@RUKM: A lot of the re-write of Batman villains gave the characters the same sense of tragedy that Batman faced - the difference being Bruce decided not to take vengeance - the best written being Mr. Freeze and Two-Face (as you noted).
@MyronLee26: I'm sure he'll think of something to even the odds...he always does.
I mean this pretty much proved the resourcefulness he possesses without technology, or even memory:
Nice costumes, but remember those were in different eras@Phaedrusgr said:
@speedlgt: Never thought of that, Cap taking down Ironman. One could say that Cap has knowledge of Tony's suit, plus he has that shield that can damage almost anything. Could Batman find a way to defeat Stark's technology within minutes, before Ironman's artillery is unleashed? Some viners mentioned that Batman would definitely beat him in a second encounter. Yeah, I don't disagree at all, but a second encounter wasn't even in the parameters of this thread. Anyway, I'd love to say, Batman wins, but I feel it's a little bit too much, despite his brilliant spirit/amazing abilities and enormous passion to serve his cause. survive, win.
I have to say Iron Man with Bleeding Edge
My point exactly. To be able to survive all those eras without a functioning memory, or technology (he's trained with) proves what Batman could do with limited resources. Now, if we expand those resources to encompass similar technology to Ironman (to level the playing field), the odds may be in favour of the Gotham-native.
Exactly, He survived in eras that didn't need technology and against people that didn't have it, Doesn't mean it's special and he can survive against a Bleeding Edge Tony
Are you sure? The prehistoric era WAS the first challenge - filled with inhabitants that did nothing but lift heavy rocks and kill all day long.
That's not a challenge
Him survivng in a world where technology wasnt NEEDED doesnt mean he can win where technology is.
Log in to comment