NyxEquitis

@badaboop said:

@NyxEquitis: Beautiful, man. That was just too beautiful. Brought a tear to my eye.

Ha, glad it had the desired effect.

@Twentyfive said:

@NyxEquitis said:

@Twentyfive said:

@War Killer: So do I. But we are the only two...

I don't dislike the character; only the timing and the fact that him and Coulson were brought into 616 around the time of The Avengers so people wouldn't be confused by Nick Fury being white. I really don't care for that strategy, be it Marvel or DC...I do like the concept of Nick Fury's son, however. Just not the way his introduction came about.

I can understand that. But with a lot of the people here that do dislike him, I do not see the reason why. When was the last time Fury was an instrumental force in the Marvel U? Now all of a sudden we get this, and people go crazy.

And no, this is not a race thing. The same thing was happening with Alan Scott. People came out of nowhere whining and moaning about his update. When was the last time Scott was really relevant. When people say GL, the main two they mean is Hal and Kyle (sometimes John, but no...). Those people cannot say they were lifelong fans of Alan Scott, or that he was anywhere near in their top 25 list of Superheroes.

These things are part of my frustration with comics, and why I may eventually move on to solely buying indie comics.

Well glad you could understand that; I think that people hating a concept because of it being different can be bad, it just depends on the severity of the change and circumstances around it.

@Twentyfive said:

@War Killer: So do I. But we are the only two...

I don't dislike the character; only the timing and the fact that him and Coulson were brought into 616 around the time of The Avengers so people wouldn't be confused by Nick Fury being white. I really don't care for that strategy, be it Marvel or DC...I do like the concept of Nick Fury's son, however. Just not the way his introduction came about.

@Cap10nate: Very true; however I hope that that wasn't the purpose of that scene...It's definitely plausible, I just hope it doesn't come to that and they use him in Avengers 2.

@Cap10nate: Well, supposedly there was something in the Avengers about Cap reminiscing over him but it was cut...we'll have to wait for the Blu-Ray to come out to see what thats about...

As for Civil War...I think that would be a very bad idea, theres no way they could try to pull off that in a movie universe with so few heroes actually in it.(Now maybe they could take some concepts from it, but a full-blown Civil War? I doubt it) And obviously the next villain has already been teased; Thanos.

Too many figures, too little cash....

One thing ive noticed is that the two probably biggest, well-known heroes(period, as far as non-comic fans) are DC; Superman and Batman. Sure, Spiderman, Captain America, et al are well known, but the two most well known characters are Superman and Batman. Most well-known female character? Wonder Woman, I dont think that most people(meaning non-comic fans) know many, if any, female Marvel heroes.

Just an observation, not really a difference between the two companies.

You know, this should not come as surprise to those who have kept up on Marvel movies...Sebastian Stan signed a deal for 6 movies, thats been (un)common knowledge for a while now. With that many movies planned, dont be surprised to see him in an Avengers sequel.

http://m.ign.com/articles/2011/04/26/everything-we-know-about-captain-america

(Third paragraph under "The Story")

Deadpool Video Game!? What!? Awesome!!

@War Killer said:

No.