@turoksonofstone: Whatever you think of Kirby or his family (lets face it everyone knows that characters belong to the company that publishes them and not the writers hired there) don't bring Stan Lee into the arguement, he is personally reponsible for the creation of the majority of best selling and fan favourite characters in the industry (Spider-Man, X-men, Avengers, Daredevil, Hulk, Fantastic Four etc) He is in no way a 'credit absobing hack', his creations have been the best selling comics from the early sixties to the current day. He deserves any recognition he gets.
I always thought that Danny could beat Luke, he could easily evade Luke's attacks and then drop him with a powerful 'IF' strike to the throat or nerve cluster or something. Since Danny's recent power level 'upgrade' he's definately the winner in any future fight.
@RightScar: Actually he is, Herc is physically stronger (Pure lifting strength) and has more stamina than Thor and he is a better fighter. (pure H2H) Think about it, Thor has the memories and experience of about a thousand years whereas not only does Herc have over three thousand years of experience he was already once of Earth's greatest combatants back then, he is even credited with the creation of pankration from which all modern wrestling and mixed combat styles trace their origin. Hercules should be one of the greats of the MU but Marvel rarely uses him at his full potential.
I always liked Random as a hero. I am an avid Marvel fan but it annoys me when they kill off or depower cool characters like Nightcrawler, Brass, Maverick etc. and keep absolute crap characters like Bliss around.
I can understand the fear and prejudice but to act on it has always seemed dumb to me, who in their right mind would attack known superhuman beings with baseball bats etc.
Log in to comment