This is low-brow identity politics I would never have expected even from you all.
"Black Lives Matters Sniper Attack" how is that not an insinuation? I wouldn't be surprised is people got it confused with a Fox News article. Why not just put "Sniper Attack at BLM Rally"? I wouldn't have expected someone to so blatantly contradict themselves in a matter of hours.
You know me, man. I hate negroes and me dumb...carry on
You're trying to make a point/troll but you're not helping your case lol
I don't even know what those words mean. My mind is too clouded with hatred for the negro.
This is low-brow identity politics I would never have expected even from you all.
"Black Lives Matters Sniper Attack" how is that not an insinuation? I wouldn't be surprised is people got it confused with a Fox News article. Why not just put "Sniper Attack at BLM Rally"? I wouldn't have expected someone to so blatantly contradict themselves in a matter of hours.
You know me, man. I hate negroes and me dumb...carry on
@sog7dc: You should change your thread title then. The easiest way to interpret what you wrote was a BLM sniper attacked something. If you want to blame everyone else for jumping to conclusions about you, perhaps you should look into why they're doing so instead of playing the victim.
no one is playing the victim. They made a shitty claim based on nothing.
Identity politics is trafficked by idiots. You guys aren't idiots, but what you posted was idiotic. YOU jumped to a conclusion of my intent based on how you perceive my identity.
You need to admit fault for a shitty, thoughtless accusation.
So that's why everybody, even people clearly against BLM, interpreted your topic the same as myself and others??? Lol again, you either knew what you were doing or you made a click bait title. And now you're name calling....anger is usually an indicator of guilt hmmmmm
I literally said, you aren't idiots...btw, enjoy the real clickbait.
This thread is the comicvine equivalent of Fox News. OP puts "Black Lives Matter" into the thread title to spin his own narrative, and take a firm position against a group he doesn't like before even getting the facts straight. And it's funny because OP is so concerned with facts when innocent black men die. Just food for thought.
This is the lowest and most vile tactic f opposition I've ever seen on this site. I never insinuated that BLM was responsible. The only thing I said was there was a sniper attack at a BLM rally, which is factual. If you interpret the title as something that attributes blame, then that's your issue or, you know, you could have freaking asked. But no, lets all circle jerk eachother and think we know the thoughts and intents of someone else because we disagreed with them before.
This is low-brow identity politics I would never have expected even from you all.
You can't blame anybody for interpreting your topic as anti-BLM since, judging by your posts, you are in fact anti BLM :/
Hell, your topic is "Black lives matter sniper attack", not "Sniper attack at BLM protest/rally"
So don't try to play the victim now. You either knew exactly what you were going for or you need to just admit that you are at fault for a shitty title.
Identity politics is trafficked by idiots. You guys aren't idiots, but what you posted was idiotic. YOU jumped to a conclusion of my intent based on how you perceive my identity.
You need to admit fault for a shitty, thoughtless accusation.
Log in to comment