Teerack

"Hey Dark Heart the death eater, or what ever your world of warcraft name is. Suck on it!" -Shazam #JusticeLeagueWar

10703 1614 150 130
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Teerack's forum posts

Avatar image for teerack
Teerack

10703

Forum Posts

1614

Wiki Points

130

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 64

@teerack said:

@captain13 said:

@teerack said:

The FF are meant to be a family not a couple and their buddies, so this is stupid.

It's cute how people are trying to use the "Johnny being white isn't integral to his character" argument that they probably just saw on Reddit and are repeating in an attempt to look smart lol. They would be right if this movie was titled "The Human Torch" but it's not it's the "Fantastic Four". You know what is integral to the character? Being Sue's brother... so unless Sue is Black(which Hollywood wouldn't do) this is stupid.

Or you know, there are families with adopted children. One or both Storms could be adopted. Maybe you should take a look at some modern families.

Did you actually think I didn't think of adoption? Or do you think that it changes anything I said?

Then how are a brother and sister not related? Especially if they were both adopted at birth?

Just thinking about the typical american movie goer and way people think in general I don't see most people perceiving the FF as a real family dynamic when Sue's brother is black. Even if he's adopted or she's adopted people won't really see it as a family, and because there hasn't been an FF movie in a while I'm sure this movie will set an impression of the FF for a lot of people and that's just overall harmful to the series.

And I mean I know that's a littler presumptuous about other people being "racist" but you have to understand usually when people cast for anything they think about this kind of psychology, so I'm assuming they're just being more racist thinking adding a black guy will make the FF more hip and modern, because otherwise it's kind of an irresponsible franchises choice.

Avatar image for teerack
Teerack

10703

Forum Posts

1614

Wiki Points

130

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 64

I think more people would be reading Spider-Man.

Avatar image for teerack
Teerack

10703

Forum Posts

1614

Wiki Points

130

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 64

#3  Edited By Teerack

@teerack said:

The FF are meant to be a family not a couple and their buddies, so this is stupid.

It's cute how people are trying to use the "Johnny being white isn't integral to his character" argument that they probably just saw on Reddit and are repeating in an attempt to look smart lol. They would be right if this movie was titled "The Human Torch" but it's not it's the "Fantastic Four". You know what is integral to the character? Being Sue's brother... so unless Sue is Black(which Hollywood wouldn't do) this is stupid.

Or you know, there are families with adopted children. One or both Storms could be adopted. Maybe you should take a look at some modern families.

Did you actually think I didn't think of adoption? Or do you think that it changes anything I said?

Avatar image for teerack
Teerack

10703

Forum Posts

1614

Wiki Points

130

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 64

#4  Edited By Teerack

The FF are meant to be a family not a couple and their buddies, so this is stupid.

It's cute how people are trying to use the "Johnny being white isn't integral to his character" argument that they probably just saw on Reddit and are repeating in an attempt to look smart lol. They would be right if this movie was titled "The Human Torch" but it's not it's the "Fantastic Four". You know what is integral to the character? Being Sue's brother... so unless Sue is Black(which Hollywood wouldn't do) this is stupid.

Avatar image for teerack
Teerack

10703

Forum Posts

1614

Wiki Points

130

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 64

#5  Edited By Teerack

@deadpool said:

@teerack said:

Renner sucked as Hawkeye. He wasn't able to pull off being a smart ass at all with few lines he had.

That's just the writers' fault.

Well pretty much everything he said in Mission Impossible Ghost Protocol was meant to be witty banter, and the banter was fine he just said it in a really dry serious way like everything else he says. It wouldn't surprise me at all if he was originally meant to be witter in Avengers and they needed to change the dialog for him.

Avatar image for teerack
Teerack

10703

Forum Posts

1614

Wiki Points

130

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 64

@teerack said:

@betatesthighlander1 said:

@teerack:

well, they could just keep on having SIf being the warrior she always was (in the Marvel comics)

you really seem to have something against Thor fans, have you read any of Sif's early stuff in Thor (she saved him fairly often)

and for her being Thor's girlfriend, that is kind of a huge part of her character (allways has been) if you want a character who isn't Thor's girlfriend, than you don't really want Sif

that's just an image of a guy standing on a rock

Oh I didn't realize you like it when characters never change, evolve, or improve.

"and for her being Thor's girlfriend, that is kind of a huge part of her character (allways has been) if you want a character who isn't Thor's girlfriend, than you don't really want Sif"

Wow... that is absolutely hilarious xD

And that was an image of the cover of The Might Thor issue 8. That's where the story starts where everyone thought Tanarus was Thor.... so you could look into it.

well, it just seems like a big change that came out of nowhere, I mean, that's like if they wanted to have WW and Superman have a romance

so do you disagree? because you seem to think what I said was funny for some reason (having a character be nothing like what they are is the same as making a new character)

I'll consider looking int09oo that I guess

Yes I disagree, and I found it funny because you're proving my point without even realizing it. You're saying that Sif is Thor's girlfriend, and by her not just being Thor's girlfriend she's acting out of character? That is a huge problem that Marvel is trying to fix with JiM, and the fact that you'd actually say If I don't want to read about Thor's girlfriend Sif isn't for me? I'm sorry but Sif has a lot more potential as a character then that, so maybe Sif isn't for you.

