@heavenlydarkdragon: Exactly, seeing what Jon did to Superman it's a miracle Batman survived unscathed despite the kevlar, yet the Smiths were not even bothered, didn't apologize or anything, also for laying waste to Batman's Moon bunker btw, an apology wouldn't go amiss. Anyway, I just don't wanna put up with Jon in Trinity, if this is another Superman guest starring Wonder Woman I'm not interested
Well first off, both Superman and Jon make a point to offer to fix both the Moon and Batman's base at the end of issue #6. I'm not sure if you overlooked this or you didn't read past issue 5, but it's there if you look back.
Second, given the fact that Clark helped to fix the Moon and Batman's base, I think it's a pretty safe bet that he and his family apologized off screen. But most importantly Jon apologizes to Bruce at dinner.
Third, the most foolish thing they could do is lock Jon away in the Fortress. That's just asking to create a socially inept and emotionally unbalanced man-god when he grows up. You seal him off from human interaction, and you create a very real issue for the planet down the line. The Kents never locked Clark away in the basement even though he had just as much potential to burn people alive as Jon does now. Hell, Clark even broke Pete's arm when they were little, and could've set Lana on fire at school (secret origins). It's also just a comic book, so there's that.
Forth, this isn't a Superman comic. It's a Superman, Wonder Woman, and Batman comic. This means that even though we get parts of the individual character's lives, we don't get the whole thing for the whole book because there are two more stars in it. We don't get Clark talking to his son about the importance of power control because we've got to move along to the dinner scene. We get a small sense of their family life (illustrated by Jon and Lois talking and Clark's secret pathways) but we don't fully explore it because it's not the point of the comic. We saw that there was dinner on the table, but we never saw Lois make it, and we never saw them eat it. All we needed to really know was that Jon was ashamed of his actions, and he felt sorry. Even the whole point with Jon disobeying his dad and using his powers was to set up Bruce's line to Clark while Jon was sleeping. It was manufactured so Bruce could start to relate to this new Clark over the idea of having a son. I'll remind you that Damian (under Bruce's watch) killed at least two men in cold blood. But anyways, the point is for Clark and Bruce to relate over the idea of them fathering new life individually. This is in contrast to the New 52, because Bruce explains that he established his bond with that Superman over the idea of death. It's thematic, and serves the greater whole of the book/concept.
Log in to comment