@veshark: "claiming that I know nothing about him just because I disagree with your opinion seems like a rather silly thing to say"
So does saying "You know nothing about Black Panther" as a rebuttal.
"Ra's al Ghul did"
And? Batman's defeated Ra's al Ghul in the past, are you somehow insinuating that he wouldn't of been able to? Do you realize how ridiculous and nonsensical that sounds? If Ra's al Ghul decided to steal Batman's plans for taking out the Justice League instead of devising his own plans, doesn't that hint in the tiniest bit towards Batman being superior? I'll answer that for you, yes it does, and yes he is, BTW, Batman also killed Ra's al Ghul. And he wouldn't of taken the Justice League all out at once in an immediate fight, Batman's most difficult fights have always been resolved over long periods of time in which he'd allowed himself preparation, as he would if he met Black Panther who happened to be evil for some reason or another. Also, New 52 is a reboot, so I have no idea why you're even mentioning it.
"The reason why Panther's vibranium suit is so durable isn't because it's 'indestructible' - it's because it absorbs momentum and vibration"
I already stated this. There's more things you can do with metal than punch it. For one, you can blow it up, which appears to be one of its weaknesses. And guess what, Batman has explosive batarangs, as well as plastic explosives.
"'Batman can beat the entire JLA, who can beat Panther, therefore Batman can beat Panther' is an inherently flawed argument"
How is it flawed. Tell me what flaw is keeping that argument from being logically sound.
"Batman has never actually beaten the JLA even once"
Excluding the fact that the plans designed by Batman worked when an inferior villain to him took them and executed them, he has gone toe to toe with every member in the Justice League individually and, not killed them, but has gotten the better of them. The villain equivalent to Batman would be Deathstroke, who Batman regularly fights with, and who has taken out Justice League members in the past, such as The Flash.
"And if you want to talk contingency plans, Panther has Galactus contingency plans."
Batmans gone toe to toe with Darkseid who is arguably an equivalent to Galactus, and gotten the better of him.
"You’re forgetting that T’Challa happens to be a genius"
So is Batman....And Superman. In fact, Superman possesses intellect that's considered beyond genius level, but they keep Batman on as the primary strategist and tactician of the Justice League, so that means in essence that Batman is more tactically/strategically sound than a man who is beyond genius level intellect. Over the years, Batman has accumulated a god-like strategic level of thought with no other character in any comic book coming to claim such a mythological mastermind status as him, except maybe for Brainiac. Why? He outsmarts every single villain he faces. This is not a fact mind you, just an observation. It is stated several times by multiple characters in the DCU though that Batman has one of the highest levels of intellect.
"We’re talking someone whom – with prep time – has taken down the likes of Magneto, Mephisto, Dr. Doom, and a Stealth Iron Man"
And with Batman we have Bane, Darkseid (in the words of a rather humorous Cracked article that references Batman killing Darkseid 'Batman dueled god, and god was a little too slow'"), Riddler, Clayface, Deathstroke, Solomon Grundy, Ra's Al Ghul, Bat-mite (Batman's version of Mister Mxyzptlk, who is considered god/omniscient tier), Superman (Dark Knight Returns), the entirety of the Legion of Doom (bribed one of them to betray the rest), Owlman (Essentially defeating himself, showing that he is, indeed, better than even himself), I believe I also recall him defeating Captain America (but I'm sure a bunch of Marvel fanboys will come running to yell NON-CANON! at that, and me, and while we're on the subject, he also beat Jackie Estacado from The Darkness), and actually, he DID canonically defeat Spawn, since it was referenced in spawns OWN continuity in his OWN comics. Sorry, but it appears Batman's list is far more impressive, and I haven't even listed all the top-tiers he's taken down.
P.S. Ever since Squirrel Girl defeated Dr. Doom, he's been thought of as a pathetic pushover.
"Panther comes with intangible energy daggers"
You know who else has "intangibility"? Martian Manhunter, you know what happened to him? Batman beat him, I'm a fan of MM and I can even admit that.
"His anti-metal claws will tear through any metal tech that Bats has"
Yea, his claws are just that "anti-metal", not "anti-matter", most body armor is made of synthetic components anyway by the way, and if I'm reading up on it correctly, then it does this "This variation produces vibrations of a specific wavelength that breaks down the molecular bonds in other metals". And since his batsuit isn't made of metal, I'm beginning to wonder how effective his claws would even be.
"The only version of the character that kills is Golden Age Batman"
Except for, you know, the new version that killed Darkseid with a bullet filled with Radion.
"which means that BP has an edge because Panther will be more willing to use lethal force."
Batman doesn't kill, unless he does. That's pretty much how it's gone for the entirety of his existence and really only became an "iconic" aspect of his willpower in more recent years.
"And whose suit comes with a force-field, cloaking, teleportation, and knives that can pierce a Galactus Herald."
And Batman has Watchtower.
"BP is useless without his vibranium, Batman is the best"
Don't be so immature. Batman is the best at what he does in the DC universe, Black Panther isn't. That's just a matter of facts. Batman and Black Panther have never gone toe to toe, I don't think, so there's no conceivable way to rationalize which would be better when matching them up against each other, besides using subjective means, which I've presented, through logical deduction.
"especially with prep time, but yours most certainly isn’t it"
The only reason you say mine most certainly isn't is because you don't like the fact that it applies deductive logic. The only thing you're willing to throw at me, are the exact same reasons I've been saying Batman can win, feats, villains, and abilities. You're just saying "yours isn't it" because I'm not circumventing Batmans wins, I'm not going to lie by saying I know what Batman would come up with to beat Black Panther because I honestly don't know, what he would come up with, but then again, I'm also not a comic-book writer who's making a comic between the two fighting, so I can't make up cheese for why either would beat the other. Quit throwing a tantrum at the facts I present and accept them for what they are, if you actually read what I posted, I said "that is why I do not believe that Batman would lose", just like everyone else here, I'm explaining my opinion, if you're not mature enough to accept that then that's your problem, since I've supported and presented everything I need to, as accurately as needed, to support my decision.
Everything I've stated thus far has been correct when applied to the direct context it was mentioned in. If you extrapolate upon it, bringing up "other" varieties of vibranium (like you did) does my argument at all falter, but not because of any inaccuracies of my own. Think about what you're writing, the majority of what you said wasn't even logically sound, most of which is widely-known, common knowledge of Batman, whom you state you know "very well". It seems that the only argument here that isn't a "good" argument is yours.
Log in to comment