@matteopg: you insulted my intelligence 3x. i am just tired of talking to you. all you say is: 'well somebody must like it'. you dismissed my comparison and continued to blabber on. you just keep repeating the same thing over and over again. i have nothing more to say to you on the matter. it's my fault for engaging you.
@matteopg: ok. comics are not only art. they are art + stories. they can both be prooven bad. liefeld - horrible art. lobdell - horrible writing. that is all i am going to say on the matter with you because you are annoyingly dense.
@matteopg: yes, you can. take snyder's run on batman. dribble, mediocre storylines ripped-off from classic batman stories. can you denny that? no you cannot. there is a difference between quality and 'enjoyability'. some people enjoy crack. is it bad? yes. do they enjoy it? yes.
@matteopg: it matters because people that are new to comics are easily entertained by nowadays stories, they dont know that this has been done 15x before. they dont have the knowledge. and it's not silly to proove today's comics are mostly crap or recycled. there will always be people that dont know any better or are fanboys or play the 'change is good' card or are just too dumb to see it. the comic industry is slowly but surely heading for a plunge, due to high prices and oversaturation. after that, quality shall return.