Petey_is_Spidey

Whether or not a character is Iconic cannot be determined at a particular point in time. An iconic status is created over time, as a character/person cements himself within a culture and pervades the cultural ethos. Whether or not Thanos is iconic can only be determined in the future. Popularity fades; being an icon is more long-lasting (see Superman)

Now as you may know, the Snyder cut is getting a official release next year. Obviously he's going to edit the film, and even add additional scenes. But I was wondering, do you think he will take out some scenes that even his fans didn't like. I say this because much of the humor that many Snyder fans bashed the theatrical cut for having actually came from Snyder; most notably, Barry's quirkiness. With the exception of a few scenes - him falling on WW's chest, the brunch stuff - pretty much everything we saw from Barry in the TC is from Snyder.

It'll be interesting to see if he removes/edits out some of that stuff.

How does what I say in the OP at all contradict the title.

I say "DCEU Doomsdays", as in, evolved Doomsdays of unknown level can destroy moons, just not the one we see in the movie; that doesn't contradict the title at all.

Plus, what Thanos did in IW isn't even remotely similar to what we see in MoS. Thanos took of tiny chunks (compared to the size of the moon, those fragments were minuscule) off the moon and threw them at Stark; Krypton's Doomsday separated Krypton's moon into entire fragments the size of continents (assuming their moon is comparable in size to our own).

Lol, you don't care so much about this movie that you've posted in nearly every Snyder Cut related thread in the past 3 days.

How does it feel to have Zack Snyder living in your head rent free? People like you are sad.

I've never understood the whole "only the theatrical versions of movies can be considered canon" argument. So if something happens off screen, it's not cannon? What if something is hinted at, but not explicitly stated, but is nonetheless later confirmed by the director to have happened; that's not considered canon?

It's really bizarre.

Are there people who thought that Snyder had a fully finished cut of the film? Yes. Those people are by far the minority. The vast majority of us knew that though principle photography was done, and the scenes were cut together, that the CGI was not entirely finished. This isn't news. We always knew that he had a cut together 214 minute long film with undone CGI and post-production. Unfortunately, we have people trying to spin this as "hur dur da sNyDeR cUt DiDn'T eXiSt" to save face. It's disingenuous as hell.

You said "it literally didn't exist" not "it is unfinished". The latter is true, the former is just bs.

If it "didn't exist", it would cost a whole lot more than $20 million bucks to "make it exist".

Take your L and move on.

Also you can't call me that on CV, definitely past the insult rules.

Aw, gonna cry?

Really? Maybe, who knows. I've always thought they were just narcissistic, bitter people who wants everyone else to know how much they dislike something.

Lol you people are f*cking clowns. Actors have said they've seen it; people in the comicbook media business (like Kevin Smith) have said they've seen it; he's literally showed the 3h34m film on his Vero account. Yet we still have clowns like yourself denying its existence despite the fact that it is literally starring you in the face.

The principle photography is completely done, and has always been done. The $20 million is going towards finishing the CGI and some potential reshoots that he may want to do. However, the initial principle photography - the 3 hour 34 minute cut that he has in his home - is real.

You were wrong; get over it.

Honestly it feels like 2015/2016 all over again. I can't recall being this hyped for a movie since BvS (I would say JL, but it was pretty apparent since June that they were going to butcher that film)