@never_give_up: anytime man, but hey when you get a chance, look up what bias means. i see you using it a lot, but i don't think you really understand the meaning.
Sure thing.
While you can actually read a Superman comic so you can get a better understanding of him. It may take some time since most DBZ mangas don't involve you using your brain cells. Which is why it's hard for you to understand more complicated topics and conflicts involving Superman. Additionally, you may want to learn things in Marvel or DC are not solved how they are in DBZ. By understanding this, you may get a better grasp on certain characters.
@never_give_up: you lack any sort of argument. you call me bias, but you can't explain why.... which is essentially what you do every thread. you make a claim, then you fail to defend that claim. explain why the superman games don't suck, or don't tag me.
Tagged.
You are unaware of your own bias it's fine. Most of the debates we have you usually have an outlandish claim. Such as Broly being a galaxy buster. When it's obviously wrong then I'll go through the motions and you won't change your mind. I never said they were any good Superman games. You misunderstand me but that's okay. Below is part of what you said. If the people who worked on Arkham or people of merit worked on a Superman game we could probably get a good game. Smart game developers would be able to make a better game than Superman 64. A good Superman game can be made. There's no reason to move on. Unless we want ANOTHER Batman related game and so on.
Pretty sure i'm missing a few, but point is every superman game has been terrible. Smart games developers would move on to other heroes.
Broly ? okay ? not relate to this...
Smart game developers would make other super hero games. their main objective is to make money. superman games are terrible and don't sell..no bias there.
@never_give_up: you lack any sort of argument. you call me bias, but you can't explain why.... which is essentially what you do every thread. you make a claim, then you fail to defend that claim. explain why the superman games don't suck, or don't tag me.
Tagged.
You are unaware of your own bias it's fine. Most of the debates we have you usually have an outlandish claim. Such as Broly being a galaxy buster. When it's obviously wrong then I'll go through the motions and you won't change your mind. I never said they were any good Superman games. You misunderstand me but that's okay. Below is part of what you said. If the people who worked on Arkham or people of merit worked on a Superman game we could probably get a good game. Smart game developers would be able to make a better game than Superman 64. A good Superman game can be made. There's no reason to move on. Unless we want ANOTHER Batman related game and so on.
Log in to comment