Ms. Invisible

This user has not updated recently.

3331 49369 28 270
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Ms. Invisible's forum posts

Avatar image for ms__invisible
Ms. Invisible

3331

Forum Posts

49369

Wiki Points

270

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 3

#1  Edited By Ms. Invisible
   @Lady Redhead. said: 
" god i miss the heat while im in the UK its so freaking cold! "
I prefer the cold over heat. I like being all snugly and wearing layers of clothing.
 
@.Mistress Redhead. said:
" @Acer said:
" @Lady Redhead. said:
" god i miss the heat while im in the UK its so freaking cold! "
Thats why I never go outside :p "
lol we can be humongous fat people on our computers then lol "  
But who will bring us our comic books to read?!
Avatar image for ms__invisible
Ms. Invisible

3331

Forum Posts

49369

Wiki Points

270

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 3

#2  Edited By Ms. Invisible
@Urban_Spaceman said:
" it's been raining nonstop for 4 days here on the central coast, and it was 30 something degrees the day before all that, it's weird... "
Rain like that would be so awesome because of the drought in Australia.
Avatar image for ms__invisible
Ms. Invisible

3331

Forum Posts

49369

Wiki Points

270

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 3

#3  Edited By Ms. Invisible
@Zenma said: 


Ahh, but you can't prove it, we can only believe that evolution occurred which is the same as how people believed God. Just because there isn't scientific proof of God's existence doesn't mean he does not exist yet no one could prove it scientifically nor can they disprove it, that is why people have faith. "  

Man, you live on the Internet and you're asking me for proof of evolution. Have you actually gone and studied it? Even just a little? I'm not asking you to become a scientist, but knowing the "basic plot" in these things helps a lot.  
 
Just want to put this out there: many scientists have gone through experiments regarding the Theory of Evolution. There are many papers out there where scientists talk about their experiments regarding evolution. In these experiments, they find evidence that validates or invalidates it. If you haven't read a single paper about these experiments, then you're not in a position to critique a theory that has been through so much scrutiny than you could possibly imagine for the past 150 years.   
 
We know ancient Egyptians existed because of pyramids. We know the Romans existed because of colosseums. That is the kind of evidence I am asking for when I want God to proven. Nothing has been left which could even get me to start thinking that God even existed (and no, the Bible is not a reliable source). Having said that, I am open to the idea of a god existing, but that's the problem is, no evidence! So my position is "there is no God" so far.
 
Also, it's impossible to disprove something which has never been shown to exist. Saying, "okay, disprove God exists" is shifting the burden of proof, because it's the religious folk who are claiming that God (or a god) exists. 

   Evolution can be disproved, just hasn't been challenged yet, but it cannot be proven as fact.


You also show a fundamental misunderstanding of science itself when ask for "proof" of evolution. Theories are actually are never proven true. If you want proof, then go study geometry because geometry has hard and fast rules. The only kind of proof in science is proof that a theory is false.  Instead of proving a hypothesis to be true, the best status it can reach is a theory (and I'm using that in a scientific context). An unclaimed hypothesis reaches that status through many experiments and observations that will find evidence to support it or contradict it. So to the disappointment of Zenma here, I can't exactly offer you a piece of proof that "proves" evolution. Like I mentioned before, evolution can in fact be proven wrong, it's just that scientists haven't done an experiment where their results contradict the Theory of Evolution.
 
The reason why evolution is widely accepted is because the evidence found so far supports it. The changing of genetic material has been known through experiments and observation. Nothing has caused scientists to go, "Wait a minute..." and gotten them to re-evaluate their position on evolution. There is also a bit of "cross-supporting" because it's not just from a biological point of view, but also in other fields of science, like physics, astronomy and geology. 
 
Having said all that, here are a couple links. I have a lot more if needed: 
 
Avatar image for ms__invisible
Ms. Invisible

3331

Forum Posts

49369

Wiki Points

270

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 3

#4  Edited By Ms. Invisible
@CATMANEXE said:
" ah, and yet another civilized discussion about origin and belief in the CV Off-Topic section,,, "
I lol'd at that.
Avatar image for ms__invisible
Ms. Invisible

3331

Forum Posts

49369

Wiki Points

270

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 3

#5  Edited By Ms. Invisible

 I thought I'd make my own little thread about Australian weather.
 
The weather has been so weird during spring and summer time.  
 
What happens is that it starts raining, and the temperature will be pretty cool, around 20C (I think that's about 70F). The periodic rainfall throughout the day will go on for about a few days. What happens after that is that the sky starts clearing, and you've got some really nice spring-ish weather and the temperature gets up to around 25C. A day or two after that, it gets really hot (read: typical Australian summer time weather), at about 29C (85F). A day after that, it'll be the same throughout the day, though in the afternoon, it'll be very humid which is a sign that there's going to be a thunderstorm and rain after that. The cycle then starts all over again, and it's been like this for almost four months now. 
 
This is the strangest weather I've seen.

Avatar image for ms__invisible
Ms. Invisible

3331

Forum Posts

49369

Wiki Points

270

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 3

#6  Edited By Ms. Invisible

Errrrrrmmmmmm... ice blocks. Rain sucks!

