Skunkstein

Never... wouldnt happen, i can promise that.

Besides, i dont want it to happend.. Why would i like to see Superman die? no way. no thanks.

So.... how do you measure smarts?

I voted Bats, and im surprised so many people voted Tony.

Okay.... I know this guy, genius really, that is when it comes to Math, science and chemistry (the last one in a lesser extent), im more or less an idiot when it comes to math... but when we discuss politics, life and sociality.... he is naive and doesnt have much to bring to the table, so is he smarter than be because he is better in some fields than i am? I dont think so, he is however smarter in some ways where im smarter in others.

If i needed a supersuit, or a guy to fix my car, i would go to Tony, but i still say that overall... Batman is miles ahead of Tony.

Batman is wiser, more cunning, clever. He excels or shines in nearly every form of study, going from science to fiction, mythology, psychology and more.

Tony Stark seems to only have his head in the area of science, technology, astrology and the ladiiies - he is however crazy smarts in those fields.

Still overall ill say Batman is smarter than Tony... no doubt in my mind.

Got a huge dick.

I dont buy it, sure if we talk about technological advancement then a lot of what you say is truth, and sure you can hyperbole the idea that Krypton dont know of any other living race.

But my point is that its bad writing, whenever someone has to go so such extreme lengths to actually rethink the whole kryptonian history in ''fan fiction'' proves my point. It just makes this crazy advanced civilization that is Krypton seem stupid, ignorant and naive... which is kinda the opposite of everything the DC universe is trying to make the Kryptonian civilization out to be.

In the main DC universe, Krypton is very close to earth, in a cosmic sense. In Birthright its VERY far from Earth, so the deal with not knowing life makes a bit more sense in that story! Still that sentence annoys me!

Yep, thats the damn truth.

I honestly dont know precisely... but i think he is supposed to like... crazy strong, i saw him kinda like a joke on Sentry.

Ive been into the theater.. watching it, i think 3, no 4 times, yeah 4 times now. And i have warmed A LOT up for it! A LOT!

However even after the first time i saw it, and disliked it, it was never because of him killing Zod.

Dont you think that in the view of the movieverse, that letting a man who was about to destroy humanity live, would be... the opposite of our protector? Especially when we saw in what way he killed Zod, it was a last resort, plus he cleary felt terrible about what he did after he snapped his neck.

I respect your opinion, and i see where the people who disliked the ''murder'' is coming from, because it IS very much unlike Superman to take anyones life. However, if you sit in Zack Snyder shoes, and you wanted to show a protector of humanity to the average guy i would make Superman kill Zod aswell, honestly in the context of the movie and the movieverse, it would be incompetent of Superman to let Zod live, he isnt just a villian or a criminal he actually was about to destroy humanity plus he has the powers of a god, if he would let such a guy live, with the power he had... wouldnt he be the exact opposite of our protector?

The decision to make Superman kill Zod in this movie creates a way to make people understand why he has his moral compass, and why Superman is as we see him in the comics - our protector -.

Plus if you have a character that EVERYONE knows would never, ever, ever kill anyone, it would for a lot of casual fans make a lot of future fights very boring. Now we have this thought put into our head, that Superman is actually capable of more, which could create some interesting fights.

@ssejllenrad said:

@dregonspengler said:

Thanks both!

bump