@dagda: That's one essential problem. Murdering plot holes! Peter could have done a great deal of actions in order to defeat Doc (Avengers, MJ, Dr. Strange, FF - Dr. Reed and the list goes on and on). But, nooooo. He thinks that he should call a bunch of villains to help him to escape. That was fun, right? Wrong. That was shitty writing, Slot s!*#@!*%) all over our face. I read SSM#1, despite the fact I said to myself, I shouldn't. I dislike the whole thing, feeling that there's no sense in all this. I dropped it officialy waiting for someone else to take over. And to be honest, I used to like Slott...
It sounds very interesting and I guess we'll see Storm as a leader again (Why when Ororo leads, has her hair cut? I never liked the look, but I adore Ororo).
The film was terrible in general, while it could be decent enough or even better, it could be great. The main problem in my point of view? It wasn't interesting. I thought I was watching Superman 1 all over again with some additions that were making it even more dull and quite frankly more pointless and stupid. I liked Routh as Supes/Clark. I wanted to watch a second Superman effort with him. Never happened. C'est la vie. Let's see what happens with Man of Steel (crossing fingers).
I prefer Garfield, since he's a better actor and resembles more to what I have in my mind as Peter Parker. I really liked Maguire in Spiderman 1, but then this happened:
Clint Eastwood would rock as Peter! I'm teasing you (obviously). Bartha seems nice, but I don't know if he's an ok actor. Haven't seen much with him. To be honest, I really liked Garfield as Pete.
Log in to comment