rpottage

This user has not updated recently.

969 0 18 12
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

rpottage's forum posts

Avatar image for rpottage
rpottage

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Post endgame duo win. Carol now can definitely take a fight to Clark one on one and this would allow Thor to put SB straight thru his back. She MAY now even be avle to solo

1. Carol carrying starship Tony was in equals shuttle and Air force 1 feat.

2. Her strikes on Thanos did visibly more damage than Mjilnor strikes.

3. While we didnt get a confirmed speed of her distance travelled to Avenger mansion in the post credit screens of IW we did get confirmation it was less than 3 weeks. Now its possible she warped there but Thanos ship wouldnt have been firing into warp as ahe joined the battle AND she was out of Stark sensor range and arrived pretty damn quick.

So her speed is travel speed, not combat speed; so I'm not sure how important it is.

And this is probably lowballing her a little bit; but since we don't really have more information it's the best I could do:

Friday says something is entering the atmosphere, which is 100 km from earth. It's maybe 10 seconds later when Carol arrives to earth. That's 10 seconds to go 100km. 100km in 10 seconds is 360 000 km/h. That's roughly 291.5 times the speed of sound.

Avatar image for rpottage
rpottage

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rpottage: What are you even talking about? Thats a massive Strawman. I'm not saying that Wanda lost in a fair fight in IW. I am saying she is Bloodlusted because she had to watch Vision die Twice.In "Age of Ultron", it is revealed that Scarlet Witch's powers are intertwined with her Emotions. In Endgame, characters who are Un-Snapped come back with no sense of time between the events. So since she is Bloodlusted, it makes sense she is able to break his sword. This catches Thanos off guard, Thanos is simultaneously fighting other Avengers, and he was immediately cut off from using the Gauntlet by Wanda after this event.

Thanos vs Wanda in a random encounter would end with Wanda dead within seconds. She struggled against Corvus Graive and Proxima Midnight ffs.

Bloodlusted Wanda >> Thanos >>>>> Wanda

The Endgame feat is an outlier, Wanda couldn't even defeat Ultron on her own in AoU.

So then you're admitting she didn't lose a fair fight.

You mean the fight where she was ambushed and injured early on, then spent the entire "fight" trying to protect the gravely injured vision instead of taking out the other two?


In which case we have exactly 1 fight between her and Thanos; the fight in which she demolishes him. And no, he wasn't fighting other Avengers. He was fighting her, just her, and she destroyed him. She didn't cut him off from his gauntlet, he didn't have it. It was just him versus her, both of them out for blood; and she won.

Avatar image for rpottage
rpottage

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@chicago_bastard: Bloodlusted Wanda who just lost to him Twice in IW (Characters are brought back as if no time lapsed) It took Wanda literally minutes to destroy the Soul Stone and she has never displayed DC on the level of Endgame before that event. She won that fight because she was Bloodlusted.

OT: If Immortal characters are allowed, I think that Dormammu is above everybody else.

Wanda didn't simply "lose twice" in Infinity War. She destroyed the mind stone while holding off Thanos; and you can clearly see the space stone glowing when she's holding him off. She only "loses" when he surprises her by bringing back Vision then sucker punching her while she's shocked.

She then demolished Thanos in Endgame because he didn't have the stones anymore.

Avatar image for rpottage
rpottage

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rpottage: Now you're just lowballing aint even gonna bother. Hulk evidently wins...

No, lowballing would be pointing out the Tank was attacked twice before Hulk caught it; and that the second attack seemed to blow the turret completely off. Which is why there was no turret while Hulk was holding the tank. Making it likely less than 50k pounds; and assuming it's the older model of tank that weighs about 10k less to begin with making it less than 40k pounds.

That would be lowballing. Instead I gave it the benefit of the doubt that it was the heavier version of tank, and that the two attacks did 0 damage to the tank.

What I didn't do was highball it. I used some basic calculations to figure out what a fair weight of both vehicles would be. Which has nothing to do with durability anyways.

And since my first post I pointed out that Shazam might not have the strength but he has the speed, electricity generation, and flight. none of which you ever addressed.

Avatar image for rpottage
rpottage

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@thanos_thebadas: The assault takes place in what would be a former Soviet Bloc country; meaning the tank would most likely be a modified T-55, or possibly a T-72. Both are lightweight tanks, and while the T-55 is more common it's also lighter, but also older.

A T-72 weighs about 90k pounds; but about 40k of that is the turret which would've been completely removed and redesigned for the Tesseract Weaponry. It also doesn't hold the heavy ammunition that a T-55 would have. So with the modifications you're looking at closer to 50k pounds.

A typical bus with passengers weights about 38k pounds. Which means it's only 12k pounds difference; not nearly enough to say Hulk outclasses Shazam.


Running through metal is far less impressive than going through the ground. The sheer density of the ground is much more impressive. So since we already have that feat; everything below that isn't impressive.

Except they don't showcase his durability because he keeps getting beaten. It's not like he takes the attacks from Ironman then wins; that would be more impressive. But he loses, which means those attacks are the limit of what he can take. He can't take anything more than that.

Except that since Hulk never gets to shine, showing how powerful Thor/Hulkbuster/Thanos are simply have the effect of showing how weak the Hulk is. That's the Worf effect. You introduce a character as being really powerful, so that later on you can show how powerful other people are by having them beat that character. But since you never re-establish their power and just have them keep getting beaten, it actually just makes them weak. Thanos beating Hulk is meaningless because Hulk never beats anyone. The fact that he does it so easily, then appears to have more trouble with the Ironman team or with Captain America just highlight that problem.

