Ok than any comic character works and the limit of my ability are similar to Spiderman's strength limit, Superman's invulnerability limit, Jean's psychokinetic limit, Flash's speed limit, and the same fighting capabilities as Captain America.
Who in the name of GPI is as invulnerable as Superman but as weak as Spider-Man?
This guy has no superhuman strength and is a invulnerable as Superman.
"Sentry. A fruity, homicidal, psychotic, possessed, neurotic, sociopathic, emo crybaby with girly-hair. "
yes...i agree "
Excellent
@Mikepool said:
" @TheCrusader: Don't forget Sentry is also the first person that got infected with the Marvel Zombies Virus... so the whole things kinda his fault... "
How would it be a stalemate? Captain America is a better fighter than Thor whether he has his powers or not...and by miles.It's not even close. "
It can be a stalemate because Thor has 20 lifetimes of combat experience and training Captain america has a couple of decades of combat raining and experience. It is close....by microns.
I'm Guessing there's going to be some type of Thor Corp, or Mjolnir Men or some such thing. Odin or Loki had lots of hammers made to either help with the good fight in the case of the former or they are like the rings in middle earth in the case of the latter, or maybe a wager between a good god and a bad god.
Looks cool though and Juggernaut looks quite menacing in the pic with Hercules.
I read the scan. Alluding to him destroying planets in the microverse is not proof of planet busting. This is what is called hyperbole. "
So You are in opposite to what is clearly said in narration?How many hyperbole's like that You know? Because hyperbole are most often used by other characters, like Spidey saying that Sentry stalemated Galactus, while we already know that he did it but not alone. Besides, stalemating Photon is a high feats itself. And it doesn't matter where it happened, it is only different dimension.
You clearly don't know the definition of hyperbole. Hyperbole is used by writers in narration also.
It surely matters where it "happened" (as it didn't happen, the planet busting was alluded to in a moment of writer hyperbole). Different dimensions, by their very nature, have different laws of physics, obviously.
Below is one of thousands of examples of writer hyperbole.
"
1.This is the best example for me, that proves my point. It wasn't hyperbole. They really are that powerfull. Odin already destroyed galaxies at half power (as an Infinity) and then recreate them. 2.Hiro-Kala was able to manipulate a planet in Microverse and later he transprted it to 616 where nothing has changed. Microverse is just different dimension, but people who are in theory smaller, aren't "really" smaller. "
This is normal Odin and it is complete hyperbole. Only someone in denial won't see that.
Manipulating a planet in the microverse and moving it to our universe means nothing. Destroying a planet in our universe is another story.
Different dimensions have different physcis simply by the fact that they ARE different dimensions. Show Sentry busting planets or the narration is nothing but hyperbole.
I read the scan. Alluding to him destroying planets in the microverse is not proof of planet busting. This is what is called hyperbole. "
So You are in opposite to what is clearly said in narration?How many hyperbole's like that You know? Because hyperbole are most often used by other characters, like Spidey saying that Sentry stalemated Galactus, while we already know that he did it but not alone. Besides, stalemating Photon is a high feats itself. And it doesn't matter where it happened, it is only different dimension.
You clearly don't know the definition of hyperbole. Hyperbole is used by writers in narration also.
It surely matters where it "happened" (as it didn't happen, the planet busting was alluded to in a moment of writer hyperbole). Different dimensions, by their very nature, have different laws of physics, obviously.
Below is one of thousands of examples of writer hyperbole.
Log in to comment