RightScar

This user has not updated recently.

312 0 24 19
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

RightScar's forum posts

Avatar image for rightscar
RightScar

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By RightScar
@PowerHerc said:

Yes, how long someone can perform at his peak without tiring.  After potentially fighting at peak levels for several thousand years; that's where age becomes the deciding factor.

 

Who's ridiculous?  You said this was making you sad.  Touchy much?

"
 You know what stamina means and you know what longevity means.You are only mixing the two for to try and pretend Hercules is better than Thor in a way he actually isn't.I didn't say that you were making me sad I said your responses were getting sad at this point.It's a clear sign of desperation.
Avatar image for rightscar
RightScar

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By RightScar
@PowerHerc said:
" @RightScar said:
"

                    @PowerHerc said:
Okay.  The one I have is the OHOTMU: A-Z, HC vol.12 (2009).  Either way, mine or yours, Thor is still subject to aging.

                   

                "
And the fact remains Hercules only has better longevity than Thor..not better stamina.

                   

                "
The fact is:  You're statement is half right (Longgevity) and half (at this point) hopelessly inaccurate (stamina). "
No my statement is right period.


@PowerHerc said:

And when the millenia go by and the effects of the apples wear off, then, technically, Thor will begin to age and weaken.  Thus I'm still right and you're still wrong.

It's not that I can't detach longevity and stamina.  It's that, in this case, they shouldn't be because they're relationship is a factor when two characters can fight as long as these two can.

It's too bad you're getting sad, though.  I hope you cheer up soon.

"
It is that you can't detach longevity and stamina because if someone asked you what Thor's stamina was they are asking how long he can perform at his peak without tiring...not how long he can go without tiring thousands of years from now.
Getting sad? Don't be ridiculous.
Avatar image for rightscar
RightScar

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By RightScar
@Vance Astro said:
" @Joe Venom said:
" Taskmaster not only does he make better use of his ability, but he also has an eye for potential and is a great teacher.  "
Taskmaster doesn't make better use of his ability.He's been around alot longer than Echo.Echo hasn't had time to do any of those things.Neither is better.Photographic reflexes is photographic reflexes.There is no levels.It's not like healing factor,energy manipulation,speed,or strength. "
Avatar image for rightscar
RightScar

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By RightScar
@PowerHerc said:
Okay.  The one I have is the OHOTMU: A-Z, HC vol.12 (2009).  Either way, mine or yours, Thor is still subject to aging. "
And the fact remains Hercules only has better longevity than Thor..not better stamina.
Avatar image for rightscar
RightScar

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By RightScar
@PowerHerc said:

You can't get anything right, can you?  The latest Handbook states Thor has an "extended lifespan" not your term 'enhanced longevity.'  Either way, it still makes it clear that Thor is not immortal. 

It's you who can't cope with that fact and the fact that this is one of several ways, physical and otherwise,  in which Hercules is superior to Thor.  What you fail to see is one (stamina) is contingent upon the other (aging) at some point.

"
Thor not being immortal has nothing to do with stamina.Based on what is stated Thor's longevity is now connected to his periodic intake of Iddun's apples.His last intake has lasted millenia.So technically there will never be a period in which Thor will have aged to the point he has less stamina than Hercules..thus again you're still wrong.I have nothing to cope with you simply can't detach longevity and stamina.They are two separate things.It's just getting sad at this point.
Avatar image for rightscar
RightScar

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By RightScar
@PowerHerc said:

You can't get anything right, can you?  The latest Handbook states Thor has an "extended lifespan" 

"
This isn't true at all...It's says enhanced longevity like I said.

No Caption Provided

Avatar image for rightscar
RightScar

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By RightScar
@RiseofApocalypse said:
" The Crips and Bloods each have at least 30,000 members. How many do the Saints have? "
It doesn't matter how many members you have when you bring rocket launchers to gun fights.That's just more dead bodies.
Avatar image for rightscar
RightScar

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By RightScar
@daak1212 said:
" I think this was made before "
It was.
Avatar image for rightscar
RightScar

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By RightScar
@PowerHerc said:
Marvel has stated in several of their Handbooks that Thor is not immortal, he is extremely long-lived.  The Handbooks are Marvel's official definition of their characters, so that's proof enough.  No twisting by me here.  You're just a bit too narrow minded in seeing the relationship between stamina and aging.  Aging does matter. "
I have Thor's latest handbook entry.It says nothing about his stamina or immortality only that he has enhanced longevity due to eating Iddun's apples.
I'm not denying any relationship between aging and stamina i'm denying it matters here.You're only saying this because you can't cop[e with the fact that Hercules really isn't superior to Thor any any physical way.He doesn't have better stamina.What you are talking about is longevity not stamina.
Avatar image for rightscar
RightScar

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

19

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By RightScar
@Osiris1428 said:

" Steve Rogers became so conflicted with the role and how he felt about the direction America was taking he abandoned the title and took on a new one-NOMAD: A man without country. "His values have nothing to do with our way as a capitalist country." Why should have to represent himself in a way he does not want to? "

I don't think you understood what I meant.Steve Rogers stands for Freedom,Liberty,The Pursuit of Happiness, the core values of the United States of America.Something like Capitalism has nothing to do with Steve Rogers beliefs and values what so ever.Just because he represents the United States as Captain America doesn't mean that he shares all of the same views as our government.Steve Rogers became Nomad when he found out a US government official (possibly the current President at the time) was running a terrorist organization.It had nothing to do with America as a country.