No, I didn't fail to mention the Abomination feats; you're just not listening. The abomination feats all take place in the first movie. But the MCU has basically abandoned that movie. They used it to set Hulk up as powerful, but only in that one movie. He never displays anything close to the feats he did in that movie elsewhere. That's how they set him up as the embodiment of the Worf Effect. But it also makes the feats from that movie useless as they are barely canon and would be outliers.

I didn't ignore the shockwave in the Ironman fight either; I combined the Ironman fight into one point; which was that it's a suit of armor to which Hulk lost. He was matched in strength, and subsequently beaten, by armor. That's not impressive.

Avatar image for rpottage
rpottage

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@thanos_thebadas:
Running through metal: Okay. That's not a super impressive feat. Shazam was tackled through the street and shrugged it off.

Catching a tank: He does catch a tank. It's damaged however, and it uses tesseract weapons instead of heavier ammunition. Ultimately this would be about on par with Shazam catching a bus. Maybe slightly stronger, but not much; and Hulk doesn't keep it very long while Shazam holds it in the air for much longer.

Bunker: Same thing as the metal.

Leviathan: Yes, the Leviathan was one of the two scenes I said he had in Avengers that was impressive.

The Hulkbuster is simply a suit of armor; and it matched Hulk's strength and defeated him.

Car kick: That's less impressive than his other feats, so meaningless.

Going through the ground: That's probably his best feat in that movie. It also puts him on par with Shazam going through the street.

You then have clips of a fight he lost to Ironman. A fight where he failed to defeat a weakened Thor and a re-powered Thor knocked him on his ass so the Grandmaster freaked out and stopped the battle. And the one movie I said had his feats, that Marvel basically ignores; and that was used to set him up as a threat so he could then be the embodiment of the Worf Effect.

The Leviathan feat was the only one that could've arguably put him as stronger than Shazam; but it's not quantifiable, so it's no more useful than Shazam fighting Sivana. Durability wise he should be extremely durable based on the first movie; but the Avengers, Age of Ultron, and Infinity War all diminish his durability feats

Avatar image for rpottage
rpottage

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rpottage said:
@thanos_thebadas said:
@rpottage said:
@thanos_thebadas said:

@rpottage: No he isn't. Lok at this thread https://comicvine.gamespot.com/marvel-cinematic-universe/4015-56089/forums/mcu-hulk-respect-thread-2012952/

he is still powerful

Agree to disagree then. You're not going to address my points, and the respect thread doesn't change my view.

what points?

The points I made.

e.g. Worf Effect, anger before Hulkbuster, limited foes and important scenes, etc.

I made a pose about all that stuff, and your response was: No, respect thread. Still powerful.

Not a compelling argument/counter-argument.

I posted a set of feat on the previous page, view those and try to counter them

You replied to my original post and started this chain; but you're unwilling to admit when you're wrong or to really debate. You just drop things, and say look at the respect thread.

So why would I go out of my way to search for points you made elsewhere and then debunk or debate them; when I know you're not going to listen?

Avatar image for rpottage
rpottage

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rpottage said:
@thanos_thebadas said:

@rpottage: No he isn't. Lok at this thread https://comicvine.gamespot.com/marvel-cinematic-universe/4015-56089/forums/mcu-hulk-respect-thread-2012952/

he is still powerful

Agree to disagree then. You're not going to address my points, and the respect thread doesn't change my view.

what points?

The points I made.

e.g. Worf Effect, anger before Hulkbuster, limited foes and important scenes, etc.

I made a pose about all that stuff, and your response was: No, respect thread. Still powerful.

Not a compelling argument/counter-argument.

Avatar image for rpottage
rpottage

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rpottage: No he isn't. Lok at this thread https://comicvine.gamespot.com/marvel-cinematic-universe/4015-56089/forums/mcu-hulk-respect-thread-2012952/

he is still powerful

Agree to disagree then. You're not going to address my points, and the respect thread doesn't change my view.

Avatar image for rpottage
rpottage

969

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

12

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@rpottage said:
@thanos_thebadas said:

@rpottage: No he doesn't win . Hulk stomps. Thor never took him out in Ragnarok, and he tanked a lighting amped punch, Hulkbuster only koed him because he was about to turn back into Banner, before that he tankes getting rammed through a big ass building.

Thor took him out. The Grandmaster had to use his disk to knock Thor out because he was defeating Hulk, and Grandmaster didn't want that.

You're making the Banner thing up. There was no evidence he was about to turn back; and there's no evidence that if he were that would matter. Hulk was still in Hulk mode, and got knocked out. Just like he did when he fell from the Helicarrier.

Thor didn't take him out, he was still conscious throughout the entire fight, and wasn't injured at all.

Yes there is, watch the clip again, you can see that Hulk has calmed down and shivers a bit as if he was about to transform.

He was conscious, but the fight was over. Hulk pummelled Thor with all his might, only for Thor to shrug it off and send him flying when he unlocked more of his power. Which absolutely stunned Hulk, and freaked the Grandmaster out.

You should watch the clip again, he doesn't shiver. He stops and looks at all the destruction he caused. Then he gets angry again, starts to growl, gets into his charging position, clenches his fist; and his knocked out by Ironman.

The MCU Hulk is essentially the embodiment of the Worf Effect. They gave him one movie where they let him show off his strength (and then subsequently ignored that movie), then gave him two scenes in Avengers (Thor vs Hulk, and punching the Chitari Whale); and have since then continually used him to show how other people are badass.

Oh look, Hulk got beat by the Hulkbuster; that's how powerful it is.
Oh look, a weakened Thor can go toe to toe with the Hulk; and can beat him by unlocking his power.
Oh look; Surtur is so powerful he can just shrug Hulk off.
Oh look, Thanos is so strong he can decimate Hulk.

And that's basically it. He doesn't fight anyone else really. The Hulk is a seriously mismanaged character in the MCU.