SlimJ87D's forum posts

#1 Posted by SlimJ87D (11031 posts) - - Show Bio

Harley Quinn is going to win.

Honestly, this fight isn't going to go the way everyone thinks... Harley will get in the way.

#2 Edited by SlimJ87D (11031 posts) - - Show Bio

@agent_murdoch: quicksilver has knowledge on the symbiote and it's weaknesses.

http://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/12/127692/3672279-quicksilver+1.jpg

#3 Posted by SlimJ87D (11031 posts) - - Show Bio

@comicstooge: yeah, I'm not sure how the yata mirror works exactly

I'll just say that Itachi should win if the yata mirror is overpowered, Minato should win if it works as you said.

Itachi is too vague of a character. People here well say the dust crow technique would one shot Minato, even though it's a technique borderline with pis since it was only lyrics used one, doesn't have a databook entry and was never used in a real battle.

#5 Posted by SlimJ87D (11031 posts) - - Show Bio

@44orhsaj: Jashro? did you retire your other account?

#6 Posted by SlimJ87D (11031 posts) - - Show Bio

@newecho said:

@slimj87d:

Oh I understand where you are coming from... But hitting him through something doesn't necessarily mean anything either... To me it would have to be a clear sign of her not holding back or the writer telling us that she hit him with all of her might or the force of "fill in the blank"... if that makes sense... I mean to me context of a fight is very important... I mean I can show you scans of iron man beating the crap out of hulk and it even looks like he knocked him out... but without context knowing that hulk is holding back and making it look like he got knocked out because tony had gamma poisioning and he was setting another bomb to make tony better.. you would think that the hulk got beat.. so for me,, context is very important...

Fair enough. But if you're going to use ABC logic and compare characters of different tier levels, you really don't have much to go off of unless if you can give some logical explanation. Like in my example, if Hawkman was punched or thrown deep into a SUV, surely it would prove he could take Iron Fist's punch that smashed a van. But if Wonder Woman just smacked him, how can we be 100% certain it's at the same level of a hit Iron Fist would give without anything to reference off of? At least any type of collateral damage would be a good and fair reference. Just having a good reference in your argument makes it hard for anyone to question your logic; if you have consistency than that even refines your argument even further. Having no reference makes the feat plausible but more context is needed for consistency purposes. Having neither just makes it unbelievable till proven.

#7 Posted by SlimJ87D (11031 posts) - - Show Bio

@newecho said:

@cable_extreme:

Yeah you can't use abc logic to prove a point.. their needs to be documentation of said feat ie did wonder woman hit him as hard as she normally does?? Was she holding back?? I asked him all that too but he accused me of being a troll and a know it all...It doesn't make sense that Slade could do the things that he did to him but yet he can take wonder woman's best?? I mean unless he seriously didn't know how to use his powers then like he said?? which doesn't make sense because he knew about nth metal since the birth of the new 52, so How would he not know how to use his powers??? I don't know much about new 52 carter tho except his nth metal is tied to his healing factor... I know his durability is better in the new 52.. I do know about slade and the other two characters however..And my opinion is if you have to nerf opponents then someone doesn't belong in the match up... I would have never commented on the thread if the speed would have been equalized at first... I actually was hoping to get more info on carter also... Has Carter became more skilled?? because both daken and danny are more skilled than slade and if he could do that with speed and skill then why couldn't daken and danny???

Yes, and I totally tried to help the new user here understand how we do things on the vine.

Wonder Woman kicking Superman through a bunch of walls and 100s of feet away would suggest that she hit him with enough force to cause as much collateral damage. At least we have that collateral damage to go off of.

Wonder Woman smacking Hawkman on a single panel without further context behind it makes it hard to quantify.

Wonder Woman is stronger than Iron Fist. But just because Hawkman took her punch doesn't mean we can use ABC logic and say that Hawkman can take Iron Fists punch, this wasn't solid evidence to me and by questioning it I received an array of insults.

Now if Wonder Woman hit Hawkman through a ship or through a very thick metal panel, it maybe quantifiable and comparable to feats that IF has done, such as punching and smashing a van in half.

Now the reason why we have to quantify such feats is because of the marginally large strength gap between Wonder Woman and Hawkman, there's no saying as to how hard Wonder Woman hit Hawkman or if PIS was involved, because with common sense Hawkman shouldn't be able to take a hit from Wonder Woman due to the tier difference between the two. That's why it's hard to create ABC logic between Hawkman, Wonder Woman and Iron Fist.

This is my side of the story and what I have been trying to convey in this thread. So let me know how you feel about that.

#8 Posted by SlimJ87D (11031 posts) - - Show Bio

@slimj87d said:

@thenaughtytitan said:

@slimj87d said:

@cable_extreme: @speedster101:

Is there anything I said confusing here that should put me at a 2nd grade level to you guys?

Trying to make real life physics apply to fiction when it has been shown multiple times they do not. Wonder woman was bloodlusted and she hit him, that is how you gauge the scan. Hawkman tanking a hit from someone of her strength level is the feat. Just because he did not fly away does not change that she did not hold back.

Didn't you say earlier you were going to shut up in your own thread? Well?

Changed my mind when multiple people in my thread are still talking about things that have nothing to do with my thread. Also good way dodging the question, you cannot disprove the feat and it is funny to watch you try.

Why do I need to REPEAT what I posted again to you? You want to continue to agree to disagree?

Don't tag me anymore in this crappy OP where the OP argues and insults people.

#9 Posted by SlimJ87D (11031 posts) - - Show Bio

@slimj87d said:

@cable_extreme: @speedster101:

Is there anything I said confusing here that should put me at a 2nd grade level to you guys?

Trying to make real life physics apply to fiction when it has been shown multiple times they do not. Wonder woman was bloodlusted and she hit him, that is how you gauge the scan. Hawkman tanking a hit from someone of her strength level is the feat. Just because he did not fly away does not change that she did not hold back.

Didn't you say earlier you were going to shut up in your own thread? Well?

#10 Posted by SlimJ87D (11031 posts) - - Show Bio