Avatar image for teerack
Teerack

10703

Forum Posts

1614

Wiki Points

130

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 64

@teerack:

well, they could just keep on having SIf being the warrior she always was (in the Marvel comics)

you really seem to have something against Thor fans, have you read any of Sif's early stuff in Thor (she saved him fairly often)

and for her being Thor's girlfriend, that is kind of a huge part of her character (allways has been) if you want a character who isn't Thor's girlfriend, than you don't really want Sif

that's just an image of a guy standing on a rock

Oh I didn't realize you like it when characters never change, evolve, or improve.

"and for her being Thor's girlfriend, that is kind of a huge part of her character (allways has been) if you want a character who isn't Thor's girlfriend, than you don't really want Sif"

Wow... that is absolutely hilarious xD

And that was an image of the cover of The Might Thor issue 8. That's where the story starts where everyone thought Tanarus was Thor.... so you could look into it.

Avatar image for teerack
Teerack

10703

Forum Posts

1614

Wiki Points

130

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 64

#8  Edited By Teerack

@betatesthighlander1 said:

@teerack said:

@betatesthighlander1 said:

@teerack said:

@betatesthighlander1 said:

@teerack said:

@betatesthighlander1 said:

@teerack said:

Enchantress because I like single Sif.

really?

why do you prefer her single?

Have you been reading Journey Into Mystery?

I get most of my comics from TPB's

is she single/divorced in that series?

Well Thor hasn't been in it at all sense Sif became the main character. I think that Sif and Thor broke it off a little while after Fear Itself once Thor returned. She's a bad ass and I think adding a love interest would just weight her down. It would also sorta kill the rebellious/independence theme of the book.

well, I doubt Thor would weigh her down much

I don't know about the rebellious theme (sorry)

and did Thor actually break it off with her (seems out of character, they seem to really like each other) are you sure it has nothing to do with thor's apparent death?

anyways, why would the theme of the book require more integrity than thousands of years of myth?

Thor would weigh her down, she doesn't need Thor keeping her in his shadow.

Sif broke up with the Thor that everyone thought was Thor after Fear Itself, and then once the real Thor returned there hasn't been any Sif and Thor romance so I think Sif might just think she broke up with real Thor.

Thousands of years of myths? Really? 90% of Thor stories don't follow any kind of myth accurately.

They've always been partners more than anything else, One being famous doesn't make the other less so

wait what? when did all of that happen?

fair enough

I don't know how you can actually believe that. Thor steals the spotlight all the time, and considering JiM is finally Sif's big chance to shine on her own Thor would only get in the way of that. I don't mean that in the sense where he would get in the way of battle, but when Thor just owns everything around her faster then she can kill one thing(and if they didn't show that kind of power difference the book would get shit for it because most Thor fans cry when Thor isn't the best at everything) it's going to take away from her.

Not to mention that sense Sif is the main character there would probably come a time where Thor would get beating by something because of his own arrogance, and Sif would end up saving the day. The only problem with that would be people wouldn't care that Sif got to look cool they would just complain about how Thor should have won. Sense the point of the book is about Sif and making her cooler and more popular you can't team her up with a popularity eclipse like Thor.

As it is right now one of the biggest issues with Sif is that people define her as Thor's girlfriend, and I'm not saying you do. I'm saying that a lot of people do, so Thor and Sif dating being part of Sif's JiM would be a horrible idea.

It happened right after fear itself

http://images.wikia.com/marveldatabase/images/7/79/The_Mighty_Thor_Vol_1_8.jpg (i would have posed the image but as usual the interface for this forum is bugging up)

Avatar image for teerack
Teerack

10703

Forum Posts

1614

Wiki Points

130

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 64

@jonsmith said:

Batman takes care of all of DD's in one night, cleans up Hell's Kitchen and keeps it that way.s

In a single night.

Daredevil kills Joker, and locks up some other's, but he's used to patrolling a neighborhood, not a city. Not exactly something he can search entirely on foot. Aside from that, a lot of Batman's foes, Batman beats through tech and planning rather than brute force. Guys like Clayface, for example. While Daredevil's decent with prep normally, he's out of his element and doesn't have access to the kind of tech Batman does. Unless he calls in one of Batman's old sidekicks to help, I don't see him beating Clayface.

Because of all of Batman's great success cleaning up Gotham. /snickers.

Avatar image for teerack
Teerack

10703

Forum Posts

1614

Wiki Points

130

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 64

#10  Edited By Teerack

I hope Superman kicks his butt!