@Queen's Halo: Well if you put it as "Since when are Superhero's in support of child endangerment" ti would be since uhhh the 1940s.
Seriously get over yourself "the majority opinion is not the right opinion" THERE IS NO RIGHT OPINION, certainly not yours.
Nope, that is when the writers decided they needed younger characters for readers to related.
... And I don't think I will. And if it's not mine, then it's I highly doubt it's yours or any other fan boys' who can only understand something when it comes from a flashy hole-filed plots.
Hopefully everyone dies and from everyone's minds the memories of this series are erased so people would stop talking about it like it was actually good.
lol are you high?
No. Just saying the truth. There are so many things wrong with this show - it was a mistake it was even made.
The vox populi would disagree.
The majority opinion is not the right opinion in this case. This series fails when at it's core the premise makes little to no sense - what you have is a group of seasoned protectors letting their sidekicks who have barely passed the superhero equivalent of potty training deal with dangerous villains. Since when are superheroes in support of child endangerment? Never, that's when aka this series makes no sense. Yeah, the character designs and development are above average, it's still saying that moldy bread is OK to eat if the cheese is good.
Hopefully everyone dies and from everyone's minds the memories of this series are erased so people would stop talking about it like it was actually good.
lol are you high?
No. Just saying the truth. There are so many things wrong with this show - it was a mistake it was even made.
Hopefully everyone dies and from everyone's minds the memories of this series are erased so people would stop talking about it like it was actually good.
That would totally make sense for a man who regularly puts his son in the line of danger to try to bring him back through some stupid ass method that never works out properly.
Log in to comment