Avatar image for ms__invisible
Ms. Invisible

3331

Forum Posts

49369

Wiki Points

270

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 3

#7  Edited By Ms. Invisible
@Aronmorales said:


Good catch you're right, my remarks aren't scientific but philosophical...
with that said, it doesn't change any meanings. All of my points were supposed to make people think, break out of their small little worlds and think.; Lets see now, the color argument...okay now, first: I wasn't asking how we saw color, because frankly that has absolutely nothing to do with anything in my argument. Second: The "sense" in the way things are done with color is why things are colored the way they are; "why is the sky blue?" "Why is the grass green?" We as humans can only explain how, but not why. As an artist, I know that certain colors are called for in certain situations, so if there is no God, then why do we have color? it doesn't make sense to me as to why we'd have any color if we just spawned from the atom, given that atoms can't think and that they just form together.
 
how we exist is irrelevant, I really couldn't care if I was made out of clay or an atomic structure.
 
Ma'am, your law argument is very, very full of holes. Yeah, I will tell you right now that humans are sinful creatures, believers and non-believers alike, and yes I did intentionally attack evolutionism, for it is a lie conceived to get people away from God (go ahead, tell me it hasn't worked) and by your logic, God creates evil...ma'am, you couldn't be more wrong. The only thing to come out of God is good, evil comes from the devil (d-evil), and we have been recreating it ever since. God doesn't make suffering, war, or anything else that is evil, but he does allow it to exist. Why? to make us stronger, to bring people together, to bring people to Him, and to show that there is some good out of evil...I'm not expecting anyone to believe me, but then again I can't force anyone to do so.
 
Now to the universe argument: I'm narrow minded for not considering the possibility that someone else created everything? The WORLD is too narrow minded to consider a God; besides, my beliefs have an answer as to how everything was made, but the world doesn't wanna buy it because they don't want God.  "  

I pointed out the flaw in your argument (which I clearly outlined in my previous post). Just cos something is beyond your comprehension, that does not mean that a god MUST exist, which is what you're asserting. Why are you not open to other possibilities? You also missed my question regarding colour and creationism: if God created everyone and everything, then why are some people colourblind and why do some animals see other waves in the spectrum (like owls and night vision)? Things like night/thermal vision are useful for humans, but we lack those abilities as useful as they are. 
 
Once again, there's no such word as "evolutionsim". Stop trying to clump it in the same category as creationism. The fact that you call evolution "evolutionism" clues me in on how much you actually know about evolution... and I'm guessing that's not a lot. 
 
If you claim evolution is a lie and say that it's trying to get people away from religion, then back it up. Otherwise, it's all in your head and another baseless accusation. In no way am I saying "Evolution is true, therefore creationism (or the existence of God) is untrue," nor am and trying to turn people away from religion when I support evolution. Even if I did have such an agenda, that doesn't necessarily mean that everybody else who supports evolution is doing the same thing. So you're also generalising. Well done. The rest is just blah blah and the usual religious preaching.  
 
No, I didn't say you're narrow minded for not considering the possibility that some one else created something, because I never said it in the first place. Sorry if I didn't make myself clear, but what I meant by "another possibility" is the Big Bang Theory. If you aren't open to the possibility of that, then yes that is narrow-minded. Now just to clarify in case you jump to conclusions again - yes, I support evolution, but that doesn't necessarily mean that I'm saying creationism is wrong. For me to say that A is right, and therefore B is wrong, is narrow-minded. And that is what you're exactly doing - you're not opening your mind to another possibility of how the universe started.
 
What I wanted was a calm discussion, but you've gotten all defensive and accused me of things I never even intended to do. Not to mention, you're playing victim. "Ooh, the world is against me because of my beliefs!" Quit it. Appeals to emotion won't work with me.
 
PS. Sparda, I hope you're enjoying this.
Avatar image for ms__invisible
Ms. Invisible

3331

Forum Posts

49369

Wiki Points

270

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 3

#8  Edited By Ms. Invisible

Which character is against institutionalised marriage altogether? I want to marry that person.

Avatar image for ms__invisible
Ms. Invisible

3331

Forum Posts

49369

Wiki Points

270

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 3

#9  Edited By Ms. Invisible
@geraldthesloth said:

" @Ms. Invisible said:

" @COBRAMORPH said:
" How much of a slut is Psylocke? "
So she likes having sex with lots of people. Why call her a slut for it? "
Because it is what it is. "
Well the point I wanted to make is slut is a derogatory term towards women who enjoy sex (basically, they do the sexytime thing a lot). I wonder if Psylocke were a male character, would you still direct a derogatory term towards Psylocke then? 
 
But anyway, thanks for stonewalling answer.
Avatar image for ms__invisible
Ms. Invisible

3331

Forum Posts

49369

Wiki Points

270

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 3

#10  Edited By Ms. Invisible
@COBRAMORPH said:
" How much of a slut is Psylocke? "
So she likes having sex with lots of people. Why call her a slut for it?