SmashBrawler

@Ironhawk22 said:

@cameron83: You do realize some people have different opinions then you? Also I've only seen one person complain, and no Cassie doesn't exist. Oh and please don't use the "r word".

Yes, Cassie does exist. We're talking about Cassandra Sandsmark here.

Wolverine

@ahgunsillyo said:

I'm curious, though, about the context for Brett Booth's Red Robin redesign up there. Was that an unused design for the New 52, or a new redesign to replace his current outfit, or what?

Rejected concept. Apparently, DC was hellbent on giving Red Robin wings. No idea why.

Terrible marketing. It had nothing to do with superhero fatigue (I never saw one person saying "oh, a new superhero movie"), or action movie fatigue. It's just bad marketing. Dredd is still relatively unknown in the US (or anywhere outside the UK), and the Stallone film is their only reference. When I saw the first trailer my reaction was "wow, this looks bad", and a lot of people thought so as well, people who saw the movie and loved it (including myself). The marketing was horrible, this should have been THE movie before The Hobbit, but they didn't do any kind of effort. It was as bad as John Carter (and we all know what happened to that movie).

@Rioteer1994 said:

@SmashBrawler said:

Jeez, did nobody here read Batman?

"Lincoln March".

though it was some mummy who's back is the sun

Nah, I'm talking about YourNeighborhoodComicGeek's avatar.

Earth 2

Jeez, did nobody here read Batman?

"Lincoln March".

@grenade728 said:

I know this isn't the funniest ever and it's kind of mean, but in the Red Hood and the Outlaws Court of Owls issue, Batgirl was waiting for Bruce, but Jason showed up and said "nice Legs"! I thought that was hilarious.

Oh God, now I gotta buy that issue. RHATO 9, right?

Well, Batman doesn't star this one, but Batgirl: Year One is not only lighthearted, but also pretty good.

Meh, the eyepiece looks dumb, but it's still better than the Arkham City design...