@mrdecepticonleader said:
@The Man of Yesteryear said:
@mrdecepticonleader said:
@pooty said:
@mrdecepticonleader: The bible isn't a historical account because there are other accounts and evidence we have in history that prove the bible is not historically accurate
Could you state a few historical accounts from the Bible the historians have disproved? i'm not big on history. thanks
There are quite a few.I came across this.
http://www.answering-christianity.com/abdullah_smith/historical_errors_in_the_gospels-3.htm
Hope it helps somewhat.
You appear to have linked to part of a debate between a militant Muslim and a militant Christian, is there a reason that you think this link is accurate as opposed to the rebuttals?
Did I? I read through it a bit and it seemed okay.
Oh ok. I wasn't saying the link is wrong (I don't think the bible is completely accurate either). I just wanted to see if you also read the responses, because there just seems to be a lot of parts to this debate lol.
Log in to comment