Netshyster

"He said he is not religious. That is not the same thing as saying he isn't Christian and he's likely lying to try and add credibility to his logic anyway."

If I'm NON RELIGIOUS how can I be a Christian when being NON RELIGIOUS means HAVING NO RELIGION. Like so many brainwashed unfortunates your mind can only comprehend this debate in a predetermined schism between RELIGIOUS thought and ATHEIST thought with your good and bad guys already decided; you're a programmed machine with input output responses and who is incapable of rational or critical thought.

"The basis for his argument is that the "you can't reproduce with that kind of sex"

And if you were even a REMOTELY rational person you would see the validity of the argument, but you've already been thoroughly indoctrinated into the western worlds new ideology of moral relativism and the uncertain nature of everything. I do not subscribe to such viewpoints on reality or life.

Look at the REALITY of NATURAL LIFE around you, and observe sexual intercourse logically and scientifically, actually engage your rational mind for a bit. Clearly we can see that Nature, having designed all bodies and substances in our world, had a plan and a purpose in her creations as she did with SEX. Is it somehow a freak accident that MALES AND FEMALES ARE DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY, in a physical manner to engage in sexual intercourse, and are programmed to find each other sexually attractive, with resultant sex between the two resulting in REPRODUCTION? Something tells me this is no accident and is the NATURAL ORDER of sexual behaviour for humans. How could it not be?

Where is the validity for homosexual sex? Where has nature designed and accommodated for her units to engage in such activity? Please tell me?

Normal, natural sexual orientation IS HETEROSEXUALITY. Normal, natural sexual behaviour is HETEROSEXUAL SEX. These realities cannot be argued.

Natural things are natural because they CONFORM TO NATURE'S PURPOSES, not because they simply exist in nature, which is the ridiculous and faulty logic used to give credibility to homosexuality. It has no credibility.

HOMOSEXUALITY IS NOT NATURAL OR NORMAL BECAUSE IT DOES NOT CONFORM IN ANY WAY, TO NATURE'S INTENDED AND VERY CLEAR PARAMETERS OF SEXUALITY AND SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR. IT IS THEREFORE UNNATURAL. HAVING NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT NATURE INTENDED OR CREATED.

No, I'm not religious.

Lol, I didn't make the activism a big thing at all, other people did. I only pointed out that these movements are usually if not entirely generated by are funded, supported and backed by elitist groups for private reasons.

What do you mean I don't have any proof being gay is wrong? Does the fact that sexual intercourse and reproduction is divided between two opposing pairs being MALE and FEMALE mean nothing to you? You're free to ignore reality all you want, I won't.

They're different in levels of severity but not in their wrongness. It's as wrong to murder as it is to be a homosexual.

I'm not so much comparing them as I'm stating that WRONG is WRONG, regardless of which you perceive is more wrong than the other. If murder is the only stage in which you feel it necessary to draw a line and say "this behaviour is unacceptable" then how many things will it be possible for you to tolerate even if by conventional standards they are considered wrong? Just not so wrong that you're willing to do anything about it.

Why not lend the same support to the felons in prison then? If murder makes you happy then go right ahead sir, who am I to judge you?

This isn't difficult.

Simply being a Homosexual is not social activism, who was arguing that in the first place? But an organized grouping of homosexuals formed for and actively engaged in activities, protest and gatherings that were designed and created to CHANGE social paradigms concerning said community IS social activism and makes a social movement.

"Social movements are large informal groupings of individuals and/or organizations focused on specific political or social issues. They are a type of group action."

How do the LGBT community and Atheist activist community not fall into this category? Keep trolling my friend, keep trolling.

Did you really think that through? Everything on Earth biologically is conceived by Nature, so explain to me how nature is terrible? YOU yourself are a product of Nature. You're forming insane opinions about reality.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_social_movements

Wikipedia page on homosexual social movements.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Atheism

Wikipedia page on Atheism as a social and political movement.

For an idea or belief to be classified as a "movement" it must be actively promulgated onto society as an attempt to change that societies ideas and views on the particular idea behind the movement. Atheism and Homosexuality are social movements with the intent to reshape societies thinking in line to its own.