I actually didn't get circumcised until I was a teenager and had some choice in the matter. I didn't really feel strongly either way by my grandparents wanted me to be circumcised for cultural/religious reasons. Their are pros and cons, one pro being I could give consent, the con being, as far as I understand it, its way more painful and complicated and the benefits of being circumcised are obviously delayed. Having experienced a bit of both sides so to speak, I personally prefer being circumcised.
Male circumcision also as I understand is quite different to female circumcision, hence why traditionally and culturally it has been viewed in a different light. Not saying that justifies anything, it is what it is, not everything natural is better either, plenty of people groom or desire minor body modifications to improve quality of life. I am not well versed on the negatives involved with circumcision, like possible loss of sensitivity, ability to derive please and all that, so in my current understanding, which may be naive, the only real negative for male circumcision is lack of consent/the irreversibility of the decision.
If I had a son, if the mother had strong opinions on this, as in wanting circumcision, I would probably follow her lead, otherwise I would actually just leave the foreskin intact and let my son decide later on if he wanted to be circumcised or not. I would tell him my own experience and apologize if need be if he is annoyed he has to endure more pain heh heh.