Stark can only cause damage physically or hitting the ground for Aoe, both which fail because he doesn't get a chance, he throws a punch, Iron-fist repels from the opposite side with an even harder one sending it back and distinguishing his durability bit by bit while dodging effectively. He tries to hit the ground, he gets an Iron-fisted uppercut.
Where are you getting this stufff? Like what is this even based on?
If Midnighter is strong enough to hurt Mallen (which I don't know). He will win. Because of the Battle Computer, Mallen wouldn't be half the fighter that Midnighter is, he was only able to fight well against Iron Man because Iron Man was slow at the time in the Pentagon Armor. Extremis Iron Man walked all up and down his ass and then killed him and kicked his dead body and said "That's for making me kill you".
How isn't there? Your entire argument is contingent upon Iron Fist being alot faster than Iron Man (which you haven't proven). You're not only saying that Iron Man won't be able to defend himself but that he's not fast or skilled enough to get hits off, you're telling me that's not an over-estimation for Iron Fist? Really? You're talking about this micro-second reaction time but using scans of an older version of Iron Fist..a version that NO street levelers had trouble tagging or fighting well against, yet somehow he's supposed to dominate a superhumanly fast Iron Man who has fought class 100's and taken a beaten without much damage if any? C'mon..
No, he doesn't. You're showing Iron Fist blasting regular people with Chi but somehow he has a range advantage on Iron Man? A ranged chi attack hasn't yet shown to harm something as durable as Iron Man armor.