks... I hope they do not use that as a source. Though now in Suicide Squad he looks like a pimp. So who knows? lol.

Yes, it's a bit early for Harley to leave Joker right at the beginning but since it is a Suicide Squad movie and sequel I don't think it would be good if they were "together". Also in my opinion not many people would like to see their true, realistic relationship through several episodes. Because the viler Joker gets, the more terribly he treats Harley. Since they mostly take the New 52 as a source I can imagine that Joker won't be tame and obviously they won't tone him down for Harley's sake.

Not to mention Jared Leto is usually a support actor and does not play in sequels. So they just hopefully and conviniently end the relaionship of Harley and Joker here in the beginning.

Avatar image for vivke
Vivke

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@flameboy298: I know it was a mash up and it looked terrible but I honestly read somewhere that it was official. Lol. Okay. Nevermind.

Avatar image for vivke
Vivke

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@scouterv said:

@vivke: Perhaps, but I figure DC will do their best to avoid the Feminazies and SJWs. They'll likely avoid a Harley that lets Joker beat her.

Aside from that, Harley is difficult to catch too with her gymnastic ability. I feel at least she can avoid Joker.

I agree with that they will try to satisfy everyone especially people who scream abuse (honestly I do not like their relationship either). But unfortunately they should show first the nature of their relationship so that Harley can move on. I'm sure this is why they do this scene where Joker hits her so hard she fells to the ground.

On the earlier photos of Harley, already in the Suicide Squad, we can see that she is throwing away her 'PUDDIN' choker so I'm guessing she will move on but for that Joker has to do something pretty bad first. And they will have to show it.

Avatar image for vivke
Vivke

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@scouterv: As I see it, Harley does not strike back most of the time when Joker hurts her. There are a very few times (some from kid's comics, one from No Man's land when she was enhanced by Ivy, one from a seperate comic, and some from the New 52) where she kicks Joker's ass. Still in No Man's land Joker chokes her later and she does not fight back, he kicks her in the face etc. The reason he wins is also because Harley is submissive.

In New 52 she really fought back. That is true. But she still ended up in a dungeon. And also Joker's threshold of pain is terribly different than normal people's.

But I digress. Sorry.

Yeah, he might or might not find it funny next day.

Avatar image for vivke
Vivke

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I understand that people have to produce something for Harley/Joker fans but I have never liked this approach because you have to tone down Joker sooooooo much that it is pathetic.

Like what is Joker? A cutie lovely husband who kills occasionally and has a soft spot for Harley? And just for Harley? God no..... In kid's comics he might be but in the main story he is not.

Avatar image for vivke
Vivke

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@scouterv: Well, if Harley did that I don't think she could walk for a long time after the beating she gets from Joker...

Besides yes, they released a pic where Joker was crouching on a chair and Harley was inking him. Like he would want all those stupid tattoos.ahh

Avatar image for vivke
Vivke

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@scouterv said:

Maybe he likes to feel the pain of getting tattoos? He's not all that inconsistent. You can normally count on him to have some sort of love-hate relationship with Batman, at the very least, and I feel once you introduce even a little consistency, it becomes like Jell-O. There's always room for more.

With that said, consider this: Joker gets tattoos as a way to help him pass time until his next plan. Of course, as you say, he's not going to go to a Tattoo parlor, but I can easily imagine him sitting in a chair while Harley inks him up and he seeths over his latest lost tooth thanks to Batman.

As for damaged? Consider that a final "screw you" from Ms. Quinn on the way out, because that's what she views him as. Damaged goods.

I don't think Joker would let Harley tattoo anything on him that HE does not want. The damaged on his forehead is so childish and not Joker-like that it hurts. Joker is an egoist, he thinks he looks great the way he is.

Not to mention it will distract me when there will be a close up of his face. This is simply a terrible choice by the designers.

Avatar image for vivke
Vivke

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@fallingcliffs: Well, that might be a bit pimpish but they were trying to go for an emperor look which is not the same. And this was one occasion.

Also he doesn't have tattoos,grill teeth and a Lamborghini :D

  • 27 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3